Those that
adopt the second view, start with the notion that the
climate varies naturally, and then look for tests to see how much any
particular change in the
climate can be attributed to known perturbations.
In answering this Lewandowsky et al3
adopt a
particular notion, which in the
climate change domain minimizes the scope for any serious questioning of their
particular (calamitous) orthodox view.
The resolution called for one panel discussion on identifying challenges and ways forward towards the realization of all human rights for all, including the right to development, in
particular those in vulnerable situations, as well as the measures and best practices to promote and protect human rights that can be
adopted by States in addressing the adverse effects of
climate change on the full and effective enjoyment of human rights, and another panel discussion on how
climate change has had an adverse impact on States» efforts to progressively realize the right to food, and policies, lessons learned and good practices.