According to this indestructible hope the Spirit of the Church will always provide sufficiently for a faithful people as his body and thus prevent a revolution
against the constitution of the Church that would destroy her.
Kaduna State chapter of the party described Sheriff's reinstatement by the appellate court as an act of impunity, which was
against the constitution of the party.
Kekemeke, who had complained to the South - West zonal office of the party over the matter, however, said he was never removed as the chairman, maintaining that the action of the SEC against him was
against the constitution of the party.
They are mandated to jail, detain and deny bail to any perceived enemy of the regime even when this means going
against the Constitution of Nigeria.
A neo-Communist insurrection
against the Constitution of the United States.
Not exact matches
A nationwide assortment
of state cybersecurity regulations «raises the issue
of whether such regulations violate the U.S.
Constitution's «dormant» Commerce Clause, which restricts states» ability to discriminate
against or unduly burden interstate commerce,» write Matthew A. Schwartz and Corey Omer for the Clearing House, a banking and payments trade group.
Half a million people took to the streets
of Romania
against the Romanian government's plans to tinker with the
constitution.
By selling the bonds to Monaco, investors were trying to get around the 11th Amendment to the U.S.
Constitution, which says, «The judicial power
of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted
against one
of the United States by citizens
of another state, or by citizens or subjects
of any foreign state.»
They said the new version still discriminates
against Muslims in violation
of the U.S.
Constitution.
Many provinces have intervened in the case
against Comeau, while a team
of lawyers with an interest in the constitutional issues offered to represent him for free, and the Canadian
Constitution Foundation volunteered its assistance.
Irish women will mark the day with a strike in protest
against the eighth amendment
of the Irish
Constitution, which bans abortion.
OC Weekly's R. Scott Moxley characterizes the more extensive program shown in the new filings as an effort «to sidestep the U.S.
Constitution's prohibition
against warrantless invasions
of private property.»
Trump asks judge to dismiss emoluments lawsuit
against him: «President Donald Trump has asked a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit accusing him
of violating the
Constitution's Emoluments Clause related to private payments from other governments.
Detroit school students, represented by the Los Angeles - based public interest firm Public Counsel, filed suit last month
against the state
of Michigan, claiming a legal right to literacy based on the 14th Amendment to the
Constitution.
When someone calls that Imam one
of the most evil people on the planet, when someone says he wants to build his center to train terrorists, when someone calls for amending the
constitution to exclude Islam, when someone says our founding fathers wanted this to be a Christian nation and that they didn't want Muslims included, when Muslims are afraid to go out because they will be attacked, when Christian pastors are preaching
against Muslims (as opposed to the belief in Islam), THAT is hatred.
But there are plenty
of ways
of identifying those abuses without misinterpreting the
Constitution and further weakening its barriers
against an all - encompassing government.
And the court has given states broad immunity from being sued in any court for money damages — for example, for infringing a patent or discriminating
against older or disabled state employees — even though the
Constitution limits this immunity only to suits in federal court by a citizen
of a different state.
Oh boy, care to explain how you think one small ruling is going to impact the
Constitution when so much has already gone
against the hype
of your belief system?
On the basis
of the First Amendment, as well as the general principles
of the
Constitution, he opposed public payment for chaplains in Congress and the military, spoke out
against national proclamations
of days
of prayer (though as president he did «recommend» them) and while president vetoed congressional efforts to incorporate churches in the District
of Columbia (fullest statement, V: 103 - 105) At the same time, Madison frequently opined that it was appropriate for private citizens to support chaplains and various kinds
of semiorganized public religion through voluntary contributions (V: 104,105)
This untoward result - interpreting a
Constitution intended to guarantee religious liberty as requiring affirmative discrimination
against people
of faith - would seem to be the necessary result
of a doctrine
of separation that invalidates government action that lacks a «secular purpose» or has the effect
of «advanc [ing]... religion» (Lemon v. Kurtzman [1970]-RRB-.
The Chief Justice, in dissent, complained about the majority's «entirely gratuitous» aspersions
against supporters
of traditional marriage: «It is one thing for the majority to conclude that the
Constitution protects a right to same - sex marriage; it is something else to portray everyone who does not share the majority's «better informed understanding» as bigoted.»
The most explicit statement
of these limitations is in the
Constitution's first ten amendments — the Bill
of Rights — which guarantee freedom
of religion, speech, press, assembly, and petition, the right to bear arms, protection
against the obligatory quartering
of soldiers, security from unwarranted search and seizure, the right to a grand jury, protection
against double jeopardy and self - incrimination, the right
of due process, just compensation for private property taken for public use, and speedy public trial by jury without excessive fines or bail.
After antifederalist riots at Carlisle, Franklin returned to the scene with a satire
against the rioters, comparing them to the ancient Jews who rejected a
constitution handed down by God and «recorded in the most faithful
of all Histories, the Holy Bible.»
By republican structure,
of course, I mean the separation
of powers and the elaborate checks and balances that the founders
of our country wrote into the
Constitution as the main bulwarks
against dictatorship and tyranny, which they greatly feared.
