Sentences with phrase «again as the question»

Now, its name is popping again as the question of the Times / U-T availability has been raised.

You and your team will turn to this invaluable reference tool again and again as questions and complications arise along your PLC journey.

Not exact matches

Again, use your answer to this question as an article topic.

NATO has once again come under fire, as Donald Trump has called into question the basic assumption underlying the military alliance.

But the question is, as more than half of all states now have state laws allowing for medical marijuana and / or adult - use marijuana markets, and the industry has created approximately 150,000 jobs and brought in almost $ 7 billion in revenue in 2016, can the industry be pushed into the black market again?

In response to these questions, as well as the discrepancies raised in the Bloomberg article, Rubicon again painted itself as an underdog taking on the trash industry's giants.

Now the question is whether Hollywood, as obsessed as it is with these issues, has implemented sufficient protections to prevent these types of hacks from happening again.

As another school year begins, artistic - minded students (and their parents) are once again wrestling with the age - old question of whether one should indulge an enthusiasm for music, literature or other fine - arts subjects at school, or instead study something more... shall we say... employable?

That's a question that children of all ages will be asking themselves and each other this month as school gets underway again.

On a range of questions — such as whether Harper is doing a good job, is representing the «values» of people, and should run again in the 2015 election, the prime minister has support levels among Canadians that exceed 40 per cent.

Following Warren Buffet comments, analysts have again started raising questions over the digital currencies potential to work as the medium of exchange.

As rates have risen, investors have, once again, started asking the perennial question: Is the bond bull market over and are rates normalizing?

You should not try to answer these questions for all conceivable customers as, once again, you do not want to reach every potential customer.

If Apple is forced to break its own security to get into one phone in this specific case, a precedent is set, and then the question is where and when can that precedent be used again and again, which begs the question as to whether we will ever have privacy again in our ever increasing digital world?

But again, God is just, so questions as to «What about the baby that is born to a society that has never heard of Jesus?»

evolution has nothing to say about the «big bang» it would be just as strange to say that «god» or some intelligence made the world and the universe, as you have to come to the obvious questions again..

And RichUnix, you asked me the same question on my post, and once again I answer you with «Compassion towards all» that is the true Gods name, as we are all a spark God within.

As Mitt Romney eyes a 2012 presidential bid, he is facing the so - called Mormon question again, just as he did during his unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Republican nominatioAs Mitt Romney eyes a 2012 presidential bid, he is facing the so - called Mormon question again, just as he did during his unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Republican nominatioas he did during his unsuccessful bid for the 2008 Republican nomination.

As regards the Jewish people, it must again and again be made clear that the question is in no sense political, but is purely religious.

We offer them not only for their intrinsic worth but because women's concerns, as they are called, will undoubtedly come before the bishops again, and because the problems posed by «One in Christ Jesus» illustrate difficulties that all the churches have when it comes to making statements on questions of societal moment.

But humility, mercy, poking at the question of whether a blog forum can really serve as a place for such intimate pain and extraordinary accusations of abuse... especially when, again, parties are apparently asking for direct, private conversation... just doesn't seem all that outrageous to offer as thoughts to the conversation.

So once again, we confront our central question: Is the point of the household codes to declare pater familias the only godly household structure for all of time, or is the point of the household codes to declare Jesus Christ as the example to be followed no matter societal norms?

On the third question posed by the Chiang Mai meeting, regarding the Holy Spirit and religious plurality, the statement declares: «We have learned again to see the activity of the Spirit as beyond our definitions, descriptions, and limitations, as «the wind blows where it wills» (John 3:8) We have marveled at the «economy» of the Spirit in all the world, and are full of hope and expectancy.

Thereby a theological chasm is once again arising between the Christian and the Jew that is perhaps as great or even greater than it has been in the past, a chasm leading the Christian to question his knowledge of Yahweh, and to recognize that the Scripture which he knows as Old Testament is not the Scripture which is known to the Jew.

In fact, if a student submitted that question as a survey question for my Stats class, I would tell them why it was broken and ask them to try again.

