Sentences with phrase «after dismissal damaged»

In Brandt Tractor, McKee, Turner, Fredrickson and Vitran the respective appellate courts held that the employers» actions immediately before and after dismissal damaged the employment relationships to such an extent that the dismissed employees were not required to accept re-employment to mitigate their damages.

Not exact matches

The day after his disciplinary dismissal from University of Tokyo for «damaging the university's honor or credibility,» Hisashi Moriguchi maintained in an interview with ScienceInsider that he really did participate in a groundbreaking experiment to treat a heart disease patient with cardiac muscle cells derived from the patient's own induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells.

After careful analysis of the claim, Justice Perell decided not to exclude group 1 because although they could not pursue damages for wrongful dismissal, they were free to advance claims for the other aspect of the class action suit.

Considering the first sister, the trial judge found that the employee had failed to take reasonable steps to mitigate her damages when she entered university after her dismissal to pursue a general arts degree.

Starting an active job search immediately after dismissal will undercut any employer allegation that the dismissed employee has failed to mitigate his or her damages.

However, Justice Truscott refused to award damages for wrongful dismissal finding that she had not made any efforts to find alternative work after her dismissal because her husband's salary was sufficient to provide for the family.

She was also instrumental in obtaining dismissal, after an evidentiary hearing, of a plaintiff's $ 40 million claim against a hospital client for damages under the federal Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act.

After reorganizing a business, employers must take care that the terms of settlement and new employment they offer to their employees do not provide a basis for a dismissed employee to reasonably refuse to take the position in order to mitigate damages for wrongful dismissal.

Because employees have a duty to mitigate their losses after dismissal, turning down such an offer could potentially be damaging to a case.

A British Columbia production supervisor has successfully sued his former employer for wrongful dismissal after he was laid off indefinitely, but the BC Supreme Court reduced the worker's damages by half because the worker refused the employer's offer of recall.

After his relationship with [the employer] ended, it suited him to say that he was an employee... entitled to damages for unjust dismissal...

Damages for wrongful dismissal are not payable in priority to other expenses pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986, Sch B1, para 99 (4) to (6), since a payment in respect of the period after the date of termination of employment can not amount to «wages» but rather is a payment by the employer on account of the employee's claim for damages for breach of coDamages for wrongful dismissal are not payable in priority to other expenses pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986, Sch B1, para 99 (4) to (6), since a payment in respect of the period after the date of termination of employment can not amount to «wages» but rather is a payment by the employer on account of the employee's claim for damages for breach of codamages for breach of contract.