The basic premise about trying to add emotional capabilities into computers so they can become more
advanced than human life provides some interesting debate regarding the ethical ramifications of trying to play God.
Not exact matches
He is an indefatigable investigator, explicator, and champion of all
living things, from ants to
humans, and he
advances his views in prose more elegant and intricate
than that of many accomplished novelists.
With Neandertals apparently able to formulate hunting and gathering strategies as
advanced as those of the modern
humans who
lived after them at these sites, the secret of H. sapiens success is more mysterious
than ever.
Thanks to
advances in medical science over the past century,
humans have never
lived longer
than we do right now.
Technically and dramatically much weaker
than most slick science - fiction films, Soylent Green is still more realistic on one terrifying point: the ecology will deteriorate, through misuse and overuse of plant and animal
life as well as overpopulation, much sooner
than human technology and architecture will
advance to accommodate it and create the oppressive - but - neat world of domes, interplanetary travel and multi-leveled cities that characterize most movies of the s.f. genre.
Conversely, the person who grows up to engage in the forms of violence that endanger others suffered from the alienation, marginalization and exposure to violence and indoctrination that led them to believe their rights to their beliefs are superior to those of others, to see others as less
than human, and to see the
lives of others as not worthy of value, to not trust others, the rule of law, institutions or governments, which leads to the use of violence as legitimate to
advance their means.