Schneiderman has tussled in court with Trump before, having led a class - cation lawsuit filed over false
advertising claims made against Trump University.
In the summer of 1998, Gillette announced it was suing Optiva for false -
advertising claims made against its Braun unit.
Not exact matches
Baby Milk Action won a case
against Nestle at the
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) in October 2014, after it
made untrue
claims for its SMA toddler milk in an ASDA customer email.
But there is no excuse for violating the marketing requirements — and given the
Advertising Standards Authority has ruled against claims made in the advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of i
Advertising Standards Authority has ruled
against claims made in the
advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of i
advertising for Danone's formula brands, it clearly is not a reliable and objective source of information.
In the UK, Baby Milk Action has won cases
against Nestlé SMA and Danone Nutricia at the
Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) proving they have
made misleading
claims.
Remember, we have won cases at the
Advertising Standards Authority
against misleading
claims made for SMA milks.
Wyeth
advertising to health workers
makes similar
claims to those the ASA has ruled
against today, but the ASA refuses to take action over
advertising directed at health professionals (example below from Community Practitioner, July 2012).
The Underwriting Agreement between the Trust and Northern Lights Distributors, LLC («NLD») provides that the Registrant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold NLD, its several officers and directors, and any person who controls NLD within the meaning of Section 15 of the Securities Act free and harmless from and
against any and all
claims, demands, liabilities and expenses (including the reasonable cost of investigating or defending such
claims, demands or liabilities and any reasonable counsel fees incurred in connection therewith) which NLD, its officers and directors, or any such controlling persons, may incur under the Securities Act, the 1940 Act, or common law or otherwise, arising out of or based upon: (i) any untrue statement, or alleged untrue statement, of a material fact required to be stated in either any Registration Statement or any Prospectus, (ii) any omission, or alleged omission, to state a material fact required to be stated in any Registration Statement or any Prospectus or necessary to
make the statements in any of them not misleading, (iii) the Registrant's failure to maintain an effective Registration statement and Prospectus with respect to Shares of the Funds that are the subject of the
claim or demand, or (iv) the Registrant's failure to provide NLD with
advertising or sales materials to be filed with the FINRA on a timely basis.
Genuine issues of fact precluded summary judgment on a consumer's
claims against a seafood producer for allegedly
making unlawful, false, and misleading
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
advertising regarding the omega - 3 nutrient content of certain of its products in violation of California's Unfair Competition Law (UCL), False
Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014
Advertising Law (FAL), and Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the federal district court in San Jose has ruled (Ogden v. Bumble Bee Food, LLC, January 2, 2014, Koh, L.).
Plaintiff, a dissatisfied attorney, has brought suit
against the entire legal tech industry, alleging that the
claims and promises it
made in 2016 amount to fraud and false
advertising.»