[5] For example, Justice Dunphy noted that even if the truck driver were examined and
provided affirmative answers to the questions above, it could not be assumed that his or her evidence would be accepted «as the last word» by the court.
Our analysis of religion and of the meaning of inspiration would suggest
an affirmative answer to this question.
One way of avoiding
an affirmative answer to this question is to observe that the judicial decisions at issue are gross misinterpretations of the Constitution.
An affirmative answer to this question receives some confirmation from the fact that within the immediate context we find some other words and phrases which point to the influence of the Baal cult on the language of Hosea and his contemporaries.
One's acceptance of the story as true does not depend upon one's giving
an affirmative answer to that question.
This of course does not imply
an affirmative answer to the question «Does God exist?»
Since Whitehead required that his categories be «applicable» (PR 3), this distinction implies
an affirmative answer to the question posed earlier «whether there are primary organisms which are incapable of further analysis» (SMW 103).
This requires agreement of at least three quarters of the states, so it perhaps does not qualify as
an affirmative answer to your question.
If one assumes that respondents were more likely to say that they were circumcised (ie, the default answer is to give
an affirmative answer to any question) and that the same people report higher levels of STDs, this may account for any association found.
It is abundantly clear that the majority of studies conducted to date favor
an affirmative answer to this question.
Grantham, whom we greatly admire for his courage and investment acumen, famously announced in late May 2017 that high valuations are here to stay, offering
an affirmative answer to the question: Is the tried - and - true hammer of value investors — comparing CAPE to its historical statistics — broken?
«Fair comment,» for example, would require
an affirmative answer to the question: «could anyone honestly express that opinion on the proved facts?»
The analysis in AG Whatelet's Opinion does not support
an affirmative answer to these questions.
Sales appears to presuppose
an affirmative answer to this question — because Parliament is to be taken to have legislated against the background of (and so to have assented to) the then - operative principles of judicial review.