I hope that one or other or both of them will look
again at the arguments I made then.
«There is now also a strong case for looking
again at the arguments for delaying the university application process until after exam results.
Not exact matches
Waugh fans have long indulged friendly
arguments about the master's greatest work; a recent re-reading of The Sword of Honour Trilogy (Everyman's Library) persuaded me (
again) that these three books easily stand with A Handful of Dust and Brideshead Revisited
at the summit of Waugh's achievement, even as they brilliantly lay bare the European cultural crisis that was vastly accelerated by World War I.
Holiness for me was found in the mess and labour of giving birth, in birthday parties and community pools, in the battling sweetness of breastfeeding, in the repetition of cleaning, in the step of faith it took to go back to church
again, in the hours of chatting that have to precede the real heart - to - heart talks, in the yelling
at my kids sometimes, in the crying in restaurants with broken hearted friends, in the uncomfortable silences
at our bible study when we're all weighing whether or not to say what we really think, in the
arguments inherent to staying in love with each other, in the unwelcome number on the scale, in the sounding out of vowels during bedtime book reading, in the dust and stink and heat of a tent city in Port au Prince, in the beauty of a soccer game in the Haitian dust, in the listening to someone else's story, in the telling of my own brokenness, in the repentance, in the secret telling and the secret keeping, in the suffering and the mourning, in the late nights tending sick babies, in confronting fears, in the all of a life.
consider: 1) this is an
argument the authors had NO WAY of foreseeing... and yet there story is yet
again corroborated (
at the very least in terms of context).
He's developing an
argument about the significance of the doctrine of the resurrection by discussing the logical consequence of denying it (verses 12 - 19), going on a very typical Pauline digression almost as if he's overcome by joy
at the positive truth and has to triumphantly proclaim it (verses 20 - 28) then finally returning to drive home the practical point
again (verses 29 - 35).
You need to stop being so vindictive towards others, maybe read a book, go have sex, whatever you need to calm down, then come back and realize that no one is attacking you, im sure people are laughing
at this conversation, but not because of what it in but just because its pointless, you bring up the same things OVER and OVER
again and then accuse me of having spuratic
arguments?
This same work of Cicero's is cited by Augustine in book two of the City of God for its definition of a commonwealth, and
again at a key point in the
argument in book nineteen.
Still,
again, my
argument that it will not do to attribute supreme freedom to God and no freedom
at all to anything else is a conceptual
argument.
Then
again I guess you could make the
argument that every rock on Earth is technically space rock
at one point or another when we first formed so I guess I continually get my wish every second I take a step, but lets just say for
arguments sake that rocks that didn't form on earth are pretty neat.
And
at this point Ive heard these
arguments thousands of times, and I can reason around them all day long, but unless the Atheist Messiah comes
again you won't have any answers or rebuttals for me.
How
again does your point engender itself to the attempt
at a faith based
argument which is the whole point of this post?
Kieran Gibbs, Aaron Ramsey and Gabriel Paulista are all intermittent with their performances and its telling that of these three ONLY Ramsey has had interest from other more feted clubs Your
argument fell apart ages ago but let's look
at the fact that you called Mesut Ozil, Alexis Sanchez (both of whome may yet leave us) Laurent Koscielny, and Santi Cazorla brilliant players is
again bang on the money BUT Olivier Giroud, and Theo Walcott?????????? Please god save me from this ignorance, have you been watching the same season as me and the rest of us???????? Will Wenger really spend on a freight load of new players or will there be just one signing??
Dogra reportedly got into a fiery
argument at the NFL Combine with Rob Brzezinski, Minnesota's vice president of football operation, and «made it clear that Peterson would never play there
again.»
Mane has NEVER played as the ST NEVER, and Long has been starting
at / playing RW for the past 3 - 4 months so once
again clearly you don't know so this
argument is pointless
It's not often you will find a referee taking charge of successive home games
at a club but it is almost fifteen weeks since that promotion clincher and I certainly had no
argument with his last act that afternoon, to blow that final whistle to signal that, once
again, we are a Premier League club.
If the working parent handles the bills and the stay -
at - home parent does the shopping (and you're not independently wealthy) expect to have this particular
argument over and over and over
again.
The no campaign has tried to counter these
arguments and mobilise opponents of independence by playing up the risks of an independent Scotland and the break with tradition —
again tactics aimed
at voters high on conscientiousness and low on openness.
«This is a global bank with people working all around the world but it is important that we take a tough look and as for bonuses, I haven't seen the details yet but what we've seen in the last few weeks just strengthens our
argument that we should repeat the bonus tax
again this year and use the billions of pounds to keep the economy moving when it is stagnated
at the moment.»
When everyone agrees, it's time look
at the
argument again.
Brown
again reiterates the «do nothing»
argument, which, incidentally, has no relevance
at all to the question.
