Sentences with phrase «against obamacare»

Some people find that a benefit — one argument against Obamacare is that, say, young single men shouldn't have to pay «extra» for maternity coverage that they're not going to use, and with HSMs you may not have to — but, again, it's important to know what the tradeoff is between health insurance and HSMs.

· A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Health Care Case (co-authored)(Palgrave, 2013)

A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Affordable Care Act (Palgrave MacMillan).

He is the author of Democracy and Political Ignorance: Why Smaller Government is Smarter (Stanford University Press, revised and expanded second edition, 2016), and The Grasping Hand: Kelo v. City of New London and the Limits of Eminent Domain (University of Chicago Press, 2015, rev. paperback ed., 2016), coauthor of A Conspiracy Against Obamacare: The Volokh Conspiracy and the Health Care Case (Palgrave Macmillan, 2013), and co-editor of Eminent Domain: A Comparative Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2017).

There are people with strong opinions both for and against Obamacare.

And what exactly is wrong with being against Obamacare?

That was certainly true in 2010, when a voter backlash against Obamacare triggered a wave of Republican victories, especially at the state level, which in turn set the stage for major progress on education reform priorities in 2011 (rightfully dubbed «the year of school choice» by the Wall Street Journal).

White Coat Waste, based in Washington, D.C., is the brainchild of Anthony Bellotti, a former Republican strategist who has consulted for campaigns against Obamacare and Planned Parenthood.

Carvin is the brother of attorney Michael Carvin who is arguing against Obamacare before the U.S. Supreme Court.

In November, the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee launched ads castigating Costello for his votes in favor of the GOP tax reform plan and against Obamacare.

Democrats also argued that Republicans who took the House in 2010 campaigning against Obamacare never snatched the Senate from Democratic hands.

Gibson is to the right of center but he's no tea - party wacko, having voted against Obamacare and increased military spending.

So, fundamentally the problem was not about many people being against Obamacare, it's purely a failure to get to an agreement to move the country in a new direction that necessarily requires a large fraction of the country to agree to disagree and work constructively toward implementation.

His mantra against Obamacare focuses on the mandate, like a laser beam.

I guess you could say I'm against Obamacare, but I think it's more fair to say that I'm mad at the system, of which the ACA is a part.

These arguments are, of course, totally irrelevant to understanding how the opposition against Obamacare took hold and how it ultimately got repealed.

@indigochild The question was «Why are so many Americans against Obamacare?»

The ad also gives credit to Zeldin as a state senator that he «successfully led the fight» to partially repeal the MTA payroll tax and that he «led the fight» against Obamacare in the chamber.

He seems to enjoy his globe - trotting consulting career with Herrick, Feinstein law firm, and his House vote against Obamacare earned him the permanent enmity of some Island Dems.

• On March 21st, Carl Paladino wrote to urge Andrew Cuomo to join the federal suit against Obamacare.

The AG lawsuit against Obamacare is a GOP political game.

The whole point is that if you're religious why exactly would you be against Obamacare?

Jeanne's legacy lives on today in some 200 homes operated by the Little Sisters of the Poor, thirty - one of which are in the United States, including the one in Denver which brought the first - ever class lawsuit against Obamacare.

Unfortunatly healthcare providers are a bunch of crooks well - meaning as you «may «be as an employee.If you're a high paid executive the day can't come soon enough that you join the rest of the so - called «Christian «posters against Obamacare in hell.

Prediction: If the Supreme Court rules against Obamacare or whatever you want to call it, the insurance companies will have a green light.

From «A State Revolt Against Obamacare:»

The argument against Obamacare from constitutional norms has been fatally wounded to the extent of winning over persuadables.

Most of the 2012 cycle presidential candidates who marketed themselves as authentic conservatives (which is to say, to the right of Mitt Romney), had very shallow and brittle arguments against Obamacare.

But that was a price many Republicans were willing to pay to get a win against Obamacare and help pass enormous tax cuts for businesses and wealthy Americans.

