This paper seeks to address this, as well as examining the potentially mediating role of
adult insecure attachment styles in the relationship between childhood adverse experience and adult disorder.
Not exact matches
One of the most widely recognized models of
adult attachment is the Bartholomew and Horowitz (1991) model, laying out at its core, secure and
insecure styles.
The scientific story has developed from
attachment as care - giving and protective (or the opposite: deprivation, inadequacy, or
insecure), to how
attachment may influence an individual's sense of themselves, their part in relationships, and their capacity to problem - solve and look after themselves —
attachment styles, described as «inner working models» in the psychoanalytic literature which may persist into
adult life (as secure, anxious, avoidant, or disorganised).
Research has uncovered two categories of secure
attachment: Continuous - secures and earned - secures.1 My professor at the time was describing continuously secure (and / or
insecure) individuals who develop an
attachment in their childhood and carry that same
attachment style into their
adult romantic relationships.
Hypothesis 4: In terms of current romantic relationships, secure
adult attachment styles will be positively associated with relationship satisfaction, while
insecure adult attachment styles will be negatively associated with relationship satisfaction.