In contrast, animals initiated with a low -
aflatoxin dose actually produced substantially more foci when subsequently fed the 20 % protein diet.
We investigated this question by giving two groups of rats either a high -
aflatoxin dose or a low -
aflatoxin dose, along with a standard baseline diet.
Then, during the promotion phase, we fed a low - protein diet to the high -
aflatoxin dose groups and a high - protein diet to the low -
aflatoxin dose group.
Animals starting with the most cancer initiation (high -
aflatoxin dose) developed substantially less foci when fed the 5 % protein diet.
When
the aflatoxin dose is more moderate, animals eating a low - protein diet develop cancer while their higher - protein counterparts remain in mighty fine health.
Not exact matches
Madhavan and Gopalan (1968) fed rats a daily
dose of
aflatoxin with either 5 % (LP) or 20 % (HP) casein.
Both of these studies involved an «initiation» period that preceded and coincided with an acute
dose of
aflatoxin and a «promotion» period that followed.
In more realistic models where the rats were
dosed with smaller (but still large) amounts of
aflatoxin every day, the low - protein diets proved fatal, even in adulthood.
Mainigi and Campbell (1980) tried feeding 20 % casein and 5 % casein (5C) to rats, spiked with 5 parts per million (ppm)
aflatoxin as a daily
dose, but they had to feed the low - casein group only 2.5 ppm instead:
Relative Contribution of Dietary Protein Level and
Aflatoxin B1
Dose in Generation of Presumptive Preneoplastic Foci in Rat Liver.
The results suggested that low
doses of
aflatoxin were both more toxic and more carcinogenic to monkeys fed low - protein diets.
Yet he and his graduate student George Dunaif asked the question, «at what
dose of
aflatoxin does protein begin to promote cancer?»
Effect of Low Protein Diet on Low
Dose Chronic
Aflatoxin B1 Induced Hepatic Injury in Rhesus Monkeys.
High
doses of
aflatoxin, by contrast, would cause cancer in the monkeys gorging out on protein and just kill the others.
The model of
aflatoxin -
dosing used in these studies, discussed in more detail below, was much more realistic than the model used in most of Campbell's studies, and thus the balance of the evidence suggests that adequate protein likely offers very powerful protection against cancer in someone who hasn't already developed the disease.
In these studies, a chronic low
dose of
aflatoxin produced precancerous lesions in monkeys fed 5 % casein but not in those fed 20 % casein; a chronic medium
dose saved the low - protein monkeys from precancerous lesions by — yup, you guessed it — killing them, while the high - protein monkeys suffered neither plight; and a chronic high
dose was finally able to give the high - protein monkeys pre-cancerous lesions.
Effect of High and Low Dietary Protein on the
Dosing and Postdosing Periods of
Aflatoxin B1 - induced Hepatic Preneoplastic Lesion Development in the Rat.
Large enough
doses of
aflatoxin are a liver carcinogen in high
doses (it's actually what T. Colin Campbell used to induce liver cancer in mice during his China Study crusade to indict animal protein).
Indeed, the researchers weren't pulling our legs: This study really did show that a low - protein diet was both more «cancer promoting» and more deadly than a high - protein diet when the
dose of
aflatoxin was lower.
The results of this earlier experiment were published in a paper called «Effect of Low Protein Diet on Low
Dose Chronic
Aflatoxin B1 Induced Hepatic Injury in Rhesus Monkeys» in 1989.
In the late 1980s, more researchers from India were conducting experiments with casein and cancer — but this time used different
doses of
aflatoxin, and studied rhesus monkeys instead of rats.
Chris Masterjohn has noted that in rats given a low
dose of
aflatoxin daily, after six months all rats on a 20 percent protein diet were still alive, but half the rats on a 5 percent protein diet had died.
Luckily, commercial cattle ranchers aren't
dosing their cattle with 52 mg
aflatoxin per day, and
aflatoxin doesn't occur naturally in pasture.
Researchers
dosed a 160 kg calf with 52 mg
aflatoxin per day for five days, then slaughtered the animal and analyzed its tissues for
aflatoxin levels.
When rats were all fed 20 % casein, the
dose that provided the maximal cancer - promoting effect, those
dosed with 0.4 milligrams per kilogram body weight (0.4 mg / kg) or 1.0 mg / kg of
aflatoxin failed to develop any pre-cancerous lesions at all.
Fisher 344 rats fed 5 % casein developed the following symptoms when
dosed with
aflatoxin (11):
1983 May; 43 (5): 2150 - 4 Effect of high and low dietary protein on the
dosing and postdosing periods of
aflatoxin B1 - induced hepatic preneoplastic lesion development in the rat)
The rats were given humongous liver - destroying
doses of the liver toxin to show that it was not the
aflatoxin that caused the cancer; no, only the rats who got both the
aflatoxin and the animal protein got the cancer.
Dr. Campbell and one of his undergraduate students co-authored a paper in 1989 in which all the rats were
dosed with
aflatoxin early on and were all fed 20 % casein diets while
aflatoxin was still in their systems (7).
Aflatoxin proved lethal to Fisher 344 rats fed low - protein diets when rats fed high - protein diets were immune to the same
doses (4).
If your friend offered you peanut butter sandwiches with 100 grams worth of peanut butter contaminated with the maximum amount of
aflatoxin allowed by the FDA, you'd only have to eat 270,000 peanut butter sandwiches for four days to obtain the
dose of
aflatoxin that produced a «barely detectable response» in Campbell's study.
With more realistic
doses of
aflatoxin, protein is actually tremendously protective against cancer, while protein - restricted diets prove harmful.
«Effect of low protein diet on low
dose chronic
aflatoxin B1 induced hepatic injury in rhesus monkeys.»
More clues for understanding the casein - cancer research come from another Indian study — this one published in the late 1980s, and examining the effects of protein in
aflatoxin - exposed monkeys instead of rats.14 As with Campbell's experiments, the monkeys were fed diets containing either 5 percent or 20 percent casein, but with one important difference: instead of being slammed with an astronomically (and unrealistically) high
dose of
aflatoxin, the monkeys were exposed to lower, daily
doses — mimicking a real - world situation where
aflatoxin is consumed frequently in small amounts from contaminated foods.
For instance, it would be unethical to
dose a group of volunteers with high - cholesterol foods to see if they had more heart attacks, or to feed them high
doses of the fungal poison
aflatoxin to determine whether they suffered more cases of liver cancer.
Chronic, low -
dose exposures to
aflatoxin can suppress the immune system and cause cancer.