The National Federation of Independent Business, which led the legal fight against Obamacare, has a series of nuts - and - bolts «healthcare minute» videos and articles on what employers may need to do to comply.

Kimmel has since actively railed against Obamacare repeal efforts, arguing that various proposals being debated by the law's opponents would gut protections for people like Billy born with pre-existing conditions, either by rolling back Obamacare's mandated insurance benefits for certain health conditions or allowing states to set up rules that would let insurers charge sick people more for their coverage.

Not exact matches

Collins, a moderate who voted against the GOP's efforts to repeal and replace Obamacare earlier this year, says the bills will offset the impact of the loss of the individual mandate, but experts largely disagree, arguing that the elimination of the mandate will spike health costs and reduce choice in plans.

Every argument that you'd make against socialism you can make against socialized healthcare, and any candidate who isn't 100 percent committed to scrapping Obamacare is not someone America should elect president.»

Thomas P. Miller, resident fellow at the American Enterprise Institute and co-author of «Why ObamaCare is Wrong for America» (HarperCollins, 2011), cautioned against «reaching broad conclusions» because the subject is so complex.

At least two GOP Senators, Kentucky's Rand Paul and Maine's Susan Collins, are expected to vote against the Graham - Cassidy bill to repeal Obamacare if it comes to the floor.

Why she could vote no: Murkowski previously helped bring down the GOP push to repeal and replace Obamacare, so she has a track record of voting against the party - line on contentious issues.

Rep. Louis Gohmert, R - Texas leaves the Senate chamber on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Sept. 25, 2013, after lending encouragement to Sen. Ted Cruz, R - Texas, with his overnight fight on the floor of the Senate against the Affordable Care Act, popularly known as «Obamacare».

And health insurers, once considered to be a beneficiary of the Affordable Care Act, aren't really a solid Clinton proxy, as many have been withdrawing from the Obamacare marketplaces, casting shade on the law (not to mention that Clinton has spoken out against mergers between some of the largest players, including the proposed Aetna (aet)- Humana (hum) and Anthem (antm)- Cigna (ci) deals).

The Republican wave in 2010 was fueled by voter backlash against Obama's policies, headlined by the health care law that quickly became known as «Obamacare.»

That's on top of other Republican senators who have recently warned against a hasty Obamacare repeal sans a replacement (albeit for a range of reasons) like Kentucky's Rand Paul, Arizona's John McCain, Arkansas» Tom Cotton, and Tennessee's Lamar Alexander, who heads the influential Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) committee in the Senate.

Here's some of what's going on in the health care world as we head into Easter weekend: payers are pushing back against PTC Therapeutcics» controversial Duchenne muscular dystropy drug; insurers are cautiously lauding new rules for Obamacare's marketplaces; a fascinating lawsuit in Arkansas explores the ethics of drug making; and a new test for Zika virus can produce results within an hour.

* OBAMACARE BECOMES WEAPON FOR DEMS: The New York Times reports that the tables have turned, and Democrats are using the Republicans» failed repeal vote as a weapon against them in multiple House races:

He makes a FALSE CHARGE against «Obamacare».

We need a single payer system, but since the GOP and Tea Party considers helping their fellow man against their religion, we have «Obamacare».

That risk averseness worked against Obama prior to the passage of Obamacare and is working in his favor now.

«I suspect if the option they were given included «Obamacare» in the prompt, evangelicals were responding in a partisan way against the name as much as for the priority.»

And since it will be possible to defeat Obamacare's Free Birth Control Rule against religious objectors without requiring constitutional analysis, I think the controversy will not require adjudication by the Supreme Court.

It's insane how often the same people that want to legislate morality (i.e. forbid gay marriage, abortion, pot) are the same against legislating other behaviors (i.e. what size soda you can sell, Obamacare).

Although, I guess that is the essence of the fight against «Obamacare» as a whole anyway.

But they talked nothing but economics — against bailouts and being stimulated, against the fiscal disaster that ObamaCare will be, for the «fair tax,» against the tax burden that are the children of illegal immigrants, and against the huge debt given us by the combo of Bush and Obama.