Today's celebration would, perhaps, have been impossible without his steely disposition to always stand
against all acts not in consonance with decency, probity and justice.
Not exact matches
At least you won't
act against it.
They are criminal
acts perpetrated primarily, though
not exclusively,
against girls and women who have to spend years afterward keeping their secrets quiet, hoping that eventually someone will help them find the words to describe the injustices they've suffered.
They're
not, and when you see a customer
acting against his or her own interests, you must say something, Callaway advises.
With respect to the June 2016 Trump Tower meeting, Trump Jr. initially said in a statement that it was
not related to campaign issues and that they had primarily discussed Russian adoptions and the 2012 Magnitsky
Act, which Veselnitskaya aggressively lobbies
against.
On the contrary, the mechanics of primary races, it seems, are pushing the GOP to
act not only
against the interest of the country, but that of the party itself.
And health insurers, once considered to be a beneficiary of the Affordable Care
Act, aren't really a solid Clinton proxy, as many have been withdrawing from the Obamacare marketplaces, casting shade on the law (
not to mention that Clinton has spoken out
against mergers between some of the largest players, including the proposed Aetna (aet)- Humana (hum) and Anthem (antm)- Cigna (ci) deals).
«This will be the single biggest expulsion for over thirty years and it reflects the fact that this is
not the first time that the Russian State has
acted against our country,» May said.
Following up on that offer, a second remarketing campaign tested a $ 5 discount
against a 10 % discount if the customer still hadn't
acted 72 hours later.
The sites, which often
act as launching pads for smear campaigns
against entertainment properties that users don't like for one reason or another, are being credited for sinking films before they even see the light of day.
Fines and penalties
against Wells Fargo Bank for their bad
acts against their customers and others will
not be dropped, as has incorrectly been reported, but will be pursued and, if anything, substantially increased.
He said customers and potential employees should
act against companies which do
not «get» gender diversity.
Levandowski and his co-founder, Lior Ron, would
not agree to sell their company to Uber unless they were protected
against any potential future lawsuits, including those that occurred as a result of any «pre-signing bad
acts.»
This lack of transparency could actually also be grounds for yet more legal action
against Trump, in fact, since it looks very likely that it's a violation of the Federal Advisory Committee
Act to
not hold these advisory meetings from business leaders open to the public, though the administration denies any of its actions have contravened this order.
This is
not the first time the company is
acting against clickbait headlines.
Mr. Trump also spoke at length about the standoff with armed protesters who last Saturday seized the headquarters at a federal wildlife refuge in Oregon, suggesting that he would have called the leader of the group to try to make a deal to end it — and would have
acted against them if negotiations failed because «you can
not let people take over federal property.»
The Democrats, meanwhile, were
not against selective
acts of protection for industries from areas they represented but generally stood for low tariffs and free trade.
The extent to which Mr. Cohen was
acting on his own in striking the agreement with Ms. Clifford and paying her is crucial
not only to Ms. Clifford's case but also to the complaint
against the Trump campaign and the Trump Organization filed with the Federal Election Commission.
Referring to the decision, a spokesman for Sweden's Financial Supervisory Authority said that «every institution must decide on the details of their internal regulations specifying the rules for their employees» investments and trading,» suggesting that the regulatory agency does
not intend to interfere in Nordea's decision, nor
act against similar moves that may be taken by other companies.
While the USPTO does
not investigate complaints or participate in any legal proceedings
against invention promoters / promotion firms, under the American Inventors Protection
Act of 1999, the USPTO will provide a public forum for the publication of complaints concerning invention promoters / promotion firms.
