Sentences with phrase «affords couples more»

Let us not forget that AFC has not been pushing the sales of many average players, this has kept our wage bill high while increasing year after year, pushing the bar higher and IF AFC can get some of those players sold then AFC will have no problem at all in not only paying Alexis and Ozil what they want, we can afford a couple more WC wages.

Not exact matches

A couple of hours a week will buy you time to market your business and soon you will find yourself utilizing your VA more often AND affording their services more easily.

She has seen many instances where couples have borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars more than they can truly afford in their monthly budget.

this is causing crime with is bad for business, i do not like having to chase down a man iv known for years for a dine and dash because he could not afford food doe to medical bills, only to give him more medical bills for punching him a couple times for trying to steal form me.

It would create more deadline tourists, teams that could afford to swing in and ditch a couple of pending free agents before spending wildly in the offseason.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

It's probably a couple million more per year higher than anyone else would spend but we can certainly afford it.

-- Buy one or two players for A LOT of Money and buy a couple more at mid range to low — Buy low cost and mid-range players develop them and sell them to big clubs — make only bargain acquisitions, sell your star players to big clubs and take loanees — Buy only expensive superstars sell fringe players to smaller clubs — Buy who you can afford and take players on loan — groom players and sell them for big money and always buy cheap — Buy only the players you need — Buy outside Europe — Buy NO ONE — Use some other strategy we don't know about

Chinese Laundry does trendy so well, and they're usually priced fairly... you can afford to buy a couple of bags,... Read More

I'm happily adding this dress to my wedding guest rotation, and because of the price can afford to add a couple more too!!

When your first or next payday comes around, even if you can only afford to buy a couple of very basic t - shirts you'll be able to add far more outfits into the mix.

The Short Version: Some couples delay taking that romantic vacation together because they don't think they can afford it... (read more)

This annual occasion, which falls on the 14th February, is recognized in many countries and affords couples the opportunity to share their love, celebrate their union and be more thoughtful and...

This annual occasion, which falls on the 14th February, is recognized in many countries and affords couples the opportunity to share their love, celebrate their union and be more thoughtful and affectionate than perhaps they usually are.

The Short Version: Some couples delay taking that romantic vacation together because they don't think they can afford... (read more)

We get it, you can't afford anything more than a couple hundred dollars per month.

If you want a new car every couple of years or you want something that costs more than you could afford, you might consider leasing.

I can not stress enough how important reviews are to persuading buyers; the more Amazon reviews you have, coupled with regular sales, will afford you with increased visibility to potential buyers.

If you have multiple books then you can afford to have a couple of higher priced books, while having one or two books priced at $ 0.99 c or $ 1.99 serving as the top of your funnel to more expensive titles.

The convenient repayment terms, more generous cash amounts and the high approval rates for our installment loans which make them an attractive alternative for those who don't want too or can't afford to pay the installment loan back in just a couple weeks.

Next we turn to the Coopers, a Vancouver couple, both close to 70, who can afford to spend more than double what the Taylors do.

A handful came from young couples with incomes of $ 200,000 or more a year who seemed genuinely perplexed about why they couldn't afford all the toys they would like right away.

The goal of the menu was to create a place where families could afford to eat more than once a week and that would still appeal to couples out for a special night on the town.

Personally I would vote for you losing a couple more tenderness point as a penalty, not that you can afford to lose even a fraction of one.

It is useful to quote key observations by Stadlen J [at paras 126 - 129]: «In my view, notwithstanding the absence in the FTPP proceedings of some of the statutory and non-statutory safeguards which apply to criminal proceedings... [I] n deciding whether it would be fair to admit the hearsay evidence, the requirements both of Article 6 and of the common law obliged the FTPP to take into account the absence of all those [safeguards]... [I] n my judgment, no reasonable panel in the position of the FTPP could have reasonably concluded that there were factors outweighing the powerful factors pointing against the admission of the hearsay evidence... The means by which the claimant can challenge the hearsay evidence are... not in my judgment capable of outweighing those factors... The reality would appear to be that the factor which the FTPP considered decisive in favour of admitting the hearsay evidence was the serious nature of the allegations against the claimant coupled with the public interest in investigating such allegations and the FTPP's duty to protect the public interest in protecting patients, maintaining public confidence in the profession and declaring and upholding proper standards of behaviour... However, that factor on its own does not in my view diminish the weight which must be attached to the procedural safeguards to which a person accused of such allegations is entitled both at common law and under Article 6... The more serious the allegation, the greater the importance of ensuring that the accused doctor is afforded fair and proper procedural safeguards.

Most people can't afford those premiums, however, this could also be an option for people with terminal medical conditions who need life insurance at any cost and plan to maintain coverage for only a couple more years.

Most of the time, a family or retired couple can now afford to pay a home loan on a lot more «house» than at anytime in the past.

In doing so, the couple is able to afford a much larger death benefit for the same amount of money, which can help their heirs manage final expenses and inheritance taxes while also leaving them more money for the future.

Perhaps more importantly, it could mean the difference between the couple ending up in court representing themselves because they believe they can not afford mediation rather than in mediation where will be focusing on how they can reach solutions together and improve their communication.

It can be a more affordable option for couples who want to ensure they have everything in order, or individuals who can not afford full representation but still want ongoing assistance.

Due to the state of the economy, more and more couples are getting divorced and can't afford to live apart during the divorce process — and sometimes even afterwards.

But when partners more closely resemble each other's ideal selves, couples fare better — above and beyond the benefit to the relationship afforded by how similar you are in actuality, says Caryl Rusbult, a psychologist at the Free University of Amsterdam.

Additionally, we have contracted with MBHP and Tricare making our services accessible to more families in the community, including military families and folks who could not afford couples therapy treatment of this caliber in the past.

Slow and Steady: $ 100K should be more than enough to afford down payments on a couple small multifamily units.

So, I said, let me pick a couple of houses that I believe WILL appeal to you (we had confirmed they could afford to spend more, just preferred not to — and that is totally understandable).

This is a primary question and should also be coupled with two more questions; What should I afford and what can I not afford.