The relative importance of the
various aerosol components is critical for the aerosol climatic effect, since atmospheric aerosols behave differently when their chemical composition changes.
The pH of PM 2.5 particles can't be directly measured, so scientists must infer their acidity by studying the distribution of atmospheric species that can be measured and are highly sensitive to the value of the particle pH. This requires modeling, which can be checked by studying compounds — such
as aerosol components and gas - phase components — that can be directly measured.
To calculate how much of the sun's radiation is reaching solar arrays on the ground, the scientists used what's called a solar photovoltaic performance model, combined with satellite data from NASA instruments that measure irradiance from the sun and
analyze aerosol components and clouds in the atmosphere.
For example, if we look at the past century and a half, we have an * instrumentally observed * TCR of ~ 0.7 C for a radiative forcing that is also quite well know (except for its pesky
anthopogenic aerosol component).
In general,
primary aerosol components (black carbon, hydrocarbon - like organic aerosol and biomass burning organic aerosol) dominated the local traffic and wood burning emissions whereas secondary components (oxygenated organic aerosol, nitrate, ammonium, and sulfate) dominated the PM1 chemical composition during the LRT episode.
The present 3 - D modeling study focuses on aerosol chemical composition change since preindustrial times considering the secondary organic aerosol formation together with all other
main aerosol components including nitrate.
Hence, the mechanism appears to show why both twenty - first century and time - invariant CO2 forcing lead to similar values of φ in climate models despite the presence of transient ocean heat uptake, whereas twentieth century forcing — which has a significant spatially confined anthropogenic
tropospheric aerosol component that breaches the first condition — leads to modelled values of φ that vary widely amongst models and in time.
In order to investigate the secondary organic aerosol (SOA) response to changes in biogenic volatile organic compounds (VOC) emissions in the future atmosphere and how important will SOA be relative to the major
anthropogenic aerosol component (sulfate), the global three - dimensional chemistry / transport model TM3 has been used.
The study of Liu et al. (2012) is cited for it description of the new modal aerosol model introduced in the global climate model CAM5 (Liu et al., 2012), which simulates aerosol size distributions, the mixing of
aerosol components, aerosol properties and their complex interaction with cloud processes in a more realistic manner.
Also, if I can find an aerosol forcing model, I'll add
the aerosol component for 1910 to 1945 to the calculation.
Read my other posts on aerosols since I agree with you that
aerosol component had low leverage in the 1910 to 1945 period.
-- Atmospheric models have improved and many now represent
all aerosol components of significance.
In essence, you need to simulate the so - called adjusted forcing, or the forcing efficacy for
each aerosol component (which takes these effects into account).