FFLC provides
affordable legal services such as divorce, alimony, time sharing (custody and visitation) rights, marital property distribution, and post divorce litigation.
Not exact matches
That is because materials and supplies no matter how very expertly and cost - efficiently delivered to an obsolescent method of producing a product (
such as the way in which
legal services are produced), can not make the product
affordable, and therefore, neither can «apps» within the law office.
But they will do nothing to make
legal advise
services affordable for people who can not afford
such services.
But
legal services would have to be made
affordable before
such promotions could be launched.
The A.G. of Ontario at the
Legal Innovation Zone (LIZ): there are now many sources developing such «apps» for the intended purpose of making legal services afford
Legal Innovation Zone (LIZ): there are now many sources developing
such «apps» for the intended purpose of making
legal services afford
legal services affordable.
Given
such is the case, perhaps a triage approach may be what's needed to make justice / the
legal system more approachable,
affordable and accessible with checks to improve quality of
service throughout the process.
In addition to the benefits that unbundling provides for attorneys, it also increases access to justice by making
affordable legal services available to a larger segment of the public who are actively seeking
such assistance online.
Nowhere does either webpage say, «however, these are the proactive steps that we are taking to make
legal services affordable,» followed by a list of
such «steps» in proof of being sufficiently proactive.
This is an important lesson for law firms, because other online
legal services such as UpCounsel are already on the scene attracting startups, small business owners, and entrepreneurs with
affordable and convenient unbundled
legal services.
She also believes smaller firms
such as hers can offer a strong value proposition to clients struggling to find
affordable legal services in Toronto's downtown core.
But solicitors can still provide
affordable services in certain areas,
such as witnessing statutory declarations, administering oaths and providing
legal advice.
Then, along with a handful of other
such corporations, having driven the small firm solicitors to extinction — the ones who deliver the most
affordable, cost - effective
legal services — they will then begin to forever charge far, far more for those same
services than the small firm lawyers ever did.
In response to
such rapid growth of free and
affordable alternatives to traditionally high priced
legal services, LegalZoom has filed a lawsuit.
CanLII can finance
such an advisory institute to advise all law societies as to the many ways that costs can be cut so as to make
legal services affordable while competence is maintained.
Blame law societies for the unaffordable
legal services problem because: (1) everything they do in regard to the problem is aimed at helping the public get used to living with the problem,
such as promoting «alternative
legal services,» but nothing is done to try to solve the problem; and, (2) law societies do not sponsor the innovations necessary to make
legal services affordable again.
With the development of
such support
services, law societies can themselves make
legal services affordable.
We are able to offer
affordable legal services because matters
such as the modification of child support are black and white issues.
Online
legal service marketplaces
such as Asia Law Network help to organise a fragmented
legal industry by providing information about the expertise and fees of
legal professionals on a single platform, thereby connecting individuals with
affordable legal advice.
More specifically, the Issues Paper describes that the group «Regulatory Opportunities» is charged with studying existing regulatory innovations,
such as alternative business structures and the Canada Bar Association's
Legal Futures Initiative Report, and then recommending «regulatory innovations that improve the delivery of, and the public's access to, competent and affordable legal services.&r
Legal Futures Initiative Report, and then recommending «regulatory innovations that improve the delivery of, and the public's access to, competent and
affordable legal services.&r
legal services.»
Rather than providing coherent ways to deliver
affordable legal services, based on concepts
such as efficiency and increasing quality, they are seen as an extra burden to practicing law.
No longer can they adequately regulate the
legal profession without a civil
service to advise and carry out major law society - sponsored
services,
such as the innovations in the production of
legal services that would make
legal services again
affordable to the majority of society.
Those very second - best alternatives collectively tell taxpayers that they are going to have to accept them, in place of
affordable legal advice
services that are sufficiently
affordable such that they can be provided by a lawyer who will do all of the
legal work necessary to obtaining the best that the rule of law can provide.
I understand these feelings, but feel bound to point out that neither empirical evidence nor research support
such statements — and neither answers the pressing question of access to
affordable legal services.
Seeking
affordable legal services is critical to protecting your rights regarding matters
such as alimony, child support and equitable marital property distribution.