Sentences with phrase «adjusted mean scores»

Among the 3 infants whose mothers used the drug late in pregnancy but discontinued the medication during breastfeeding, the adjusted mean z scores were still higher by 0.86 units, compared with the adjusted mean scores of infants with postnatal exposure whose mothers also had used the drug late in pregnancy.

At 12 weeks, the intervention group adjusted mean score for depressive symptoms on the BDI - II was significantly lower than the control group by 5.8 points (95 % CI − 11.1 to − 0.5) after adjusting for baseline depression scores, anxiety, sociodemographics, psychotropic medication use and clustering by practice.

After controlling for the child's age and sex and adjusting for baseline severity of child and maternal symptoms, there was a significantly larger decrease in internalizing (adjusted mean score difference, 8.6; P <.001), externalizing (6.6; P =.004), and total (8.7; P <.001) symptoms among children of mothers who had a remission from major depressive disorder over the 3 - month period than among children of mothers whose major depressive disorder did not remit (Table 4).

Adjusted mean score on the WSAS at 12 weeks was lower (better) in the intervention group than the controls by a mean of 3.0 points, which was not statistically significant (95 % CI − 7.3 to 1.3).

Not exact matches

Figure 3 shows the cluster - adjusted mean child verbal IQ scores at age 6.5 years across maternal education in each randomized group.

The difference in mean adjusted z scores by medication group from the repeated measures analysis is shown in Fig 3.

The researchers found that HAP participants maintained the benefits they showed at the end of treatment through the 12 - month period, with significantly lower symptom severity scores (adjusted mean difference in BDI - II:?

«Using student test scores to sanction teachers and schools makes it more likely they will adjust their behaviour to protect themselves, which may mean leaving the weakest learners behind,» explains Manos Antoninis, Director of the GEM Report.

For example, adjusting for English language learner (ELL) status means that each score reflects the performance the state's ELL students relative to ELL students nationwide.

From Wikipedia about de - «personalized education», in the Debate section - «What personalized learning really means is adjusting the difficulty level of prefab skills - based exercises based on student test scores... (and) requires the purchase of software...» From the first Wikipedia paragraph, citing 2017 US NETP,»... (students and teachers) talk about learning progress, process and / or PRODUCTS (my caps)».

Timelines could be adjusted to ensure that when scores are delivered, all components are delivered and no one will have to speculate what they mean.

The minimum FICO ® SBSS ℠ Credit Score threshold used for approvals by the SBA pre-screening is 140 to date, however, most lenders have adjusted their threshold of approvals to be between 160 — 180; This means that if a firm has any derogatory information or has minimal business credit, the principal (s) only chance of gaining a minimum FICO ® SBSS ℠ threshold of 140, would be to have exceptional personal credit.

Your credit score could change because of the new credit, which may mean that your interest rate must be adjusted.

Effect size for the adjusted mean difference between each treatment was calculated by dividing the mean difference in test score by the square root of the within mean square error for the adjusted post-test score.

Effect of intervention on mother — child interaction (CARE Index): mean (SD) scores at 12 months and results of univariate and multivariate analysis of covariance adjusting for total number of risk factors

Effect of intervention on maternal functioning: mean scores at baseline, 6 months and 12 months and results of analysis of covariance adjusting for baseline scores and total number of risk factors

Results Comparing siblings, a one point increase in the mean SCL - 5 score was associated with a 65 % increase in the odds of medical benefit receipt from age 20 — 29 (adjusted OR, 1.65, 95 % CI 1.10 to 2.48).

At 24 months, externalising scores in the intervention and control groups were similar (mean 11.9 (SD 7.2) v 12.9 (7.4)-RRB-; however, on the parent behavior checklist subscale scores, intervention group parents were less likely to report harsh / abusive parenting (mean 38.9 (SD 7.7) v 40.5 (8.8); adjusted mean difference − 1.83, 95 % confidence interval − 3.12 to − 0.55) and unreasonable expectations of child development (40.9 (9.9) v 42.7 (9.6); − 2.18, − 3.74 to − 0.62).

The mean (raw) externalising behaviour scores were similar in the intervention and control groups at 18 months (mean 12.1 (SD 6.9) v 11.9 (6.8); adjusted mean difference 0.16, 95 % confidence interval − 1.01 to 1.33; P = 0.79) and 24 months (mean 11.9 (SD 7.2) v 12.9 (7.4); adjusted mean difference − 0.79, − 2.27 to 0.69; P = 0.30).

The general linear model procedure23 in SAS software was used to conduct the analysis of covariance and obtain the least square means (ie, the means adjusted for baseline score).

At child age 3, the mean (raw) externalising behaviour score was similar between trial arms (mean (SD): 11.4 (7.1) vs 12.4 (7.6); adjusted mean difference − 0.8; 95 % CI − 2.2 to 0.6; p = 0.26).

The study found that «there was no clear evidence that children are better adjusted in either custody type», and that «mean scores for the Child Behavior Checklist lie within the normal range for all custody types.»

At 13 months, early CBT significantly reduced symptoms of PTSD measured by IES, compared with usual care (intention to treat analysis; adjusted mean difference in IES score: CBT v usual care 8.4, 95 % CI 2.4 to 14.4).

On the parenting subscale scores, intervention parents reported fewer unreasonable expectations of child development (37.3 (10.9) vs 39.9 (10.2), adjusted mean difference − 3.1, 95 % CI − 4.9 to − 1.4, p = 0.001).

Then, we conducted sensitivity analysis comparing the mean scale scores across age and gender among the complete cases, all of the available cases, and the imputed cases (coefficients and standard errors from 5 data sets were adjusted for the variability between imputations according to Rubin's rule).