... If tort reform succeeds in capping attorneys» fees and recovery, would potential PI claimants have as much trouble as finding
an affordable lawyer as workers» comp claimants in North Dakota?»
At Neota Logic, one of our goals is to encourage professionals to use our technology to address the vast, unfulfilled demand for their expertise — the «excluded majority» (some have said up to 80 % of businessmen and women in the USA, 54 % of all small businesses and 33 % of consumers in the UK, along with the unquantified number of people and firms in other countries across the world) who do not have access to
an affordable lawyer when they need one.
By advocating the use of alternative legal services a law society declares to that majority: «Never again will you have
an affordable lawyer who will do all the work needed to deal with your legal problems.
Still, would it not usually be better if the client could get
an affordable lawyer to do the work?
The divisive and often emotion - charged debate is being played out against a backdrop of a legal system so short of
affordable lawyers that Canadian courts are becoming clogged with self - represented litigants.
There's this contradiction: the taxpayer who pays for LAO's increased funding, but can not have
an affordable lawyer, but earns too much to qualify for a legal aid certificate for free or supplemented legal services, pays for the justice system whereat all lawyers earn a very good living, directly or indirectly, in comparison with the average income of taxpayers.
Anyone in Massachusetts know
an affordable lawyer for an eviction?