Not exact matches
(See Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5) I chose this particular book because I think it provides the most accessible and personal introduction to the
biblical and historical arguments in support of same - sex relationships, and because Matthew is a theologically conservative Christian who
affirms the
authority of Scripture and who is also gay.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e.,
Biblical authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8 Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view
Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand
Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider
Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the
Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it
affirms.
I chose this particular book because I think it provides the most accessible and personal introduction to the
biblical and historical arguments in support of same - sex relationships, and because Matthew is a theologically conservative Christian who
affirms the
authority of Scripture and who is also gay.
To do that we need some label that distinguishes us from Protestants who abandon
biblical authority, neglect evangelism and fail to
affirm historic Christian doctrines.
They also found themselves confronting
biblical passages which
affirmed the value of the state — or, at the very least, of the official political
authorities — and ascribed to it a divine origin.