Sentences with phrase «after events»

Live seminars continued, with a focused effort to encourage men to continue meeting in small groups after the events.

Saturday will be the first time that the Indoor Grand Prix has been staged in Glasgow after events in Birmingham and the meeting acts as the final leg of the new IAAF World Indoor Tour series, which has so far had stops in Karlsruhe, Boston and Stockholm.

After the events of the past week you would have thought Liverpool would let the waters calm between themselves and Southampton following the Virgil Van Dijk tapping up fiasco which followed with a grovelling apology from the Merseysiders.

Five in midfield is even more the rage now after events in Bloemfontein and elsewhere.

Ideal deal for Arrieta after the events of the last few weeks?

The Tampa Bay coach wanted to have a private conversation with the quarterback after the events of Monday night.

After the events of the day are complete, spectators move out to local restaurants or take drives to other parts of our enchanting state.

And while some discrepancies should perhaps be expected in descriptions of very unusual events that were written down in the form we have them some fifty years after these events, this can hardly serve as an argument for their accuracy.

None of the stories were ever PROVEN (BAR NONE) and always written well after the events.

In 14:34, Jesus and his disciples have landed at Gennesaret after the events of Jesus walking on water and stilling the storm.

If we did the same thing with Christianity we would think that they are barbarians after events like the holocaust, WWI, WWII, genocide of the native Americans and colonialism.

Apparently, after the events of Esther 8:1 - 2, Mordecai and Esther waited for a period of about two months to see if the King would figure out some way to reverse an irreversible law.

and bear in mind that MOST of the prophesies were added into the bible decades or centuries after the events had happened just to make it look like a prophesy was fulfilled.

Weren't the Gospels written some 60 years after the events?

And from this Man - created book (compiled nearly 3 Centuries after the events depicted) came this little thing called «Christianity».

Uh — John was written long after the events it describes.

After the events of the past few weeks, there is no one in Baton Rouge who doubts the power of the local community to provide for its suffering members.

We'll go on despite the fact that the bible content was voted on, changed, and written loooong after the events in question occured.

Whereas Wellhausen had challenged the historical reliability of the biblical account on the grounds that it was compiled from multiple sources that originated long after the events reported, his intellectual successors a century later were employing methodologies (such as rhetorical criticism and narrative criticism) that seemed to assume that the biblical writers were not particularly concerned with historical accuracy anyhow.

These Gospels were penned decades after the events actually happened.

They often use really old articles to troll for responses, sometimes using an article several times over the course of a year or two... long after the events have died away or changed.

History tells us that the Gospels were written decades after the events.

I think being written only a few decades after these events is about as good a deal as you can get w / ancient history; same goes for finding early 2nd century samples of m in Egypt.

After these events are over: other than a memory, what is left that is of any real temporal value?

Mike, historically, being written decades after the events is an incredibly short time.

None of the Bible stories were ever PROVEN (BAR NONE) and they were will written long after the events supposedly happened.

It's easy to write a book that has predicted the future when it's written after the events have already taken place.

Author Chuck Palahniuk plans to revisit Tyler Durden and the whole gang in an upcoming graphic novel that takes place 10 years after the events of Fight Club, his novel which David Fincher later adapted into the now - classic film.

The historical problem can be stated in some such way as this: «We know that the Gospels were written more than a generation after the events they relate occurred and that they bring us the preaching and teaching of the churches — or of some of them — after the Christian movement had emerged into a Gentile environment.

Arguments based on your version of a book compiled from dozens of sources hundreds of years after the events they claim to relate and for many parts of which contradictory evidence is a «plenty (No historical evidence whatsoever of an Exodus, for example plus we now know the Egyptians did not use a slave - based economy for construction as one example.

In A.D. 70, roughly 40 years after the events in Luke 3, Israel was cut down and thrown into the fire.

Why would eyewitnesses need to rely on accounts by a person who was not claimed to be an eyewitness and who lived well after the events they supposedly witnessed?

After the events that happen here, all the people kept on saying to one another, «We have seen strange things today!»

We must remember we don't know much about how the Bible came to be written, but most scholars believe that almost nothing was written until years after the events had taken place.

I find that so many people go to extremes after events like holidays and commit themselves to restrictive diets or resolve to follow some type of extreme diet plan.

But by your standards, because it was written 53 years after the events it is no good.

Many people question the authenticity of the authorship of the Gospels and can not understand how they claim to be eye witness accounts of events that were not written until years after the events actually happened.

The Gospels were first written down decades after the events supposedly occurred: can you at least concede the possibility that some events were at least exagerated, if not indeed fabricated?

Other than a book that was written down centuries after the events it speaks about occurred, what proof can you present?

2 Given this author's care and demonstrated reliability, as well as his contact with eyewitnesses within the first generation after the events, this man can be trusted when it comes to matters in the life of Jesus for which we do not enjoy independent confirmation.

And after the events of today, I would not at all be surprised if the police show up at our house to give her a stern lecture.

Is it not possible that the Bible prophecies were actually written after the events they supposedly predict occurred?

legends come LONG after the facts... as in the days of the Bible times... the Gospels do NOT show evidence of LEGENDS being formed as they were written soon after the events..

One man from the village was talking to one of the former leaders shortly after these events, «I feel like I can really talk to you now.»

kermit: «they were written soon after the events..

Mark is generally held to be the earliest Gospel, written some thirty - five to forty years after the events.

Probably they were both written between fifty and sixty years after the events that they record, and I am inclined to think that the order is Luke - Matthew.

After the events of the last few weeks, I finally understand why they resist church oversight.

These all take place before, during, and after these events.

We are not being asked to believe in something written a «long» time after the events.