Adding to this site's archived case summaries addressing
advocacy by expert witnesses, reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Kamloops Registry with critical comments about an expert witness.
Adding to this site's archived case summaries addressing
advocacy by expert witnesses, reasons for judgement were released today by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, soundly criticizing an expert witness for a lack of objectivity.
Not exact matches
None of these cases are simple and each of them require strategic litigation, many
witnesses, competent
expert testimony, and zealous
advocacy by an attorney who truly cares about the client.
Adding to this ever growing database of case comments criticizing
expert witnesses for
advocacy, reasons for judgement were released this week
by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, rejecting the evidence of an orthopaedic surgeon hired
by ICBC and providing critical comments about his courtroom testimony.
In my ongoing efforts to highlight judicial criticism of
expert witnesses who stray into
advocacy, reasons for judgement were released today
by the BC Supreme Court, New Westminster Registry, excluding an
expert report for numerous reasons including concerns about plagiarism.
In the latest example of
expert witnesses who cross the line into prohibited
advocacy, reasons for judgement were released this week
by the BC Supreme Court, Vancouver Registry, criticizing a physician for such behavior.