Sentences with phrase «aerial threats»

Throw in a range of vehicles, aerial threats and the odd hero class or two and you've got a really promising title.

Sporting have some very good players on the wings and one of the biggest aerial threats in the world, so they'll definitely cause Barça problems.

With the aerial threats of Harry Kane and Vincent Janssen to aim for, expect to see more goals from crosses this season.

Since neither Laxalt nor Ninković are defenders by trade, Spalletti had his best aerial threats match up with them (e.g. Rudiger - v - Ninković during El Shaarawy's header in the 67th minute).

At 6ft, 1.5 inches, he is certainly a force in the air and gives Arsenal even more aerial threats and gives another option for a corner other than Per or Giroud.

The skipper was a rock in defense, nullified most of the aerial threats.

Sides that put a lot of faith in set - pieces and are packed with burly aerial threats would fall into this category.

Not much more to say than that, but he can be a great player in terms of passing and aerial threats.

That stable of tight ends — led by SEC all - freshman team selection Albert Okwuegbunam and including Kendall Blanton, Logan Christopherson and Brendan Scales — can be reliable aerial threats, too.

It should be an element of our game we're well drilled at, considering the fact that we have two players who can put the ball on a dime (Santi, Ozil), the amount of free kicks we win in dangerous positions and the aerial threats in the squad.

No physical strength, no aerial threats.

This season, we've had one of the most diverse attacking setups we've had in a long time, yet for some reason we seem to not deploy these setups effectively, for example against Chelsea away, we had seen in their game against Tottenham that they were poor at defending aerial threats, yet we didn't play Giroud.

Mertesacker always a liability when being run at but helps us massively with aerial threats.

I need many will eat me up for this, but don't you think we should start the BFG against WestHam????? W / ham pose aerial threats from free kicks... Mert can organise the defence well and cope with their aerial threats easily...

Importantly, I believe Rhinosacker must have learned in his fallings against Martin Skrtle aerial threats.

Because Petr Cech is suspectable to conceding aerial threats despite his tall height.

Per needs to be used only selectively now when playing sides such as West Brom who rely heavily on an aerial threat

He said it was to increase the aerial threat by having Welbeck and Giroud on but that sort of thing would usually work only in a game where you are pressing forward against a deep sitting defence.

Giroud is slow, but his hold - up is above average and he can bring others into the game and has aerial threat.

Strong, aggressive, aerial threat, tough tackling, decent to explosive pace (Manolas).

Ospina and Co failed to dominate our penalty area when the crosses came in, and I am certain that Cech would have dealt with the aerial threat much better than Ospina.

I'm thinking that we have some excellent crossers that should be able to dime one on her head, and suddenly we'll have an aerial threat we haven't had... well, pretty much ever.

The first question is where he will play and I can fully understand the people that are saying that he does not suit our style as Arsenal are usually faced with a deep lying and determined defence and that is why the hold up and link up play, as well as the aerial threat and physical prowess of Olivier Giroud makes sense.

When Giroud is not in the team it lacks power and aerial threat.

His composed displays at the back and aerial threat going forward have helped Sagnol's side go eight games unbeaten (of which Sane featured in six).

Koscielny was a bit more specific in a report on the Arsenal website, pointing out the power, stature and aerial threat of Liverpool's new front man Christian Benteke as one of the things he most needs to be in control of.

Plus as a striker partnership they'd offer both pace and an aerial threat.

How else would you explain Chambers to be 5 yards away from Skrtel then, if that's man to man marking it's horrible and zonal marking shouldn't even apply to (by far) the biggest aerial threat of the opponnt's team.

Hence his removal deprived us of aerial threat which Giroud possesses in plenty.

He has a bit of an aerial threat which probably wont matter unless a set piece.

We're looking at the next RVP here ladies and gentleman, with a commanding presence in the box, impressive aerial threat and speed (something Giroud doesn't have).

When he's not on the field we lack the ability to hold up the ball, introduce others coming in from mid-field, and provide a genuine aerial threat.

If we don't need to worry about the aerial threat too much, then it's on the break that they'll be looking to get at us with.

The only potential drawback is his height / aerial threat but his speed, finishing & tenacity is exactly what we need

That's another thing to consider, how tall is this CSKA team, if they're mostly a tall team well then they'll be practicing for an aerial threat, esp being away at home and all.

I do not believe it as he put the two lamppost OG and Per on the bench wary of the aerial threat they got and i do think this is why he was left out but pace is the best attack against Westbrom if anyone remember the game back at the emirates when they parked the bus.

Like how Henry was the ultimate in a complete player, rivaling top goal charts as well as the assists, only thing missing was his aerial threat.

It should've been Walcott or Welbeck instead of Ramsey on the wing to provide the threat of pace, with Giroud in the middle to offer an aerial threat.

His handling is very poor, especially against an aerial threat team with a player like Carrol in it.

We need to shut down their crosses into the box so as to neutralise their aerial threat of Ayew and Gomis, so our full backs and wingers will need to be on point.

We have Giroud... IMO the biggest aerial threat in the league.

I definitely know who I would prefer Lewa, Costa, Muller (power, speed, aerial threat, intelligence) and co to face against, and my pick would be Gabriel for this one.

We are back two basically having two CB's and Giroud maybe Xhaka to deal with tall players and aerial threat.

My thoughts... tough away game today but if we keep the balance and don't capitulate to the rugby team tactics, defend positively against the set pieces and aerial threat, then we can defo get a result... COYG!!

He will provide strength and prove to be a nuisance to defenders whilst providing an aerial threat too.

We don't have much choice about our own centre backs but we can at least hope that the absence of Carroll and Cole takes away a lot of their usual aerial threat and perhaps take the pressure of our full backs to cut out crosses.

-:) per could get us a goal with his aerial threat and with his slow long legs he could leave one in and get us a penalty

We must have an aerial threat for set pieces and corners.

He also will have a big part to play against the more physical sides and the ones that provide an aerial threat in their game.

Hull did it yesterday, we did it the week before, QPR did it, Stoke did at the beginning of this season, Sunderland did it the season before that and Mourinho has done it with every clash vs Pellegrini since his return, out of a maximum of 12 points over 2 seasons vs City, Chelsea have taken 8... so it isn't a surprise it worked for us, especially in Toure's absence and the fact that Aguero is diminutive in stature, he isn't an aerial threat.