And
aftermath of argument leads to anxiety and depression.
Not exact matches
Jed Shugerman, a Fordham law professor, told Business Insider in an email that Republicans» claims in the
aftermath of the Comey hearing were «not good - faith
arguments» based on the testimony.
According to Prof. Smolin, the
argument of Natural Rights is that, through Casey and its
aftermath, the pro-life movement has effectively been defeated, and that, therefore, the United States must inevitably decline and collapse.
In the
aftermath of the horrifying shooting at Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School in Parkland, Florida, the predictable
arguments are raging in newsrooms, state houses and living rooms.
(And based on Jay Jacobs» babbling in the
aftermath of the Iron Bowl, Missouri will make the
argument in less
of an enraged - Golden - Corral - patron manner.)
As a result, in the
aftermath of WWII,
arguments rooted in biology were decisively rejected and «anti-naturalistic thought» prevailed.
Originality: Science is the discovery
of the unknown... Skepticism: Scientists take nothing on trust...» Merton's original work was done in the
aftermath of World War II and is understood as making the
argument for the necessity
of these norms to scientific advancement in a democratic society.
This could be an
argument to weigh by the Dutch Supreme Court in the
aftermath of preliminary answers
of the CJEU in this TBG Limited - case.
Today's Supreme Court decision in Kimbrough v. U.S. (see earlier post) doesn't directly address the retroactivity issue (at least, I didn't see it), but Professor Berman suggests that defendants who preserved the disparity
argument may have grounds for seeking modified sentences in the
aftermath of Kimbrough (while those who didn't preserve the
argument are out
of luck).
In the
aftermath of the U.S. Supreme Court same - sex marriage
arguments, a post by law professor Dale Carpenter on The Volokh Conspiracy blog has been making the rounds on Twitter and in the legal blogosphere.
An in - depth analysis
of the
aftermath of the Kadi saga will be more properly tackled in book - length and from a variety
of perspectives (see the forthcoming Routledge volume edited by Matej Avbelj, Filippo Fontanelli and Giuseppe Martinico, Kadi on Trial: A multifaceted analysis
of the Kadi judgment, which will also feature an elaboration
of my
argument sketched out in this post).
But is Ribstein's
argument that «anyone can give advice on Delaware corporate law» still accurate in the
aftermath of the Sample decision?
Law bloggers rarely concur on any topic, but in the
aftermath of today's oral
argument before the Supreme Court in Stoneridge v. Scientific Atlanta, most are predicting a victory for business advisers and a loss for the plaintiffs bar.
Thus, there is an
argument to be made that statements made in the immediate
aftermath of an accident are the most reliable.
Yet in the
aftermath of the recent deep recession, we see continuing
arguments and discussion about... Read more»
The
argument goes something like this: Not only would ending the MID create a deep source
of money for reducing the U.S. budget deficit, but in the
aftermath of the mortgage crisis, the country needs to rethink its favored tax treatment
of homeownership.