He believes that
after the death of the body there is a release from the time - and - space predicament and a conscious sharing in the timeless Life of God, in which there are probably various stages of enlightenment and knowledge.
There are just as many people that believe their is existance
after the death of your body.
There are three important Whiteheadian texts which deal with the question of the immortality of the soul
after the death of the body.
Resurrection after death is the raising or reconstitution of total humanity; it does not presuppose some element in human existence which naturally persists
after the death of the body.
Living here and now in the Kingdom, living and following Jesus where he is leading us now, rather than focusing on what may happen
after the death of this body, however, does make sense.
Many of his subjects reported quasi-religious sensations of bliss, ineffability, timelessness, and reconciliation of opposites; a certainty that consciousness continues
after death of the body; and contact with «a supremely powerful, wise, and loving presence.»
Not exact matches
The horrific denouement
of an ideology that required breaching the boundary
of shame was the shamelessness
of death camps where human beings were robbed
of dignity, stripped
of privacy, deprived, therefore,
of an elemental freedom
of the
body in life and
of the respect we accord the
bodies of the dead
after life is no more.
It has been common in recent years for scripture scholars to tell us that the idea
of the separation
of body and soul
after death — indeed that any systematic distinction between
body and soul — was alien to the Hebrew vision
of the Old Testament.
The Hebrews, prior to the days when the Neo-Platonic philosophy affected Alexandrian Judaism, never thought
of life
after death except in terms
of a resurrected
body.
He never thought,
after the Greek fashion,
of soul as pure being, capable
of disembodiment, but spoke, as his Jewish contemporaries did,
of future life in terms
of bodily resurrection, and on that basis he discussed life
after death with the skeptical Sadducees, protesting only against the popular, contemporary ways
of conceiving the raised
body and its uses in the next world.
Yet, if his
body was raised physically from the grave and did not see corruption, or if his
body was transformed
after death into something different, in such a way that in itself it was annihilated, then he did not experience the whole
of our human destiny.
However, there is a great difference between legitimate doubt as to the precise moment
of death and the position
of a priest asked to anoint a
body in a funeral parlour many hours or days
after death.
The church affirmed an increasingly detailed
body of authoritative Christian doctrine in which hope for the world to come had been subtly transferred to a distant future, to be reached only
after death and resurrection.
This is the only actual
body there is, and it shares in the destiny
of the soul
after death.
Before
death, while we are still in mortal flesh, we eat the labors
of our hands, we swallow with an effort the food so gained; but
after death, we shall begin eagerly to drink in the spiritual life and finally, reunited to our
bodies, and rejoicing in fullness
of delight, we shall be refreshed with immortality.
However what does your life matter to you
after you are dead if your soul (assuming the soul is mortal and simply vanishes with a
death of physical
body) is no longer in existence.
Odin, the chief god
of the Norse, was associated with
death by hanging, and a possible practice
of Odinic sacrifice by strangling has some archeological support in the existence
of bodies perfectly preserved by the acid
of the Jutland (later taken over by the Daner people) peatbogs, into which they were cast
after having been strangled.
[8] Concurrently, a slave named Jack, convicted in a separate arson case, was hanged at a nearby gallows, and
after death his
body was thrown into the fire with that
of Maria.
If refusal to face squarely the fact
of death is found so widely in these days, so also is loss
of belief in a continuation
of human existence, beyond
death, in what used to be called the «
after - life» It is indeed true that among conventionally - minded church - people and many others there is a vague feeling that when the
body dies the «soul» goes on.
And when he was thinking about human existence itself, he was intent upon saying that a whole human person was compounded
of body as well as
of soul; in the end, he said, the two would be reunited
after the separation which
death had brought about.
But before that, it is worth saying that the kind
of mind -
body situation which we have been considering provides a strong case against the notion
of some continuation
after death of the conscious self that had existed before
death.
After a time, however, some Jews began to speak about resurrection
of the
body, which to them meant the entire human personality; they did this because it was inconceivable that Jews who suffered
death as martyrs in the time
of the Maccabees should be «cast as rubbish to the void,» their faithfulness to Judaism unrewarded and their bravery denied enduring value.
So G. W. H. Lampe writes: «if his
body was raised physically from the grave and did not see corruption, or if his
body was transformed
after death into something different, in such a way that in itself it was annihilated, then he did not experience the whole
of our human destiny....
Later in the book, Baruch asked about the exact nature
of the resurrection
body at the consummation, and he was told by God that the dead would rise exactly as they were at the moment
of death, and
after they had been given an opportunity to recognize one another, they would then undergo a spiritual transformation.
The
bodies of men
after death return to dust, and see corruption: but their souls, (which neither die nor sleep) having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God who gave them.
Shortly
after we learned
of the
death of Osama bin Laden, U.S. officials said his
body would be treated in accordance with Islamic traditions.
