It's no secret that «regular» schools serving predominantly poor children, who face overwhelming challenges that
affluent children never have to confront, have more than their share of behavior problems.
Not exact matches
«Aregbesola's mission in education is to democratize it and bring it to the poor who could possibly
never have been opportune to be educated along
children of the
affluent in Nigeria.»
Yet we should also concede that intact families, communities with strong social capital, and households with plentiful resources for good health care, healthy meals, enrichment programs, and the like give
affluent children an advantage that most of their poor peers will
never be able to overcome.
Connecticut seems to accept a constricted vision of education for its neediest
children that is
never imposed on more
affluent districts.
First, I've
never met a layperson who doesn't think that they need no more than a «simple will» when in fact they often do, either because they are
affluent, or have a blended family, or need testamentary trusts to manage property for
children or young adults or black sheep or for tax purposes or because some family members are non-citizens.