Sentences with phrase «against reading as»

That was exactly what happened against Reading as Mesut Ozil and Alexis Sanchez were responsible for the main flashes of quality to scrape the Gunners into the final.

Not exact matches

The whole conversation, permissible as a result of a search warrant against Hernandez, reads:

«Kanye West has a right to free speech, and he has the right to spout lies and misinformation and misplaced opinions — but we as consumers have the right to fight back against this type of dangerous propaganda,» it read.

I was out of the box early on Trump's «Germans are bad» rant, as I've long inveighed against the dominant DC notion that trade... Read more

To get into a few specifics, pre-ticked boxes — which is essentially what Facebook is deploying here, with a big blue «accept and continue» button designed to grab your attention as it's juxtaposed against an anemic «manage data settings» option (which if you even manage to see it and read it sounds like a lot of tedious hard work)-- aren't going to constitute valid consent under GDPR.

While there is no such thing as a 100 % foolproof strategy to protect you against fraud (although divvying your portfolio up into 30 - 40 stocks worth 2.5 % to 3.33 % of your overall wealth seems like a damn good defense mechanism), putting most of your money into stocks with records of growing dividends seems like an intelligent way to guard against corporate fraud, particularly if you have limited familiarity with reading 10 - Ks, annual reports, and other financial statements.

In a Facebook post that reads as if Rivera wrote it while wiping away tears, he writes that Ailes is «a deceitful, selfish misogynist, if the charges against him are true.»

I mention this as a pre-emptive strike against those who read what I am going to say about Canadian real estate and respond with: «This guy has no authority to say anything about real estate, he's never sold a house or developed anything.»

-LRB-...) One reading of this extraordinary outcome is that it was a protest against the painful spending cuts, tax increases, and economic reforms that Monti's government implemented as a precondition (albeit an unstated one) for European Central Bank support.

If you read this, I forgot to mention leverage in the above video as well which is another massive negative point against Forex.

Such a devastating experience has led both old and young traders to seek out crypto as hedges against another failed currency episode,» the statement read.

im glad no - one believes in demons - the devil or god — and they try to rationalise everything — and discredit the bible — just shows me where we are at in the holy book — see if i remember, the end times come when «scorners and scoffers abound» when — wrong is called right and right is called wrong — and people would be married and given in marriage as in the daysd of noah --- sodom and gammorah had gay issues badly - im just gonna laugh and alaugh and laugh when ya «ll burn - do me a favor — at least read the bible once — see what it says before you — go against it.

Only a radical Muslim reads this verse as Observer does in order to justify brutality against their wives and others.

To me it reads as if you think that being liberal is somehow inferior to being conservative, and because «rebelling against» anything is often associated with juveniles.

I enjoyed reading your comments against Richard Rohr with a smile on my face as I imagine he is smiling too.

State a negative and then instruct everyone to look up the «Mormon War» which is a dissertation written by Mormons to defend themselves against murdering 120 Methodists, men women and children at a place called «Mountain Meadow Massacre» (which should not be read on wikipedia — the Mormons have rewritten that as well).

If you REALLY want to learn about your religion, read materials that offer compelling arguments AGAINST you interests and thoughtfully consider them in light of what you were TOLD as a child.

Secondly, as a priest ordained in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... This is exactly what happens when a gay priest turned professor what to justify his perverted lifestyle... I rest my case

I have sat in the shade leaning against its rough, ridged bark, noticing how its roots distend and break through the surface of the soil, as I read a book or watch my children ride their bikes.

What we read in the Old Testament should not be interpreted as God's approval of such crimes against the human person, but rather we should see how far humanity had to mature, be healed and be guided by God in these times before Jesus Christ's revealing and redeeming work for us.

(CNN)- As I have read recent neoconservative diatribes against President Obama's nominee for secretary of defense, former Sen. Chuck Hagel - including charges that he is an anti-Semite and a full - page advertisement attacking him in The New York Times on Thursday - I have asked myself, «What would George Washington do?»

The full record, as I have read it, actually shows that Tony has actually written against Driscoll's spiritual abuses so many times that one might actually conclude Tony is an example of how the church DOES SOMETIMES CONFRONT ABUSE.

«Lately I haven't had time to read the papers, as I have been building a mouseproof closet against a rain of mice.

I don't read any atheists on here supporting the selling of 6 - year - old girls as slaves or discriminating against women and the handicapped like the Bible does..

Take a stand against the electrification of reading and consider the following, in properly bound form, as gifts for those on your Christmas — not «Holiday» — list: Continue Readingreading and consider the following, in properly bound form, as gifts for those on your Christmas — not «Holiday» — list: Continue ReadingReading»

This is what a comprehensive contextual reading of Scripture leads to, instead of having to balance apparently contradictory texts against each other when they are plucked out as «proof texts.»