But it is important to add that when the framers
of the
Constitution envisioned the rough - and - tumble world
of public argument, they almost certainly imagined heated disagreements
against a background
of broadly shared values; certainly that was the model offered by John Locke.
The reason
of Jefferson and Paine and
of what Henry May calls the Moderate Enlightenment that informed the
Constitution did not rebel
against the providential order, but at most rejected the received ways
of understanding that order» tradition, authority, revelation, scripture» in favor
of trusting in fresh human intellect.
Shepard goes to great lengths to show the negative consequences
of ordering human societies in ways that work
against our genetic
constitution.
The declaration highlighted that, despite the Russian
Constitution guaranteeing every citizen the right to freedom
of religion or belief, Russian authorities «continue to foster an atmosphere
of intolerance, discrimination and persecution
against religious minorities throughout the entire Federation».
The miracle
of the Apostolic
Constitution is that for a later generation, that hope is no longer «
against hope».
The U.S.
Constitution gives the president the power «to grant Reprieves and Pardons for Offences
against the United States, except in Cases
of Impeachment,» and at least several
of the Founding Fathers thought that such a power was important to the usual and normal order
of government....
This was
against the spirit
of the
Constitution.
The events
of the past 12 eras have renewed in us the conviction that we loose great dangers when our devotion to our Revolution, for the Declaration and the
Constitution, lie dormant; or, equally great dangers when this devotion becomes unchained passion, a tempestuous agent to cloud our judgment when incautiously directed
against distant nations.
In his famous interview, Danielou warned
against such arguments, saying that «with the pretext
of reacting
against formalism» there has arisen a «false conception
of freedom that brings with it the devaluing
of the
constitutions and rules and exalts spontaneity and improvisation» and an «erroneous conception
of the changing
of man and
of the Church.»
«14 Can we not see in those words the sentiments
of an old republican, aware
of the compromises contained in the new
Constitution but hoping almost
against hope that the republican virtue
of the people would offset them, at least for a time?
The right concludes, finally, that groups and localities must defend themselves militarily
against an alien, hostile state which is seeking to uproot the
Constitution in favor
of «one - world government.»
Having said all that, the Muslims do have the right to create a center at a place
of their own choosing, regardless
of the noises made by Newt and others promoters
of stupidity in America, long as they are not promoting laws that are not only
against the
constitution but
against the dignity
of what we know as humans, we can not legalize any killing fields.
Against that, the displaced people claim the right to life (Art 21
of the
Constitution)... One
of the aims
of the struggle is to protect the material base for creative life - centred life - sustaining activities.
Although the power
of Congress to forbid slavery in federal territories was well - established, Sandford argued that slaves were private property
of the sort protected by the
Constitution against deprivation without due process
of law, and that therefore Congress lacked any constitutional authority to ban slavery in the territories.
On the question
of natural law, the accusation
against Judge Thomas is that be resists those who would lay a moral foundation for the
Constitution other than the foundation laid by those who wrote and ratified the
Constitution.
Catholic citizens have every reason — including the truth
of the matter — to argue that our
Constitution is much more democratic that our Court now says it is, just as they have every reason to argue that our Framers never meant «liberty» to be used as a wrecking ball deployed
against our indispensable relational «intermediary» institutions — beginning with the family and the church.
In answer to the objection
against the lack
of religious test for an officeholder under the new
Constitution, Isaac Backus, outstanding Baptist minister, gave a stirring speech.
That same phrase, «the doctrine
of nonresistance
against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive
of the good and happiness
of mankind,» is found in both the Maryland and Tennessee
Constitutions.
Business for Sterling mobilised vast numbers
of businesspeople
against the single currency, neutralising the Government's economic case for the euro, and Vote 2004, which gradually evolved into Open Europe, ultimately led the charge
against the EU
Constitution.
The President's oath
of office is irrelevant to amending the
Constitution for two reasons: first, the President has no part in amending it, and second, amending is part
of the
Constitution itself, so there's nothing to «defend»
against.
The powers
of Congress to require military service for the common defense are broad and far - reaching, for while the
Constitution protects
against invasions
of individual rights, it is not a suicide pact.
Oh well if I have the right to chose as a member
of the electorate I will vote
against the EU
Constitution / Lisbon Treaty.
It's quite an ironic detail that the party that spear led the crusade
against calling the Treaty
of Nice a constitutional treaty uses the word
Constitution to govern its own house.
For instance, if all political parties, including the APC which was then in opposition, could hold their primaries in the state, why would the PDP that was in control
of the State Government come down to Abuja for its primaries
against the provisions
of the Electoral Act and the PDP
constitution?
This was at a time when the appointing authorities were not privy to the alleged acts
of misconduct or wrongdoings brought
against him and 21 Circuit Court Judges and Magistrates who have been referred to the Chief Justice to be dealt with in accordance with Article 151
of the 1992
Constitution by tigereyepi for alleged stated misbehaviour.
Specifically, Omo - Agege's bill had stated that the immunity granted to the president, governors and their deputies in section 308 (1)
of the
constitution would no longer apply to criminal proceedings arising from allegations
of financial crimes
against them.