Bauer, S.E., K. Tsigaridis, and R.L. Miller, 2016: Significant atmospheric
aerosol pollution caused by world food cultivation.
Not exact matches
In particular, they propose that cloud changes associated with
aerosol particles in the atmosphere could be
causing the weekend effect, though other
pollution processes can not be ruled out at this time.
During this event, the
aerosols stayed close to the surface due to the presence of a anticyclone hovering over the study region at sea - level, «reducing the amount of shortwave irradiance reaching the surface and
causing greater radiative cooling,» states Obregón, who likens the effects of desert dust with those resulting from certain forest fires or episodes of high
pollution.
Indeed, conventional wisdom held that higher levels of
aerosol pollution in the atmosphere should cool the earth's climate because
aerosols can increase cloudiness; they not only reduce precipitation, which raises the water content in clouds, but they also increase the size of the individual water droplets, which in turn
causes more warming sunlight to be reflected back into space.
«A rapid cutback in greenhouse gas emissions could speed up global warming... because current global warming is offset by global dimming — the 2 - 3ºC of cooling
cause by industrial
pollution, known to scientists as
aerosol particles, in the atmosphere.»
One suggestion that had been made some years ago — that the cooling may be
caused by shading the sun by
aerosol pollution — did not show up in the discussion on Saturday.
One theory is the decline in temperature from 1940 to 1970 was due to increased
aerosols from
pollution that
caused a negative feedback.
The reason greenhouse gases can be (and probably are) responsible for more than 100 % of the observed warming is that other factors (mainly human
aerosol pollution) have
caused cooling at the same time.
You have one basic misunderstandiing about global dimming, it is not
caused by CO2 but by SO2 and particulate
pollution, what are called
aerosols.
We always thought that — apart of course from soot [15 % of climate warming]-- such
aerosol pollution creates cooling — as in the case of Chinese sulfur
pollution and the Asian (Indian) brown cloud — and that air quality measures over recent decades in North America and Europe are now actually a major
cause of increased warming speeds there — as the actual temperature catches up on the «CO2 baseline».
This is as to be expected, since continued efforts to reduce atmospheric
aerosols in the West have resulted in less dimming (more warming), while in the East increasing
pollution has
caused more dimming (less warming).
As it turns out, forcings that have tended to
cause cooling, like increased
aerosol pollution, are particularly efficient.
There, he co-authored an article for Science arguing that the warming effect
caused by rising amounts of carbon - dioxide in the atmosphere would be swamped by the cooling effect
caused by
aerosol pollution like dust and smoke.
Atmospheric
aerosol pollution, mixed with natural
aerosols in the context of human
caused global warming presents some interesting and extremely important challenges for consideration.
This is true, and has been attributed to higher levels of
pollution aerosol particles, which commonly
cause 20 % decreases in UV - B radiation in the summer (Wenny et.
Aerosols, that include dust, soot and sulphate particles, consist of solid or liquid particles suspended in air, are classic
causes of air
pollution.
We also emit conventional
pollution,
causing black soot and
aerosols that have differing (and debated) effects on climate.
Cooling from 1940 - 1975 is widely understood to have been
caused by
aerosols (ie
pollution) from unregulated industry and transportation.