[1] This post identifies some systemic features of Canadian legal education that create the risk (and perhaps the reality) that law schools do not
adequately serve the public interest.
This post identifies some systemic features of Canadian legal education that create the risk (and perhaps the reality) that law schools do not
adequately serve the public interest.
Not exact matches
To best
serve the
interest of all of our constituents, there needs to be increased collaboration of
public officials, so that the critical issues are
adequately represented.
We have developed a sophisticated screening process that we use to identify
public companies that we believe (i) are undervalued, (ii) are not
adequately serving the
interests of their stockholders and (iii) require a new board of directors, so that, with the encouragement of stockholders such as you, we can begin implementing reforms ourselves with the goal of increasing stockholder value.
In addition, the results are pragmatically important because they
serve the
public interest: There is ample evidence that the
public is currently not being
adequately informed about the risks from climate change, owing largely to flawed media coverage, to which blogs make a contribution.
1) That since clients can not
adequately evaluate the quality of the service, they must trust those they consult; and 2) That the client's trust presupposes that the practitioner's self -
interest is overbalanced by devotion to
serving both the client's
interest and the
public good.