And, as Pope Benedict again has said, this fundamental question, which isa question we have to answer with our intelligence sustained by the light of faith, is that if we discern reason in the world, in nature - if nature is understandable - the question arises; where does this come from?

«clown question bro» is the same poster as «bubbles», so don't feel you have to refute this idiocy again.

We do not question the appropriateness of the term as applied to him, but, on the example of Samuel and Nathan, we suspect that if he was called a prophet by his contemporaries it was, again, because of regularized status as a professional, in this case presumably membership in an association of prophets at or near Shiloh.

Future generations will again pose the question of truth as an element of society, hence the old question of the ecclesiality of Christian truth is still a new question.

Again, this represents a collaborative effort, as the interview questions are always yours!

Or again, just as the very existence of the plant implies its rootedness in the ground such that its very posing of the question, «Is there a ground?»

Again the question for the minister is: What am I doing, as a part of my preaching responsibility, to work through these barriers?

Again, sorry for the long post, but I do believe that there are many aspects that I touch on, that many people haven't considered, in their questioning of some forms of sexual expression as being a «sin».

@Mirosal: As always we're stuck asking the same question we always ask and once again, they run scared b / c they can't answer it without use of of some buybull - sh!

But again, as there, questions inevitably arise out of the intellectual disposition of our own environment of the twentieth - century West.

The question that Wyschogrod presses time and again is whether on this particular point the proper Jewish understanding is not the proper Christian understanding as well.

Therefore I wish to raise again the question in this final section as to whether Altizer, despite his rejection of Buddhism as definitely different from and lesser than Christianity, has not in the final analysis come full circle and embraced a Buddhist type of radical immanentalism.

Unfortunately, as a former Christian, well acquainted with sin and confession and the whole bloody business of sacrifice to appease Someone who thinks that shows «love,» I question the whole ancient story, all the animals killed, all the trees cut down (for temples and churches and crosses and «holy books») and all the human beings left to feel separated again and again from the universe, Nature, each other and their «gods.»

As Thanksgiving approaches, many of you will be Homeward Bound and back again, on turnpikes or through airports, and you are starting to ask that key question: what recorded books ought I to obtain for the journey?

Even though Lewis stated that his stories were conceived as «holiday fiction» for the amusement of children (perhaps primarily for the amusement of the child in him), again we return to the question «Was there more to his stories than that?»

Again the question is designed to compromise Jesus; a clear «yes» would have a bad popular effect, and a «no» would portray him as seditious.

As threat, retirement forces me to examine again such basic questions as, «Who am I?&raquAs threat, retirement forces me to examine again such basic questions as, «Who am I?&raquas, «Who am I?»

His strategy, which he refers to as a «recurrence» to this phase of philosophic thought, is to back up to the point where he is sitting there cheek to jowl with Descartes, and then to start all over again, this time avoiding the hopeless dualism which has kept Descartes, and the whole tradition which constitutes the phase of thought in question, from completing the Copernican Revolution.

I have also found myself looking into the faces of that diversified company of informal students embracing, for example, my colleagues teaching in other fields, as well as those other friends from all walks with whom I spend sustaining nonworking hours and who, ever and again even in the midst of play, put me back to work with «simple» innocent questions about the Bible.

And here again we may recall, that early as the source may be, the passage in question was not written down until much water had flowed under the bridge.

A more effective presentation considers methodological questions integrally with the more technical material, as is done in G. Holton's excellent volume.5 Again, occasional use of the «case method «6 allows the process of discovery to be seen in its total historical context, including social and intellectual forces.

Now if interpretation is, as Gadamer says, the attempt to hear again the question which occasioned the answer provided by the text, then forgetfulness of the perennial questions of existence is a major block to interpretation.

And, again despite your claim, there is zero question that most of the people who died under the regimes of Lenin, Stalin and Pol Pot (though somewhat less under Mao) died as the result of SPECIFICALLY anti-theist policies.

Again, you sidestep the question about repentance and forgiveness, which is key, as Jesus has sent us out to forgive and retain sins.

O.K. Frogist... I'm going to try and make this as simple as possible, and again, you can fire me back some questions / comments as needed.