Kansas City, MO — Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically unnecessary restrictions
against abortion providers in Missouri.
Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains (PPGP) and Reproductive Health Services of Planned Parenthood of the St. Louis Region (PPSLR) celebrate today's federal court opinion, which blocks medically unnecessary restrictions
against abortion providers in Missouri.
Targeted restrictions
against abortion providers (TRAP) that place unreasonable requirements on health care centers, slowly erode access to abortion, have nothing to do with improving the health or safety of women — and have everything to do with politics
PPGP opened its new health center so that patients have one more trusted option in Oklahoma City and we will continue providing the excellent care patients have come to know and trust, in spite of some of the toughest medically unnecessary restrictions
against abortion providers in the nation,» Planned Parenthood Great Plains President and CEO, Laura McQuade said.
Not exact matches
In 2017, he voted
against allowing states to divert money away from
abortion providers.
She says there's a documented «deeply troubling history» of violence
against groups that defend a women's right to choose
abortion, including murders of
abortion providers, like Buffalo obstetrician Bernard Slepian, as well as clinic bombings and arsons.
More than a dozen state and congressional investigations were launched in response to the videos; none found evidence leading to charges
against Planned Parenthood, other
abortion providers, or companies that receive and process the tissue.
Second, President Obama signaled his intention to repeal a rule promulgated in the last days of the Bush administration that codified previous law ensuring that no health care
providers at institutions receiving federal funds should be discriminated
against for refusing to participate in
abortion or sterilization procedures.
First, the state moved to ban Planned Parenthood health centers from participating in the Women's Health Program, based solely on the fact that these centers were associated with other sites where
abortions were provided; Planned Parenthood health centers had been serving about four in 10 women in the program statewide, and some sites served as many as eight in 10 women within their service areas.22 The Obama administration made clear that Texas» action violated federal law by discriminating
against qualified
providers.
Cruz has been nearly monomaniacal in his fervor
against abortion — even attempting to shut the government down again in 2015 over federal funding for Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest
provider of reproductive health care.
On April 11, Texas Planned Parenthood family planning
providers who do not perform
abortions filed suit
against the Texas Health and Human Services Commission (HHSC) in federal court in order to protect Texan women's access to basic, preventive health services.
Meanwhile, the reckless, dangerous actions by anti-
abortion extremists have created a poisonous environment that has fed acts of violence
against Planned Parenthood health centers and other
abortion providers.
Yesterday, a 2 - 1 decision, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a case brought by the Center for Reproductive Rights on behalf of several Texas
abortion providers, ruled
against Texas women and allowed
abortion restrictions to eviscerate women's access to safe and legal
abortion in the state.
«Judge Warren Wilbert's decision makes it crystal clear that there is no justification for vigilante violence
against health care
providers who perform
abortions.
Planned Parenthood Advocates in Missouri, NARAL Pro-Choice Missouri, and the ACLU of Missouri testified
against this measure that would force
abortion providers to offer Missouri's «informed consent» booklet to people who ask about
abortion outside of Missouri.
It is already
against federal law to prevent Planned Parenthood or other health care
providers from participating in Title X simply because they also provide
abortion.
It is already
against federal law to prevent health care
providers from participating in Title X because they also provide
abortion.
The state of Texas» sustained campaign
against Planned Parenthood and other family planning clinics affiliated with
abortion providers appears to have led to an increase in births among low - income women who lost access to affordable and effective birth control, a new study says.
The measure nullifies an Obama - era rule that was enacted specifically to protect Planned Parenthood from the GOP's passionate crusade
against the reproductive health organization, and will allow individual states to single out
abortion providers and deny them Title X funding for political reasons.