not all essential There is a national organization, called the «65 %» which
advocates at least that amount be spent on the classroom.
Not exact matches
In cases where excess wealth was held until death, he
advocated its apprehension by the state on a progressive scale: «Indeed, it is difficult to set bounds to the share of a rich man's estates which should go
at his death to the public through the agency of the State, and by all means such taxes should be granted, beginning
at nothing upon moderate sums to dependents, and increasing rapidly as the
amounts swell, until of the millionaire's hoard,
at least the other half comes to the privy coffer of the State.»
If Dr Curry's scientific position is «there is a considerable
amount of uncertainty, therefore we should
at least be able to draw some boundaries around them before pushing for a consensus on certainty» (I hope my paraphrase is close to the mark), then
advocating for a change in the process of conducting climate science follows logically.
Delivering the lead judgment in RFC2012 Plc (in liquidation)(formerly The Rangers Football Club Plc) v
Advocate General for Scotland [2017] UKSC 45, Lord Hodge said: «The central issue in this appeal is whether it is necessary that the employee himself or herself should receive, or
at least be entitled to receive, the remuneration for his or her work in order for that reward to
amount to taxable emoluments.»