Sentences with phrase «adverse impact on the world»

During the elegant affair, the aquarium hopes to educate guests about how to find seafood that comes from sources with a minimal adverse impact on the world's oceans.

Not exact matches

Henry H. McVey discusses the «New World Order» for asset allocation in the insurance industry, one where creative solutions are necessary to deal with the adverse impact on current income that QE has created in recent years.
«This could have an adverse long - run impact on the ability of the U.S. to maintain its influence and leadership in world economic and political affairs.»
«Our research shows that trade extends the distance between cause and effect by separating consumers in one region and people who suffer adverse health impacts, who are often on the other side of the world
«Maybe we can have the best of both worlds: a price on carbon to create an innovative environment for clean technology in California and keep businesses within state lines and not cause an adverse impact on consumers through radically higher prices for transportation fuels or electricity.»
Financial economists such as World Pensions Council (WPC) researchers have argued that durably low interest rates in most G20 countries will have an adverse impact on the funding positions of pension funds as «without returns that outstrip inflation, pension investors face the real value of their savings declining rather than ratcheting up over the next few years» [19]
On the other hand, those many influences listed can also have an adverse effect on your principal and even the smallest bit of unrest somewhere in the world can have a significant impact on your investmenOn the other hand, those many influences listed can also have an adverse effect on your principal and even the smallest bit of unrest somewhere in the world can have a significant impact on your investmenon your principal and even the smallest bit of unrest somewhere in the world can have a significant impact on your investmenon your investment.
Henry H. McVey discusses the «New World Order» for asset allocation in the insurance industry, one where creative solutions are necessary to deal with the adverse impact on current income that QE has created in recent years.
The goal five years ago was to build momentum to «seal the deal» on a binding climate treaty — a fruitless task given the divisions among the world's nations — while this conclave was centered on a more modest, but more concrete, achievement — «to raise political momentum for a meaningful universal climate agreement [notice there's no mention of the word «binding»] in Paris in 2015 and to galvanize transformative action in all countries to reduce emissions and build resilience to the adverse impacts of climate change.»
Compared to the real world in which unchecked increasing GHG emissions will certainly lead to numerous adverse economic impacts, putting a price on carbon emissions to reduce those impacts will almost certainly prove to be a net economic benefit.
When you argue that a nation emitting high levels of ghgs need not adopt climate change policies because there is scientific uncertainty about adverse climate change impacts, are you arguing that a nation need not take action on climate change until scientific uncertainties are resolved given that waiting to resolve all scientific uncertainties before action is taken may very likely make it too late to prevent catastrophic climate change harms to millions of people around the world?
This speech also acknowledged that it is probably too late to avoid the need of nations to adapt to climate change's adverse impacts.This is so because even if aggressive action it taken on climate change around the world, some adverse climate change impacts are inevitable.
Climate change raises questions of both distributive and retributive justice because: (a) Climate change is a problem caused by some people that inflicts harm on others; (b) Some of the poorest people in the world are extremely vulnerable to its impacts and can do little to protect themselves from those impacts; (c) The adverse impacts to some of the world's poorest people are likely to be catastrophic; and (d) Huge reductions from status quo emissions are necessary to prevent catastrophic warming.
Because a high percentage of the arguments made by most proponents of climate change policy have been focused on adverse climate impacts that citizens will experience where they live, while ignoring the harms to hundreds of millions of vulnerable poor people around the world that are being affected by GHG emissions from all - high emitting nations, along with claims that mainstream climate science is credible and has been undermined by morally reprehensible tactics, there is a need to make more people aware of:
«Lately, along with mitigation of anthropogenic impacts on the climate system by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, the world community places increasing emphasis on the economy and public adaptation to adverse effects of climate change, including analysis and prediction of emerging challenges and threats.»
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z