Secondly, as a priest ordained in Rome where he knows that the Basilica would be totally against his assertion, he uses euphemisms to cloud the mind of a reader thinking quoting wrong scriptures with the intent to seduce would suffice — his own roots denounce his deeds and / or beliefs but he axiomatically wants to hold both the roots and wings to no avail, read the book and the truth shall set you free... I rest my case

(Wright offers some specific suggestions for preserving a liturgically - grounded reading of scripture — including warnings against dropping certain portions of scripture from liturgical readings because they are startling or strange, as well as warnings against making sermons the focus of corporate worship — that we don't have time to discuss in detail here.)

I wish someone had told that to the Reformers, some of whom were burned for translating the Bible into their native languages so people could read it, who argued for salvation by grace against a salvation by works Gospel, who argued for Jesus as the son of God, uncreated, instead of just one among many of «God's» created beings.

Origen, however, is part of the debate, for he warns against reading the creation account in Genesis as a scientific description of the world's beginnings.

«Until we know the power of divine grace, we read in the Bible concerning eternal punishment, and we think it is too heavy and too hard, and we are apt to kick against it, and find out some heretic or other who teaches us another doctrine; but when the soul is really quickened by divine grace, and made to feel the weight of sin, it thinks the bottomless pit none too deep, and the punishment of hell none too severe for sin such as it has committed.

I will give you two examples, Exodus 4:24 -26 indicate that Zipporah read about Hebrew tradition of circumcision and used that knowledge against Moses who grow up as an Egyptian and God sort out to kill him for not following that tradition.

Eliade, as a fine Historian of Religion, has made us see the wider spectrum of religious experience within which and against which NT can be read.

So reading this article was uplifting, as I know much of the world today is very much against God and against Faith in general, but He continues to touch hearts.

The tension that Israel knew throughout her life as a nation between faith in an electing, acting, covenanting God on the one hand, and on the other the rational improbability, if not absurdity, of the divine promises implicit in her faith; the conflict between the divine demand to trust and the human doubt; the incongruity between divine promise for the nation and the incredible historical odds against fulfillment — all of this Israel is mindful of in the shaping of the stories, and in the reading and cherishing of the stories.

The idea that Catholic just war teaching begins with a «presumption against war,» more recently phrased as «a strong presumption against the use of force,» first appears in the United States bishops» widely read 1983 pastoral letter, The Challenge of Peace.

Levenson's reading of biblical texts suggests a view of creation as «combat» against the onslaughts of chaos.

I don't think God will hold a grudge against someone because they acted as a «chirstian» rather than read the Bible cover to cover.

I don't consider myself «postmodern» or «emerging» but most of the postmodern / emerging philosophy and theology I have read is a reaction against a modern philosophy and theology which overemphasized «the many» (the human ability to figure things out on our own), and as a result, is not too humanistic, but is almost excessively spiritual.

Since the Bible is written in androcentric, grammatically masculine language that can function as generic inclusive or as patriarchal exclusive language, feminist interpretation must develop a hermeneutics of critical evaluation for proclamation that is able to assess theologically whether scriptural texts function to inculcate patriarchal values, or whether they must be read against their linguistic «androcentric grain» in order to set free their liberating vision for today and for the future.

I read somewhere that in Argentina he has not been as dogmatic as his successors on the Catholic Church's ban against birth control.

It has since been altered to say in the Lord's Prayer, «Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us» Read for yourself at:

We read scripture searching for attributes and end up interpreting things out of context often as we search for data points to or against our hypothesis of God.

My question to the non-believers is as follows: without reading, comprehending and abiding in Truth (wisdom), how does a non-believer put on breaks or have any break as to not trespass against another????

Spew and hate, read the same article you did I don't recall Mr Cathy using those words it sounds like you are the one ready to use those words when you don't like what you hear, as for the other I did misspell and I do understand that officials are the ones ready to discriminate against those whoever they are were elected to serve with their own opinion.

But as i read it, and many others, it reads as command toward the heathen ritual, and not against the action itself.

This can be read both as a forthright advance accusation against the Pharisees as murderers (12:7 - 8), and also as a prediction of the rejection by God of the Jews (verses 9 - 10).

Too often the debate between a Bernard of Clairvaux and a Peter Abelard is read in terms of the latter's so - called heterodoxy when it was just as much about Bernard's progressive vision of a church disentangled from the control of secular princes over against Abelard's more conservative view of an ordered relation of patronage and rule between secular rulers and sacred institutions.

It appears to me to be in any case gratuitous to read, as Gunkel does (in an argument against the historicity of the event), «dass Elias die 450 Propheten Baals mit eigener Hand geschlachtet habe» (Hermann Gunkel, Elias, Jahwe und Baal, Tubingen: 1906, p. 36).

You know, please rest your conscience here as you read I am not an authority AT ALL as youll come to see, My lord has pulled me out of church the holy spirit filled church where I recieved Christ, and told me to visit ALL churches, oh and by the way 6 years ago The Lord asked me to open an out reach food pantry and safe haven for the needy, in the city that we live in, anyway this journey was humbling, God always shows me I am the stinker, that its my flesh that wars against the spirit, So many people are worried about satan, and demons or bad freinds or family or other religions, Yeah it makes you wonder 1st is it the same bible Im reading Jesus said it is finished!