The accounts will eventually balance
again at some lower temperature.
Not exact matches
I burned the nuts the first time and had to prepare them
again: when I make this
again, I will be careful to drain off as much syrup as possible before spreading the nuts on the baking sheet, and will probably bake them a little longer
at a
lower temperature.
This is the perfect
temperature for cooking — you're right 200 F is far too
low, let us know if you bake these
again at the correct
temperature.
After the September
low, ice began to build up
again in the Arctic; rapidly
at first, compared to other years, then slowing during October and November as the region experienced a spell of exceptionally high
temperatures.
The team used
temperature - controlled photoelectron spectroscopy in EMSL, the DOE's Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory on the PNNL campus, to determine how tightly one cyanide ion and one to three water molecules interact
at the very
low temperature of -438 °F (12 Kelvin) and
again at ambient
temperature of 80 °F (equivalent to 300 Kelvin).
Again, start
at very
low temperature, for about 10 minutes.
If you plan to try
again pour the batter on the warm nonstick waffle iron which is generously greased, cook these waffles
at a very
low temperature setting and then just before taking them out increase the setting to medium - high
temperature for few minutes.
After soaking, you can dehydrate them
at low temperature of around 105 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit until they are crispy
again, as they are far more palatable when they are crunchy.
And Stefan, something tells me I should not engange stefan
again, but you know that evaporation occurs
at a constant
temperature, it removes heat but can proceed without
lowering the
temperature.
New University of Colorado
at Boulder calculations indicate the record
low minimum extent of sea ice across the Arctic last September has a three - in - five chance of being shattered
again in 2008 because of continued warming
temperatures and a preponderance of younger, thinner ice.
(
At even
lower temperatures, CO2 would condense to dry ice, as on Mars, and we would once
again face the need to compute the balance between atmospheric and surface quantities of an IR - absorbing substance)
And when global
temperatures are getting as
low as they have been in nearly three decades, predicting «a cold spell» is no work of genius, and neither is the «prediction'that it will get warm
again...
at some point.
''... worked with two sediment cores they extracted from the seabed of the eastern Norwegian Sea, developing a 1000 - year proxy
temperature record «based on measurements of δ18O in Neogloboquadrina pachyderma, a planktonic foraminifer that calcifies
at relatively shallow depths within the Atlantic waters of the eastern Norwegian Sea during late summer,» which they compared with the temporal histories of various proxies of concomitant solar activity... This work revealed, as the seven scientists describe it, that «the
lowest isotope values (highest
temperatures) of the last millennium are seen ~ 1100 - 1300 A.D., during the Medieval Climate Anomaly, and
again after ~ 1950 A.D.» In between these two warm intervals, of course, were the colder
temperatures of the Little Ice Age, when oscillatory thermal minima occurred
at the times of the Dalton, Maunder, Sporer and Wolf solar minima, such that the δ18O proxy record of near - surface water
temperature was found to be «robustly and near - synchronously correlated with various proxies of solar variability spanning the last millennium,» with decade - to century - scale
temperature variability of 1 to 2 °C magnitude.»
Then that
lowest atmosphere layer emit and a 50 - 50 split sends it half up and half down; and the up ward is
again absorbed by a higher and now cooler layer; which in turn emits but now
at a
lower temperature; until finally some much higher and much cooler layer gets to emit radiation that actually escapes to space and that radiating
temperature is the one that must balance with the incoming TSI insolation rate.
In fact, the
lower - tropospheric
temperatures warm
at a slightly greater rate over North America (about 0.28 °C / decade using satellite data) than do the surface
temperatures (0.27 °C / decade), although
again the difference is not statistically significant.