If the self that acts or thinks were a part of what is experienced, then Koestler believes we could not
affirm human freedom.
It is true that Descartes, a classical theist, did unequivocally
affirm human freedom, as did Arminius, but neither of them removed the contradiction between this freedom and the timeless perfection of the deity which knows the free act.
Not exact matches
However, our discussion and defense of Plantinga has shown that, when worked out coherently, the classical theist must
affirm a notion of omnipotence practically identical to that of the process theist — i.e., our discussion demonstrates that the classical theist must, like the process theist, acknowledge that
human freedom places necessary limits upon God's power in both the moral and natural realms.
Unlike the propagators of the Maria Goretti model, who enjoined girls to embrace virginity for its own sake out of deference to ecclesiastical authority, Dohen
affirmed that the consecrated virgin freely chooses to sacrifice marriage, which she called «the greatest natural means to holiness and the source of the greatest
human love» for the sake of «something else» (Vocation to Love [Sheed & Ward, 1950], p. 56) In her writings, that «something else» appears to include the spiritual status of a «bride of Christ,» lonely confrontations with God and, above all, the
freedom and detachment necessary to serve God in the world.
The Declaration «
affirms the worth, dignity and autonomy of the individual and the right of every
human being to the greatest possible
freedom compatible with the rights of others».
The Basingers believe «that most influential classical theists — e.g., Augustine, Aquinas, Luther, Calvin — have
affirmed I - omnipotence»; they go on to say that «unfortunately, Plantinga, himself, has not explicitly acknowledged the fact that his analysis of the relation between divine sovereignty and
human freedom is basically an attack upon, not a defense of, the view of omnipotence that most classical theists seem to hold.»
Modernity's emphasis on secularism involves three elements - a) the desacralisation of nature which produced a nature devoid of spirits preparing the way for its scientific analysis and technological control and use; b) desacralisation of society and state by liberating them from the control of established authority and laws of religion which often gave spiritual sanction to social inequality and stifled
freedom of reason and conscience of persons; it was necessary to
affirm freedom and equality as fundamental rights of all persons and to enable common action in politics and society by adherents of all religions and none in a religiously pluralistic society; and c) an abandonment of an eternally fixed sacred order of
human society enabling ordering of secular social affairs on the basis of rational discussion.
The only solution to the problem of evil «worth writing home about» is one in which
human freedom is not only
affirmed but is also «a special, intensified, magnified form of a general principle pervasive of reality, down to the very atoms and still farther.
In 2002, at the 50th anniversary of the World Humanist Congress in Amsterdam, the gathered participants signed a declaration
affirming «the worth, dignity and autonomy of the individual and the right of every
human being to the greatest possible
freedom compatible with the rights of others».
This stance puts me in opposition to those humanists who regard religion as an illusion, who seek to negate the divine reality as the necessary precondition for
affirming the humanist gospel of
human freedom, and who interpret the history of religion as only an instrument of oppression and dehumanization.
It seems unobscure that the species of
human freedom endorsed here precludes, at the very least, an immediate movement from ontology to ethics, from the «is» to the «ought,» without the intermediate operation of our functionally ultimate valuation — thus
affirming, in part, Sartre's claim: «Ontology itself can not formulate ethical precepts.»
The «early» Barth
affirmed a version of the sovereignty of God that came close to precluding
human freedom from the start.
It is
human freedom rather than reason that is clearly
affirmed as the essence of
human reality.
The implications of the constitutive relationality
affirmed in CiV are stunning: no relations taken up by
human beings in the course of their lives are purely contractual, -LSB-...]
freedom is an act of choice only as already embedded in an order of naturally given relations (cf. 68) to God, family, others, and nature.
«As a church we will continue to work to up - hold our core Christian beliefs as bible - believing Christians,
affirming God's love for all
human beings, and looking to the Bible for guidance in our faith and conduct — while being sensitive to other faiths and encouraging
freedom of religion and belief for all.
So rarely have men faced the full range of questions demanding answer if
human freedom is to be
affirmed, that in our day philosophers and their critics alike have declared that the idea of
freedom is not capable of being expressed in philosophic terms.
Two traits of classical theism were that it either (like Stoicism and Spinozism) clearly and consistently denied
human freedom (in the straightforward sense of actions being not wholly determined by their causal conditions) or else ambiguously or contradictorily
affirmed and denied causal determinism — truly classically in Aquinas's statement that God strictly causes our actions but in such fashion that we were also free to act otherwise.
When you work for Planned Parenthood you make a difference in the lives of those we serve by
affirming the
human right to reproductive health and
freedom.