Not exact matches
Brier and the union argue that on a
per -
student, inflation -
adjusted basis, state
spending (through the current year) is down 4 % since Cuomo took office — and 18 % since the 2008 financial crisis.
To illustrate what this analysis might mean nationally, consider Education Week «s calculation of
spending per student,
adjusted (albeit imperfectly) for regional cost differences.
Despite the marked decline in funding
per student, it isn't completely accurate to say that states are
spending less on higher education; in fact, total state and local
spending increased by 13.5 percent (in inflation -
adjusted terms) from 1987 to 2015 nationwide.
Though there has been a decline in state higher - education funding
per student, states are not
spending less on higher education overall; in fact, total state and local
spending increased by 13.5 percent (in inflation -
adjusted terms) from 1987 to 2015 nationwide.
In Missouri,
per -
student spending in inflation -
adjusted dollars increased 33 percent from 1992 to 2014.
From 1996 to 2008,
spending per student, on average, steadily climbed at least 1 percent a year, after
adjusting for inflation, according to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES).
The $ 2,618
spending per pupil, which appears to factor in both WCPSS and charter
students, surpasses a previous inflation -
adjusted high of $ 2,601 in 2004.
While inflation -
adjusted public
spending per student increased 27 percent between 1992 and 2014, an EdChoice study found, teacher wages actually fell an average of 2 percent during that time (in real dollars).
Over the past two plus decades, inflation
adjusted per -
student education
spending in Mississippi has increased by 54 percent while teacher salaries and
student enrollment have decreased by two and three percent, respectively.
In the 2011 - 12 school year, for instance, some 300 school districts
spent less than $ 7,500
per student after
adjusting for cost of living and
student needs.
CAP recommends that the federal government establish a national
per - pupil
spending minimum of $ 7,500
per student after
adjusting for differences in cost of living.
If you point out that
per pupil
spending has more than doubled in the last three decades (
adjusting for inflation) while
student outcomes have remained unchanged, people blame the rising costs of special education.
Over the past two plus decades, inflation
adjusted per -
student education
spending in Mississippi has increased by 54 percent while teacher salaries have increased by just two percent and
student enrollment has decreased by three percent.
Mississippi has increased
per -
student spending,
adjusted for inflation, by 54 percent from FY 1992 through FY 2014.
Public school
students saw a 27 percent increase in real resources
spent on their education, so
adjusted for inflation, public schools were
spending 27 percent more
per student in 2014 relative to 1992.
They pointed out that California ranked 43rd in
adjusted per - pupil expenditures for K - 12 education, according to a survey conducted by Education Week, with
per -
student spending of $ 9,417, which is $ 3,109 below the national average of $ 12,526.
The legislature had been cutting education
spending for years, with the amount of
per -
student funding dropping by nearly 30 percent (when
adjusted for inflation) over the past decade, according to the liberal Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
In raw dollars he proposed
spending up to $ 1,500
per student per year, which,
adjusted for inflation, translates to about $ 10,000 today.
Even after
adjusting for cost of living and
student poverty variables, they found that districts with lower productivity
spent $ 950 more
per student than districts with above average productivity, and the most inefficient districts tended to devote an extra 3 percent of their budgets to administration and other nonteaching expenditures.
«Between fiscal years 1992 and 2014, inflation
adjusted («real»)
per -
student spending increased by 27 percent.
After
adjusting for inflation, 3
spending per student grew 27 percent in the 20 - year period between 1993 — 94 and 2012 — 13 — reflecting average annual growth of 1.3 percent.