Adultery does not affect child support awards in Pennsylvania, but might
affect child custody arrangements.
Factors that may
affect child custody arrangements in Massachusetts include:
If you or your former spouse have any form of criminal record, it can definitely
affect your child custody arrangement.
Not exact matches
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the
child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the
child; (3) the preferences of each
child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to
custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the
child with each parent, the
child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly
affect the best interest of the
child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent
child relationship between the
child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the
child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the
child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the
child; (10) the
child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the
child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of
custody unless the proposed custodial
arrangement is not in the best interest of the
child; (13) the
child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the
child or a sibling of the
child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or
child abuse or the effect on the
child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the
child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the
child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary.
To request a modification of
custody or visitation
arrangements, a parent has to show the court that there is a substantial change in circumstances that
affects the
child's welfare.
Ultimately, the
child's mental and physical well being are the court's primary concern when deciding
custody arrangements, and therefore any extenuating circumstances that
affect the
child will be taken into consideration.
The type of
custody arrangement a couple agrees upon or is decided by the court can drastically
affect how parents care for their
children in the future.
Virginia has adopted the best interests of the
child standard, in which a judge examines how a proposed
custody arrangement will
affect a
child's well - being.
Changing Residences / Mobility: Sometimes, the
child custody and access
arrangements in place are
affected when a party is changing residences.
The natural parents may seek visitation when it does not
affect the health and safety of the
child, and the natural parents may later seek a change in the
custody arrangement.
«Parents often focus on the importance of scheduling and
child custody arrangements and don't often think enough about their own interpersonal relationships and how they can
affect the
children,» Silbert tells AdvocateDaily.com.
In joint legal
custody arrangements, a move will not
affect decision - making authority; thus, both parents must still participate in making decisions about the
child.
Additionally, such changes must
affect the welfare of the
child so that it would be in the
child's best interest to change the
custody arrangement.
This would seriously
affect the
children's relationship with their other parent, so the existing parenting plan or
custody arrangement would require tweaking to accommodate such a move, if the court allows it at all.
For instance, if there are
children involved, making the decision to divorce can be much more complicated because there are many more issues to deal with such as parenting plans,
custody arrangements,
child support, and, of course, how the divorce will
affect the
children.
Generally, most court - mandated
custody arrangements will be based on how various factors in the household
affect the
children.
Custody arrangements can
affect who claims the
children as dependents on your tax return.The good news is you are free to negotiate this in mediation.
If there is a joint
custody arrangement, the school should require the consent of both parents for all major decisions that
affect the
child.
Child custody laws in your state will greatly
affect the outcome of your
custody arrangement.
Shared
custody agreements tend to be more complicated than sole
custody arrangements because the amount of time that the
child spends with each parent can
affect child support awards as well as the
child's legal residence for school.
Divorce
Custody Court - ordered custody arrangements are based on various factors in the household and how they affect the ch
Custody Court - ordered
custody arrangements are based on various factors in the household and how they affect the ch
custody arrangements are based on various factors in the household and how they
affect the
children.
From a
child's perspective, a joint
custody arrangement may negatively
affect the following relationships in a
child's life:
To obtain full
custody of her
children, a mother must demonstrate that a different
custody arrangement would negatively
affect them.
(1) the temperament and developmental needs of the
child; (2) the capacity and the disposition of the parents to understand and meet the needs of the
child; (3) the preferences of each
child; (4) the wishes of the parents as to
custody; (5) the past and current interaction and relationship of the
child with each parent, the
child's siblings, and any other person, including a grandparent, who may significantly
affect the best interest of the
child; (6) the actions of each parent to encourage the continuing parent
child relationship between the
child and the other parent, as is appropriate, including compliance with court orders; (7) the manipulation by or coercive behavior of the parents in an effort to involve the
child in the parents» dispute; (8) any effort by one parent to disparage the other parent in front of the
child; (9) the ability of each parent to be actively involved in the life of the
child; (10) the
child's adjustment to his or her home, school, and community environments; (11) the stability of the
child's existing and proposed residences; (12) the mental and physical health of all individuals involved, except that a disability of a proposed custodial parent or other party, in and of itself, must not be determinative of
custody unless the proposed custodial
arrangement is not in the best interest of the
child; (13) the
child's cultural and spiritual background; (14) whether the
child or a sibling of the
child has been abused or neglected; (15) whether one parent has perpetrated domestic violence or
child abuse or the effect on the
child of the actions of an abuser if any domestic violence has occurred between the parents or between a parent and another individual or between the parent and the
child; (16) whether one parent has relocated more than one hundred miles from the
child's primary residence in the past year, unless the parent relocated for safety reasons; and (17) other factors as the court considers necessary
However, when a parent's remarriage
affects the
custody arrangement, this can
affect child support.
In making an equitable apportionment of marital property, the family court must give weight in such proportion as it finds appropriate to all of the following factors: (1) the duration of the marriage along with the ages of the parties at the time of the marriage and at the time of the divorce; (2) marital misconduct or fault of either or both parties, if the misconduct
affects or has
affected the economic circumstances of the parties or contributed to the breakup of the marriage; (3) the value of the marital property and the contribution of each spouse to the acquisition, preservation, depreciation, or appreciation in value of the marital property, including the contribution of the spouse as homemaker; (4) the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets; (5) the health, both physical and emotional, of each spouse; (6) either spouse's need for additional training or education in order to achieve that spouse's income potential; (7) the non marital property of each spouse; (8) the existence or nonexistence of vested retirement benefits for each or either spouse; (9) whether separate maintenance or alimony has been awarded; (10) the desirability of awarding the family home as part of equitable distribution or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to the spouse having
custody of any
children; (11) the tax consequences to each or either party as a result of equitable apportionment; (12) the existence and extent of any prior support obligations; (13) liens and any other encumbrances upon the marital property and any other existing debts; (14)
child custody arrangements and obligations at the time of the entry of the order; and (15) such other relevant factors as the trial court shall expressly enumerate in its order.