Not exact matches
Although favourable in many parts of North America, electric vehicles in China, where 77 % of the total
electricity production is
coal - derived and many plants do not have
advanced air pollution controls, raise concerns regarding increased air...
Another $ 3.5 - billion plant planned for Sweetwater, Tex., would burn pulverized
coal to generate 600 MW of
electricity while capturing its 5.75 million metric tons of emissions postcombustion with amine or ammonia scrubbers or, possibly, with
advanced membranes that separate CO2 from other flue gases.
Solar panels could produce
electricity at the same price as
coal - and natural gas - burning power plants by the end of this decade if countries direct resources at this rapidly
advancing corner of the energy industry, according to the Paris - based International Energy Agency.
Until
advanced coal - combustion technologies become widely available that allow CO2 to be captured and stored safely underground, the shift to
coal is bad news for climate change because
coal plants usually emit about twice the CO2 per kilowatt - hour of
electricity that gas plants do.
$ 150 billion over ten years, including workforce training, plug - in hybrids, renewable
electricity,
advanced biofuels,
advanced coal technology, nuclear power, and smart grid
In its statement, Peabody reiterated its belief that
advanced clean
coal technology «is the bridge to a low - emissions future for a world experiencing rising
electricity demand to satisfy urbanization and offer a higher quality of life.»
The United States — with its
advanced technology and wealth of wind resources — should be a leader in this field, but unfortunately it continues to rely heavily on
coal, a nineteenth century energy source, for much of its
electricity at a time when European countries are replacing
coal with wind.
The levelized cost of new
coal plants already exceeds that of new NGCC plants, and «today's CCS technologies would add around 80 % to the cost of
electricity for a new pulverized
coal (PC) plant, and around 35 % to the cost of
electricity for a new
advanced gasification - based (IGCC) plant,» according to the EPA (77 FR 22415).
It's one thing to destroy
coal in favor of more expensive energy in an
advanced economy where consumers have more disposable income to absorb the blow of rising energy costs, but to deny developing countries access to
electricity is an absurd form of «liberalism.»
Page 9 «Second, the United States and China should agree to cooperate in rapid deployment to scale in China of
advanced, safe nuclear power for peaceful purposes, specifically to provide clean
electricity replacing aging and planned
coal - fired power plants, as well as averting the need for extensive planned
coal gasification in China, the most carbon - intensive source of
electricity.14»
pg 9 «Second, the United States and China should agree to cooperate in rapid deployment to scale in China of
advanced, safe nuclear power for peaceful purposes, specifically to provide clean
electricity replacing aging and planned
coal - fired power plants,....»
If the method can be used at
coal - fired plants generating
electricity, it would be a major
advance in reducing greenhouse gases, a major cause of global warming.
Invest in a Clean Energy Future Invest $ 150 Billion over 10 Years in Clean Energy: Obama will invest $ 150 billion over 10 years to
advance the next generation of biofuels and fuel infrastructure, accelerate the commercialization of plug - in hybrids, promote development of commercial - scale renewable energy, invest in low - emissions
coal plants, and begin the transition to a new digital
electricity grid.
Indeed,
advanced carbon - capture technology that cleans
coal emissions of carbon dioxide will likely increase from 60 to 70 percent the price of
electricity from
coal.