Sentences with phrase «after much argument»

After much argument, he does.

After much argument, the developing Christian church adopted this date as the birthday of their savior, Jesus.

Not exact matches

The shale revolution weakened a strong and intuitive argument in favour of the Keystone, namely that the pipeline would serve to transport much needed fuel to be used domestically in the U.S. And Prime Minister Stephen Harper's pledge to turn to China after Washington's temporary rejection of the Keystone in early 2012, hasn't amounted to much so far.

Further, again, the Author of this article (after whose viewpoint I structured my argument) also takes the much more strict interpretation as described.

My own conclusion is similar to that of Wilber (1984), which he reaches after a much longer argument than I have given here:

After all, we had all read Daniel Bell's The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism, which makes a much more measured argument than Hart's.

It would largely also agree on much of this top 25 in August, after Signing Day, the NFL Draft, quarterback battles, assistant coaching changes, early enrollees, arrests, injuries, suspensions, and bizarre news events alter every team in some way, along with hours and hours of study of each of these teams introducing new arguments for and against everybody.

I don't get this argument that he will see how much the Ox has developed after leaving — he looks pretty much the same player to me, flashes of brilliance but still gives the ball away cheaply.

of course no team wants to lose but I can guarantee you that the reaction by the Chelski fans after today's results are nowhere near what would have occurred if we shit the bed on opening day... the difference is they have tasted EPL success on more than one occasion recently, they have won the Champions League and they have done it with 3 different managers in the last 12 years with a similar, if not smaller, wage bill than us... in comparison, we have been experiencing our own personal Groundhog Day with nothing to show for it but a few silvery trinkets that would barely wet the appetite of a world - class club... so it's time for Wenger to stop gloating over our week one escape act and make some substantial moves before this window closes or I fear that things will take a horrible turn when the inevitable happens... living on a knife's edge is no way to go through a full season of football and regardless of what side of the argument you fall on, you could feel high levels of toxicity in the air and that was friggin week one... I would much rather someone tried their best and failed, than took half - measures and hoped for the best

I really did expect this argument to be pretty uncontroversial — after all, it is little more than the systemization of what is pretty much established wisdom on the subject.

-- Vote against the finance bill after listening to the people's concerns over issues like the 10p tax rate (assuming the bill remains talking about retrospective taxation)-- Recognise the much bulkier and more vast argument against 42 days legislation and support the rebellion against this legislation rather than supporting the PR men and the policy writers to the hilt regardless of the realities of the situation.

We believe that there are big political arguments to be had between the left and the right of politics, and the left has every reason to be confident about our values and ideas, which have done much to change Britain for the better over the last century and which are in the ascendancy internationally after three decades in which anti-government arguments have often dominated.

After showing how the «skills gap» originates in company policies, Why Good People Can't Get Jobs explains why «the skills gap argument has gotten so much traction, and the actual causes of the supply - demand job mismatch are so poorly understood.»

Yet after all your verbal gymnastics, I have yet to see a «dignity» argument from your side calling on sugar babies to accept broke sugar daddies who can't pay much of an allowance.

The storyline is one farfetched contrivance after another, starting off with the mix up at one of the better hotels in Vegas, whose staff are too incompetent and easily swayed by the weakest of arguments to believe that they could ever find a job, much less retain one.

After all the talk of 2009 being «the year of the woman,» owing much to the number of female directors who found themselves in the mix (and inevitably leading to Kathryn Bigelow's history - making moment at the Kodak), I'm sensing an even better argument for 2010 as a singular season for the fairer sex.

We take heart in knowing that identical arguments were made when large - scale clinical trials were introduced in medicine after World War II — a time when medicine was seen as more an art than a science, much as education is today.

After much back and forth and an argument we were provided with a Junior Suite with king size bed which mystically appeared in their computer system!

The argument over whether games are art has been around for ages, but no matter your stance on the topic, games like Seasons After Fall drip with so much beauty that «art» is one of the first words that comes to mind.

But the argument that a cyclist is less likely to kill someone else is only valid up to a point - after all, unpredictable road users are a danger to everyone - and when I'm driving I would much rather know that the cyclist in front of me is sober and is unlikely to wobble into my path.

In the case of climate change, those measurements after measurements by thousands of scientists for over fifty years are adding up to an extremely compelling and robust argument because they all pretty much agree with each other: we can send people to the moon, and our excess CO2 is changing the climate.

It pretty much backs up your argument that anthropogenic contribution could only have commenced after 1950.

Now Crispin, if you are trying to say that the laws of thermodynamics are, like the Pirate Code, not so much laws as «suggestions» (because one way to avoid the conclusions of an argument that you don't like is to reject its axioms, after all) you might want to soberly reconsider that statement.

-- after several decades and expenditures in the bazillions, the IPCC still has not provided a convincing argument for how much warming in the 20th century has been caused by humans.

After a few early wins, the tide has very much turned against the constitutional - challenge argument.

The argument was that these institutions had grown so huge that (due largely to deregulation that they had helped implement) if they were to suddenly collapse, the effect on the economy would be devastating (yeah, because the economy we have now, after the bailouts, is so much better).

Charles's argument is essentially that they'll learn much more about what they're building if they go after a community that is unrelated to Bitcoin.

After you get past the front - facing camera and Office, you can't make too much of an argument for the Surface 2.

What you do after an argument is much more important than what you actually argued about.

So in a sense, even if you do calm down after being upset, you've still lost, because those biochemicals are going to hang out in your brain, making arguments or emotional withdrawal much easier.