Again, a critique of a person's character should not prevent further examination of the
arguments at hand.
Because
again you don't want to just get into replacing one untestable or
at least experimentally untestable
argument seemingly with another one.
I don't ever want to have to look
at another anti-grain
argument again (yeah, right).
Then
again, irrationality is
at the heart of Triumph of Love, so we'll let some other critic make the
arguments for screwing with perceptions and suggest that those of you who favor the arthouse seek this one out.
«There are five - minute sequences where Tatum and Ryan are going back and forth so quickly between an
argument and then making up, then they argue
again and laugh
at the end,» Ronan said.
The best
argument for emphasizing evidence in educational policy and practice is what happens when evidence plays no role: practice and policy swing like a pendulum from one enthusiasm to the opposite, and then back
again, but no progress is made.The solution is to have a wide array of research going on
at all times to create and evaluate promising solutions to longstanding problems.
Again, as Graham mentions above, the hybrid version of the RX carries a hefty price premium over the normal gas model, so the cost savings
at the gas pump
argument may not ring true until years down the road.
Again posted
at Must Use Bigger Elephants, saying, «The quality
argument is moot an unimportant.
The
argument against it is that when money's earned, tax is paid
at the time, so to pay tax on it
again isn't fair.
We know about an investing strategy that beats Buy - and - Hold in 102 out of 110 time - periods, an investing strategy that permits us to obtain far higher returns
at dramatically less risk, an investing strategy that permits us all to retire years sooner and that would bring us out of this economic crisis if we could share it with millions of middle - class investors (if people could switch to an investment strategy that would put their retirement plans back on track, they would feel free to start spending
again and businesses could start hiring
again), and our first reaction is to come up with convoluted
arguments as to why the best thing to do is to AVOID learning more about it and to AVOID getting the word out to the millions of middle - class people whose lives we have destroyed with our promotion of Buy - and - Hold.
ow and lastly going off of ure
argument then I guess we should just get rid of any other animals that kill us like snakes, tigers, spiders, elephants, hippos, crocs, insects, ow and we can't forget to exterminate the animal
at the top of the list, the one that kills more humans than any other animal in the world, what was that animals name
again, ow ya that's right right it, s other HUMANS!
Again, it is an
argument which seems all wrong
at first — how can you criticise an African American artist for failing to take into account what the African - Caribbean population would make of her work?
The Shanghai Biennale «Why Not Ask
Again:
Arguments, Counter-
arguments, and Stories» (12 November 2016 to 12 March 2017)
at Shanghai Power Station of Art is curated by India's Raqs Media Collective.
Again, my congratulations to the difficult science
at work in this
argument.
For Bruce's benefit I will bring up the 2010 Hartwell Paper
again — http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27939/ We need to move beyond the simple
arguments expressed in utterly simple minded idioms of science, beyond the tax or no tax — an unwinnable
argument at best — to creative solutions.
Try
again and come back with a question or an
argument which shows you have
at least some scientific comprehension.
For all the thunder and fury the original hockey stick generated (and I trust Mann and his team have their hard hats
at the ready
again), it's not the hinge - pin
argument for global warming.
############################ I'll have look
at his list
again, the stupid is pretty thick around here so its hard to keep them all straight, especially when they cant even understand what a circular
argument is and is not.
This looks like more of his fair and balanced posing — if someone offers
argument directed
at one side, Danny rushes in to show how it is valid against the other as well, thus confirming once
again he is the non-partisan arbitrator we all secretly wish for.
If you agree, then look
again from that perspective as you look
at the
arguments being presented.
willard, «You're
again trying to make it about Very Tall, Cap’n, so I doubt you look
at his
argument at all.
As
at various points in my life I've been a «born
again Baptist», a strong Atheist, and a simpering Agnostic; I'm comfortable with all sides of the
argument... So I'm more «like the French»... I don't care what you believe as long as you say it properly; --RRB-
The
arguments are being bandied about
again —
at a high intensity.
3) Most of the statistical
arguments are harder yet, as they definitely need domain expertise, and
again, one needs to look
at patterns to distinguish between incompetence and malice.
Shaviv, who calls the website «Wishfulclimate.org,» noted that the «writers (
at RealClimaet.org) try
again and
again to concoct what appears to be deep critiques against skeptic
arguments, but end up doing a very shallow job.
Both are just the same failed progressive
arguments for central planning that have failed,
at great human cost, over and over
again in history.
that the «writers (
at RealClimaet.org) try
again and
again to concoct what appears to be deep critiques against skeptic
arguments, but end up doing a very shallow job.
Well, my recollection is sketchy, and I won't read the blogs (
again), but I'd rank the Blackboard for its exploits
at promoting the lukewarming
argument.
Again, if someone were to break into your [winnipegman's] computers
at home or
at work, publish your private e-mails, and spin them out of all proportion in newspapers all around the world, will you even be making such an «
argument»?