Schools that serve both poor and
affluent students tend to have an enormous range in student achievement levels, which makes it hard for teachers to instruct all students together.
Not exact matches
Since a significant share of school funding is local, and communities with lots of
students from
affluent backgrounds
tend to be
affluent communities that pay more in taxes, «good schools» also
tend to be better funded.
This is particularly important for low - income
students, who
tend to learn most content in school and, unlike
affluent children of college - educated parents, generally do not get to benefit from trips to museums, story times at the library, and other opportunities.
Schools with more
affluent student bodies
tend to produce high test scores.
It's unclear whether higher - scoring teachers lead to higher - scoring
students or whether
affluent districts, which
tend to have higher - achieving
students, also
tend to hire teachers with higher scores.
Parent fundraising
tends to exacerbate inequity, since schools with more
affluent families are able to raise much more per
student.
We might not be surprised to find a
student newsroom in
affluent or resource - rich school districts, where journalism programs
tend to be popular.
Students in schools serving predominantly low - income families tend to endure teacher absence at a higher rate than students in more affluent comm
Students in schools serving predominantly low - income families
tend to endure teacher absence at a higher rate than
students in more affluent comm
students in more
affluent communities.
Robert Crosnoe and others have noted that, because
students are evaluated relative to their peers in the same school, poor
students transferred to more
affluent institutions
tend to experience a «frog pond effect,» losing out to more capable and sophisticated
students in the competition for grades and social standing, and reporting a decline in self - perception and emotional well - being.
The impact can be especially consequential for economically disadvantaged
students, who
tend to enter school trailing behind their more
affluent peers academically, continue to lag as they proceed through each grade, and have fewer opportunities outside of school for learning.
The first seeks to reduce the number of high - poverty schools, which
tend to be segregated both by class and race, by dispersing
students from poor families to schools with predominantly middle - class or
affluent students.
This is particularly important for low - income
students, who
tend to learn most content in school and, unlike
affluent children of college - educated parents, generally do not benefit from trips to museums, story times at the library, and other opportunities.
Since poverty and race are closely tied in the United States, African - American and Latino
students are at a significant disadvantage to the White
students who
tend to live in more
affluent communities.
Ohio's «2011 - 12 value - added results show that districts, schools and teachers with large numbers of poor
students tend to have lower value - added results than those that serve more -
affluent ones.»
Ms. Hoxby's study found that the charter - school
students, who
tend to come from poor and disadvantaged families, scored almost as well as
students in the
affluent Scarsdale school district in the suburbs north of the city.
In particular, low - income
students and
students of color
tend to benefit more from using a school voucher than their more
affluent, white peers.