The usual theory posits that consumer demand for affordable legal services far outstrips the supply of
affordable legal service providers, more so in rural and remote areas.
Not exact matches
To compete with
legal service providers who are offering commodity
services, lawyers must offer more
affordable services.
«The solution is to use numerous different technologies — including the ones that we're building — to bridge that gap and increase the supply of
affordable legal services by increasing the productivity of
legal service providers.
The law societies do not give sufficient importance to the interactions among: (1) the problem and its consequences — the thousands of people whose lives have been damaged for lack of
affordable legal services provided by competent lawyers; (2) the power of the internet, the social media, and the news media together, to make those consequences into a public and political issue so quickly that there will not be time for the law societies to publish a persuasive response, and which issue will compel government intervention by way of programs on the way to socialized law; (3) the fact that self - regulation of the
legal profession has been lost by the law societies in several jurisdictions of the common law world and the U.S; [7] and, (4) the fact that the consequences of the unavailability of
legal services at reasonable cost will motivate the many non-lawyer
legal service providers to offer
legal services that should be provided by lawyers, to people desperate for a lawyer's
services that they can not afford.
Justice Bridge strives to coordinate with bar associations,
legal service providers, law firms and community organizations to help deliver quality,
affordable representation, while reducing the growing number of individuals representing themselves in our family, housing and probate courts.»
To stay competitive in the consumer and small business market,
legal service providers and companies will need to adopt the latest technologies and platforms to deliver
affordable and on - demand
legal services.
In the same way, Georgetown University Law Center students and other students in the
Legal Services Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal guid
Legal Services Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal g
Services Corporation's Apps4Justice Project are creating applications with not - for - profit
legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal guid
legal services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for affordable, practical, accessible legal g
services providers that meet an otherwise unmet demand for
affordable, practical, accessible
legal guid
legal guidance.
The Access
Legal Care «system» is based on 12 key components: 1) be profitable for the attorneys and legal - services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and cli
Legal Care «system» is based on 12 key components: 1) be profitable for the attorneys and
legal - services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and cli
legal -
services providers; 2) apply the Pareto principle — focus on the 20 % of all
legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already affordable); 3) process - map the remaining services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and cli
legal services that 80 % of lower - and moderate - income people will likely ever need; then prune / refer - out those that are high - complexity / high - dollar (too risky) and contingency cases (already
affordable); 3) process - map the remaining
services into individual steps; 4) functionally - decompose each process step to the lowest - cost
provider who can perform the step legally and with excellence; 5) streamline processes with Six Sigma and manufacturing principles; 6) centralize operations for economies of scale; 7) collaborate and out - source to expand reach; 8) leverage technology to minimize costs and maximize productivity; 9) make
affordable with both terms and price; 10) generate high demand, high - volume; 11) develop multiple revenue streams; and 12) package up the system and re-sell it to other law firms and clinics.
A crop of well - capitalized, tech and process savvy
providers and entrepreneurs offer
affordable legal services to the tens of million Americans and small businesses that are otherwise priced out of the market.