She also has experience litigating patent infringement, trademark infringement, copyright infringement, unfair competition, and
false advertising cases in federal courts across the country.
Obtained favorable settlement for manufacturer of screens used in the oil and gas industry in a patent and trademark infringement and false
advertising case in the Northern District of Oklahoma.
In a recent Publishers Weekly report, a Twitter
advertising case study showed author Donna Fasanot using Twitter to promote her work: «Following His Heart.»
Rebecca Tushnet has been chronicling astounding accounts of trademark violations and false
advertising cases on this blog since 2003, making her one of the most lasting and prolific bloggers on our list.
Mr. Steinberg's presentation will be entitled, «Proving Falsity in a Lanham Act
False Advertising Case: A Case Study.»
They advertise case studies of individual patients who they say have benefited from the treatments, and some have clinics in major hospital complexes, giving them an air of mainstream acceptance.
If
it advertises case results, the ad must state that results depend upon a variety of unique factors and that past case results do not guarantee similar future case results.
The Tribunal and the courts share jurisdiction over civil misleading
advertising cases.
Most misleading
advertising cases are dealt with under regulatory provisions and attract civil penalties, including a requirement to publish a corrective notice and pay AMPs of up to $ 10 million ($ 15 million for repeat offenders).
Obtained partial summary judgment and entry of permanent injunction in this Lanham Act false
advertising case.
Successful resolution of numerous Competition Bureau bid - rigging, price - fixing and misleading
advertising cases, including responding to a search warrant and defending the Canadian subsidiary of a large U.S. energy trader against a Competition Bureau investigation into allegations of bid - rigging
Among the others docketed were: Argentina v. NML Capital, on discovery of assets of a foreign country; Limelight Networks v. Akamai and Nautilus v. Biosig, both patent cases; Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus on criminalizing false campaign speech; and POM Wonderful v. Coca - Cola Company, a Lanham Act false
advertising case.
The white paper draws from the Bureau's recent abuse of dominance investigations involving big data considerations, and also considers US and European developments in order to identify challenges raised by big data in the context of criminal cartels, mergers, and misleading
advertising cases.