The policy also set out a 2 - step process for
addressing allegations of research misconduct: 1) an inquiry is launched to determine if there are «reasonable grounds to proceed to an investigation»; and 2) if there are sufficient grounds to proceed, a formal investigation committee is formed.
Not exact matches
► «The involvement
of [online communities in discussions about suspect publications and possible
research misconduct] has made the standardization
of processes to
address allegations more complex and has led to less patience from the scientific community and the public with what are often long timelines in institutional
misconduct investigations,» Science journals Editor - in - Chief Marcia McNutt wrote in an editorial in this week's issue
of Science.
If a complainant who has reported possible
research misconduct alleges retaliation on the part
of DOT organization management, the report will be
addressed by management officials who will conduct an inquiry into the
allegations followed by an appropriate management action.