Sentences with phrase «again making judgments»

Not exact matches

If by the power of God's grace we are in a position to accept ourselves as pilgrims, as mortal men seeking their way with difficulty through the darkness, as failing again and again and yet bound in duty to an earthly task; if the Church effects that acceptance by celebrating the death of the Lord, and makes us men of prayer who are really conscious of the future judgment of God, if the Church sends its children strengthened with God's grace out into their own maturity which burdens them but sets them free, then the Church by its official ministry has done what it alone can and must do.

They usually are content to demythologize it.11 Here again, if one makes the opposite judgment as a systematic theologian, based in Scripture and tradition, that belief in the resurrection of Jesus is not only necessary to Christian faith, but one of its most distinctive and important elements, one may find it possible to express that belief in Whitehead's understanding of the person.

I once again would like to emphasize I am not making judgments on the players, rather placing a judgment on ESPN's analysis.

To wrap up, I would once again like to emphasize that I am not making a judgment on whether Lacazette is a better or worse player than Giroud.

I can start visiting my favorite plant nursery again, brighter colors are everywhere, and I can make Italian sodas without judgment... warm weather is the best.

You can start dating over 50 again by having positive attitudes, thinking of meeting someone interesting will also help in preventing you of making snap judgments about your date.

And the core of democratic leadership, we learned once again, is public discourse that makes clear the principles for which we act and the facts that guide our judgment about what we must do together.

Again, in my judgment four of the NETS - S (ISTE, 2007) provided particularly useful criteria for the work sample analysis: Standard 1 - Creativity and Innovation; Standard 2 - Communication and Collaboration; Standard 3 - Research and Information Fluency; and Standard 4 - Critical Thinking, Problem Solving, and Decision - Making.

Again, you are wrong and it is rather mind boggling the foolish empty judgments you feel entitled to make.

But, again, everybody has to make their own judgments on this.

Once again, Blizzard unfurls a set of units in a set of missions that barely relate to the actual game (what does it say about me that I consider the skirmish and multiplayer the «actual game», but I'm not dedicated enough to make any sort of meaningful judgment about how the new units affect balance?).

Like if you throw enough at it, it will spit back a thing you want, and I think what gets lost there is that they aren't learning — and perhaps your mythical second year associate too isn't learning — to make value judgments about what a good source is and what isn't, and maybe if your AI is smart enough to say, «Hey, everybody thinks this law review is more reputable than that law review,» but even that again is sort of... it's area - specific.

And nearly all the big names in Internet service providers, from Google to Yahoo! to Facebook and others, are currently seeking a declaratory judgment from the FISC - R (Zwillinger is again representing Yahoo! in this case) asking the court for the authority to publish the number of surveillance demands — just the number — the government has made.

He adds: «If you have a complicated piece of advice or judgment but you want to do it over again and you want to make it scalable, Neota is a tool that potentially allows us to do that.»

On appeal, the officer's lawyers are again arguing that the provision violates the Charter and is grossly disproportionate for someone who made an «error in judgment in the heat of the moment.»

He recognizes that the courts might be pressed again to defer to military decision - making («I would not lead people to rely on this Court for a review that seems to me wholly delusive») and proposes that the chief constraint against this unconstitutional action is the executive's «responsibility to the political judgments of their contemporaries and to the moral judgments of history.»

[As an aside, let me say once again that there's no excuse for the Superior Court's failure to publish judgments online immediately it makes it available to the news media.

Again professional judgment makes a difference.

When I see Mark Lowery acting like a clown I realize again you can't make snap judgments.