If an animal pushes a branch up
against a heat source, it will smoke but almost never burn.
Not exact matches
Back to the country that has been a constant
source of fascination and frustration for now nearly the past four years, back to the city that, despite it turning into such a tourist hub, still offers so much more to discover, back to the
heat and humidity, back to the constant battle
against mosquitoes and back to putting chilies on my food instead of salt and pepper.
Further, I am not at all convinced that the treatise presented here is a strong case
against increased CO2 (from any
source) adding to the
heating of the Earth's atmosphere.
Isn't correlating
against something that constitutes only 2.5 % of the
heating when one is looking for the
source of the
heating a rather meaningless exercise?