The fact that personal identity in this life depends so little upon the relation to a common
body and so much upon unmediated hybrid prehensions
of past occasions
of the soul's life strengthens the plausibility
of the claim that continuity may occur
after bodily
death.
As we have seen, Wright advocates a view in which Christian teaching focuses not on life
after death but «life
after life
after death,» which includes the resurrection
of the
body and the redemption
of the created order.
That there is a soul or living person, ontologically distinct from the
body, is the first condition
of the possibility
of life
after death.
Concerning the survival
of the human personality
after death, whether in the Platonic sense
of the immortality
of the soul or the biblical sense
of the resurrection
of the
body, Hartshorne is at times agnostic and at others quite skeptical.
Many Atheists assume there is no life
after death, that with the
death of the
body all self - awareness and existence ends.
(Especially The Resurrection
of the Dead [1926]-RRB- Karl Barth considers it to be the New Testament interpretation that the transformation
of the
body occurs for everyone immediately
after his individual
death — as if the dead were no longer in time.
I know many Christians, and none would complain or care if you threw the
body of a Christian demagogue and murderer into a sewer and urinated on him for years
after death - or while he was alive.
Neither the saying on the Cross, «Today you will be with me in paradise» (Luke 23:43), the parable
of the rich man, where Lazarus is carried directly to Abraham's bosom (Luke 16:22), nor Paul's saying, «I desire to die and to be with Christ» (Philippians 1:23), proves as is often maintained that the resurrection
of the
body takes place immediately
after the individual
death.
The act
of acceptance — making the sign
of the cross or blinking one's eyelids — was surely not the same as repentance, and administering the sacrament
after death,
of course, asked for no act
of will at all, and was scarcely defendable even if one made the curious concession to time that the
body must not be cold.
Since, therefore, man was unimaginable to the Hebrews without a
body, life
after death was naturally pictured as the resuscitation
of the embodied life and its restoration to the land
of the living.
Human beings
after death were, to the early Hebrews, still
bodies, attenuated leftovers and shadowy replicas
of the flesh, and these existences beyond the grave the Old Testament called rephaim — that is, shadows or ghosts.
Whitehead's system does not provide the conditions for speaking
of continued, ongoing personal existence
after death in separation from one's
body.
This convinced belief in a resurrected
body — howbeit full
of confusion as to what «
body» meant — was the Jewish - Christian way
of phrasing life
after death.
Paul did not believe in the resurrection
of the flesh; he specifically denied that «flesh and blood» continued
after death; (I Corinthians 15:50) and the spiritual «
body» with which he wished to be clothed moved in new dimensions altogether, quite different from the Jews» resuscitated «flesh and bones.»
I think I am a soul trapped inside this outer physical
body and I hope that me, as a soul, will continue to be a unit
of awareness long
after the
death of this physical
body.
weak minded morons who are too afraid to face the prospect
of their so lovingly maintained
body turning to dust
after their
death create the concept
of god and soul to hide their fear.
Even in the Easter affirmation
of the Resurrection
of Jesus, so important for Christianity, we can now point to no firm historical evidence to show that there occurred there a miracle which involved suspension or reversal
of natural laws — in this case, the normal processes
of decay into which the physical
body enters
after the point
of death.
The Corinthians did not deny a life
after death, but they conceived
of salvation as the liberation
of an immortal soul from the
body; they were the «demythologizers»
of their day.
In the great orthodox philosophic tradition, the
body is treated as an essential condition to the soul's life in this world
of sense; but
after death, it is said, the soul is set free, and becomes a purely intellectual and non-appetitive being.
At the time
of Jesus»
death there was an earthquake (as not in the other gospels) and «many
bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised, and coming forth out
of the tombs
after his resurrection they entered into the holy city [note the Jewish expression] and appeared to many (27:52 - 3).
Is His Blood a form
of a Will not written on paper that testifies to His
Body's
Death that after the death of the testator His wealth is distributed to His beneficia
Death that
after the
death of the testator His wealth is distributed to His beneficia
death of the testator His wealth is distributed to His beneficiaries.
Also, for those who don't know, most Christians believed God was separate from Christ in
body until the Council
of Nicea several hundred years
after Christ's
death.
You know that I am descended from the most Christian emperors
of the German nation, from the Catholic kings
of Spain, the Archdukes
of Austria and the dukes
of Burgundy...
After death they left us by natural right and heritage these holy Catholic observances, to live according to them and to die according to their example... I am determined to support everything that these predecessors and I myself have kept... It is certain that a single friar errs in his opinion which is against all
of Christendom and according to which all
of Christianity will be and will always have been in error both in the past thousand years and even more in the present... I am absolutely determined to stake on this cause my kingdoms and seignories, my friends, my
body and blood, my life and soul.
After the
death and resurrection
of Christ there is no longer need for the «Tent» or sanctuary because Christ's risen
body has taken its place.