Actual results may vary materially from those expressed or implied by forward - looking statements based on a number of factors, including, without limitation: (1) risks related to the consummation of the Merger, including the risks that (a) the Merger may
not be consummated within the anticipated time period, or at all, (b) the parties may fail to obtain shareholder approval of the Merger Agreement, (c) the parties may fail to secure the termination or expiration of any waiting period applicable under the HSR
Act, (d) other conditions to the consummation of the Merger under the Merger Agreement may
not be satisfied, (e) all or part of Arby's financing may
not become available, and (f) the significant limitations on remedies contained in the Merger Agreement may limit or entirely prevent BWW from specifically enforcing Arby's obligations under the Merger Agreement or recovering damages for any breach by Arby's; (2) the effects that any termination of the Merger Agreement may have on BWW or its business, including the risks that (a) BWW's stock price may decline significantly if the Merger is
not completed, (b) the Merger Agreement may be terminated in circumstances requiring BWW to pay Arby's a termination fee of $ 74 million, or (c) the circumstances of the termination, including the possible imposition of a 12 - month tail period during which the termination fee could be payable upon certain subsequent transactions, may have a chilling effect on alternatives to the Merger; (3) the effects that the announcement or pendency of the Merger may have on BWW and its business, including the risks that as a result (a) BWW's business, operating results or stock price may suffer, (b) BWW's current plans and operations may be disrupted, (c) BWW's ability to retain or recruit key employees may be adversely affected, (d) BWW's business relationships (including, customers, franchisees and suppliers) may be adversely affected, or (e) BWW's management's or employees» attention may be diverted from other important matters; (4) the effect of limitations that the Merger Agreement places on BWW's ability to operate its business, return capital to shareholders or engage in alternative transactions; (5) the nature, cost and outcome of pending and future litigation and other legal proceedings, including any such proceedings related to the Merger and instituted
against BWW and others; (6) the risk that the Merger and related transactions may involve unexpected costs, liabilities or delays; (7) other economic, business, competitive, legal, regulatory, and / or tax factors; and (8) other factors described under the heading «Risk Factors» in Part I, Item 1A of BWW's Annual Report on Form 10 - K for the fiscal year ended December 25, 2016, as updated or supplemented by subsequent reports that BWW has filed or files with the SEC.
Regardless of the fact that the USA is
not acting unilaterally as our left wing media is trying to sell us they are; there are 38 countries that have supplied troops and only three European countries that voted
against us, with all three involved in the Oil for Food Scandal.
According to the New York Times, «Known as the Freelance Isn't Free
Act, the measure requires anyone hiring a freelance worker to agree in writing to a timetable and procedure for payment, and increases the potential awards to freelancers bringing legal complaints
against those who have failed to pay them promptly.»
Dear Abby hopeless Mom and wife ism, you have been bored in suburb by sexual fantasies pool boy, hooker and Abbyism, feeling guilty, by committing Abbyism fantasy
not with husband ism
against innocent of marriage, now it is time for vibrator to leave Abbyism, faithful ism and Abby adultry ism, hopeless romantic ism, be sexual fantasies pool boy and
act according to lust of American housewife boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT, free yourself from sexual fantasies pool boy, filth of genitals is, fantasy, you two martini's at noon micro bikini pizza dare and
act like slut by flaunting hot bod of massage therapist ism of One mom under boredom with hubby muscular suntan ism GOD HE»S HOT and bulge inequality.
Because He can
not force us to love or believe in Him, there must be a place separate from Him and His redeeming
act on the cross for those who have sinned
against Him.
Yet so - called «loving christians» say worse than that regularly in these blogs
against «unbelievers», so don't
act all offended and shocked.
Atheist morality is without any objective basis and, if followed with integrity, doesn't allow them to
act against others who
act contrary to their moral system (as they insist that each subjective moral judgment is equal in value, all being based purely on individual feelings).
Not just Osama and his ilk, but all those who, under the cover of self - righteous religious piety, allowed their indifference and cowardice to empower
acts of bloodshed
against their brothers, sisters, and children.
It won't be because of Clinton, it's because Obama is improving things, even though Republicans have
acted against the nation's well - being in order to try to defeat him.
Of course, you notably worded it as «won't let us catch them», when what is really meant by calling the terrorists cowards is how they hide amongst civilians, perform heinous
acts of terrorism
against civilians and then run off and hide in tunnels, houses, caves, etc, forever afraid to show their faces.
'' «If any man's wife goes astray and is unfaithful to him, 13 and a man has intercourse with her and it is hidden from the eyes of her husband and she is undetected, although she has defiled herself, and there is no witness
against her and she has
not been caught in the
act, 14 if a spirit of jealousy comes over him and he is jealous of his wife when she has defiled herself, or if a spirit of jealousy comes over him and he is jealous of his wife when she has
not defiled herself, 15 the man shall then bring his wife to the priest, and shall bring as an offering for her one - tenth of an ephah of barley meal; he shall
not pour oil on it nor put frankincense on it, for it is a grain offering of jealousy, a grain offering of memorial, a reminder of iniquity.
