The union saw this as proof that the district could
afford raises for teachers and that some unpopular budget cuts, such as increases in class size, were unnecessary.
Not exact matches
Against this backdrop, it's tough
for Republican governors to insist, «Well, sure, our party's leaders in Washington can find huge dollars
for tax cuts and defense, but we can't
afford a pay
raise for struggling, hard - working
teachers.»
Opponents also argue that we can't
afford to take any money out of the public system when the Legislature has refused to pay
for smaller class sizes and
teacher raises as provided by Initiative 728 and Initiative 732 in recent years.
From a practical standpoint, a $ 20,000
raise — which
for me would represent a 25 % increase — would reduce the financial burden on
teachers who often can't
afford to stay in this profession, particularly in a city as expensive as New York.
I agree — when times are good there is no reason that
teachers shouldn't be
afforded decent
raises — and not have to fight
for them.
Apart from
raising teacher pay, we should expand the use of other strategies to attract talent, such as forgivable tuition loans, service fellowships, hardship pay
for the most - challenging settings (an approach that works well in the military and the foreign service), and housing and child - care subsidies
for teachers, many of whom can't
afford to live in the communities in which they teach.