Feminist writers have rightfully long argued that pornography» promotes a (cultural) climate in which
acts of sexual hostility directed
against women are
not only tolerated but ideologically encouraged.»
Evangicals are
not being true to jesus, they are directly
acting against what he said to do.
If the horror of CIA is its abstract impersonality, that is also its impenetrable advantage: for we can
not act against what is vastly beyond our power to see and believe.
On March 20, he held a mock trial of the Muslim Holy Book, and the jury — consisting of twelve people from his congregation — found the book guilty of five «crimes
against humanity,» including the promotion of terrorist
acts and «the death, rape and torture of people worldwide whose only crime is
not being of the Islamic faith.»
His only judgments came
against the religious leaders who were judged
not for their sins but, because they lived in continual judgment of any who did
not act just like they did and because they failed to extend grace and love to those who needed it the most.
Your going to end up sick if you keep letting it eat away at you so much, and quit being a hypocrite by accusing others for
not acting Christian and then turn around and talk
against them the way you do.
Let's
not act like «crusades» and relations are something that compete
against each other but that complement each other.
The statement continued, «Indeed, this is
not about the church wanting to force anybody to do anything; it is instead about the federal government forcing the church — consisting of its faithful and all but a few of its institutions — to
act against church teachings.»
On the other hand, I believe he also tought that performing an
act which we believe to be sin will be counted as sin
against us wether or
not it is scriptural.
It can deal with the consequences of injustice but can
not act against the bases of injustice; it is concerned for the misery of some individuals but does
not see the multitude of the poor.
This article will summarise Fr Edward Holloway's arguments
against contraception while also arguing that Natural Family Planning is a good but
not «perfect» use of the marriage
act.
I concluded at the time of the riots that of all the things the government now needed to do, it was the married family which most urgently needed to be rebuilt: I was and remain as certain of that as anything I have ever written, and I have been saying it repeatedly for over 20 years: I was saying it, for instance, when I was attacking (in The Mail and also The Telegraph), as it went through the Commons, the parliamentary bill which became that disastrous piece of (Tory) legislation called the Children
Act 1989, which abolished parental rights (substituting for them the much weaker «parental responsibility»), which encouraged parents
not to spend too much time with their children, which even, preposterously, gave children the right to take legal action
against theirparents for attempting to discipline them, which made it «unlawful for a parent or carer to smack their child, except where this amounts to «reasonable punishment»;» and which specified that «Whether a «smack» amounts to reasonable punishment will depend on the circumstances of each case taking into consideration factors like the age of the child and the nature of the smack.»
It would appear to be something of a shock,
not to say disappointment, to The Tablet's mindset, but a Catholic who has
acted against Church teaching does
not necessarily join that magazine in attempting to justify their action through dissent.
If a person has sinned
against another, he ought to make amends as far as possible, «beg pardon» in a vital and
not merely a perfunctory manner, and
act in the future with good will and right conduct toward the person injured.
But they do
not follow by a special
act of divine wrath or retribution; they follow by the reaction of God's loving power
against that which violates love.
You defenders of religion keep some interesting company: Osama Bin LLaden, Iraninan Mullahs, Saudi Wahabists (who will cut your head off in public if you preach anything but Islam), Joe Smith who preached that black people did
not have souls (the church changed it mind after the civil rights
act and are now bigotted
against gay people), the Taliban, the pope and his child rapists, ignorant & stupid evangelicals who think that revelations is a roadmap to the future.
He did
not know whether any allowance was made for the age of the accused nor «whether pardon is given to those who repent» nor «whether punishment attaches to the mere name apart from secret crimes, or to the secret crimes connected with the name».3 In reply, Trajan wrote that Christians «are
not to be sought out, but if they are accused and convicted, they must be punished — yet on this condition, that whoso denies himself to be a Christian, and makes the fact plain by his action, that is by worshipping our gods, shall obtain pardon on his repentance, however suspicious his past conduct may be».4 The Emperor Hadrian (76 - 138; ruled 117 - 138) made clear that slanderous accusations
against Christians were unacceptable and that it had to be proved that they had
acted contrary to the laws.
I don't indorse this sort of thing but reason and appeals to humanity haven't stopped their terrorism so maybe if every
act of terror they commit
against us is met with an
act of terrorism
against them they'll stop.
The biggest sin that most of us muslims have committed is
not speaking loudly enough
against those who
act that way.