Sentences with phrase «against anyone other»

The issue then was «whether and to what extent the police may take preventive action against anyone other than persons committing or reasonably apprehended as being about to commit a breach of the peace».

There is an exception, however, if you file a personal injury claim against anyone other than your employer.

One truth behind the label «action painting» is that these artists had to stop struggling against anyone other than themselves.

Not exact matches

Of course, short - term is a dirty word that anyone can trot out against others with whom they disagree.

Overall our default perspective probably ought to be against mergers - we should require abundant and specific evidence of large potential gains to convince us that a particular merger is in the best interest of anyone other than management and the investment bankers constructing the deal.

And then there are just people who are worried that the government might use their census data to cross-reference it against other information they've given the government (income being the obvious example - anyone know someone who plays fast and lose with their taxes?).

Where the nuclear arms race pits the larger countries against each other, the cyber arms race includes a much larger number of combatants since it is open to almost anyone with cash and a computer, according to a front - page article in the Wall Street Journal.

What the Qur «an says, regarding the Jews and others, is that anyone who actively goes against God's will deserves to be punished.

We hold on to bitterness against others as if we've never hurt anyone.

And others, like me, will defend him against spurious attacks... even though David does not need us to defend him, nor has asked anyone to defend him.

Before anyone starts yelling about discrimination against Christians and Jews or censorship, it's important to note that the movie adaptation leaves out several other key pieces of the story.

What's more, a casual study into other aspects of my beliefs would reveal that I really don't «have it all sown up»; anyone who knows me personally can testify against that!!!

I too would be outraged if his business was in fact REFUSING service to, or inany other way, discriminating against anyone who didn't BELIEVE as he does!

Moreover, since God is infinitely good to all who truly seek him, I do not see how anyone's experience of grace or formation by grace can settle the truth of one confessional position as against another, and I doet want to look as if I think that the quality of my Christian experience or the strength of my Christian convictions should be decisive in persuading others to accept my views.

I would urge anyone reading this to take WHATEVER ACTIONS POSSIBLE to harm Chick - Fil - A personnel or property, Dan Cathy, other members of the Cathy family, Mike Huckabee, Rick Santorum, Michelle Bachmann, Antonin Scalia, Billy Graham, or their loved ones, to make them pay for the harm they are doing to the people they discriminate against.

I have never been predjudiced against other christians, Jews, Muslims, Athiests, or anyone with other beliefs or disbeliefs.

All three of these Premier League reformers — and many others in the lower divisions — had a propensity to banish anyone who spoke out against them.

Anyone who make's an argument against anyone or any idea by simply calling others idiot, is truly lacking any real ability to articulate logical reason for their opposAnyone who make's an argument against anyone or any idea by simply calling others idiot, is truly lacking any real ability to articulate logical reason for their opposanyone or any idea by simply calling others idiot, is truly lacking any real ability to articulate logical reason for their opposition.

CNN will let any writer attack Christians, but just let anyone say anything against any other religion, the PC Police pounce.

Bear with one another and, if anyone has a complaint against another, forgive each other; just as the Lord has forgiven you, so you also must forgive.

There doesn't seem to be any prohibition against women teaching kids and certainly women can teach other women, but God isn't going to put a calling on anyone or anything that directly contradicts the clear teaching of scripture.

I don't see christian churches teaching people to stone anyone anymore, just to legislate against them (stomping on the first ammendment in the process) in hopes that they can ignore the reality of others not agreeing with everything they say, or not behaving in what they view as the right way.

Equality of all persons is a central and inescapable component of justice, and it deserves special focus because of the world's history of exploitation and violence against women, children, minority groups, and anyone considered as «other.»

Nick, you and others like you, who contend that anyone against Obama are racist, are showing your complete ignorance.

If they turn back, then size them, and slay them wherever ye find them; but take none of them as friends or helpers» - The Koran, (sura 4:90) «Men are superior to women on account of the qualities with which God hath gifted the one above the other,» - sura 4:37 «a blessing on anyone who seizes your babies and shatters them against a rock» - psalms 137:9 (Jerusalem Bible)

We reserve the right, but do not undertake the obligation to: (a) monitor or review the Sites and the Applications for violations of this Agreement and for compliance with our policies; (b) report to law enforcement authorities and / or take legal action against anyone who violates this Agreement; (c) refuse, restrict access to or the availability of, or remove or disable (to the extent technologically feasible) any Contribution or any portion thereof that may violate this Agreement, the law or any of our policies or are excessive in size or burdensome without prior notice to you; (d) manage the Sites and the Applications in a manner designed to protect our and third parties» rights and property or to facilitate the proper functioning of the Sites and the Applications; (e) screen our users or members, or attempt to verify the statements of our users or members and / or (f) monitor disputes between you and other users or to termination or block you and other users for violations of this Agreement.

They have several guards who can create for others, lethal shooters on the outside and a few guys who can simply score at will against anyone..

Ot if anyone is recording the other game watch varane against narkovic on 16mins1 - 1 cb defending as it ahould be.

Also, if Sanchez or any other player wants to go, then it's pointless keeping anyone against their will.

Merson Wright Robson or anyone who has an axe to grind with Arsenal is at it I don't give a shit what they think I support th club and team in general if they play shit we have had more success then most teams Thy seem to Laud spuds but the fukers win nothing they won 2 trophies in 30 yeas but I don't see the media others pulling them up on it like we had when we didn't win anything for 10 years There is definitely an agenda in the media against Arsenal and its sadly spearheaded by ex Arsenal players So I say when they ubfairly attack the club and our existing players they are fair game for retribution from the real fans who lives be the club and will support it through thick and thin.

I will join anyone in railing against guilty parties like Theta Tau and the people who made that video, but I will always fight back against the «paying for friends» argument because, just like many other things in life, not everything is free, and sometimes if you want to affiliate with people who share similar interests as you, it costs money.

Regarding «meeting my approval», I'm not asking for anything other than a measured and justifiable stance from anyone commenting against or with me.

The rest of our team aren't really big enough to win headers, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't get in the box and try and put a loose ball into the net, usually we don't even bother putting anyone but Kosc, Mertesacker and Giroud in the box, even Welbeck isn't in the box half the time... It's a lot easier to defend against 3 people than against 5, when's the last time we defended a corner where the other team only sent 3 or 4 players forward?

Of course there are several other common concerns, like Monreal playing against any top competition, since he proved last year, especially against Bayern, that he will give any class player his dominant foot in and around the box time and time again, or that we still haven't found anyone, other than the mopey Ozil, that can distribute the ball from deeper lying positions, minus the occasional gem from Xhaka, which means that we still spend way too much time trying to pass the ball into the net, but I'll save that for another time

If you can't see that someone who doesn't want to play for us could cause disruption in a team then you have the blinkers on, yes he can score and assist but he also loses the ball more than anyone in this team, there are guys here who want to play for us but get little or no chance at all, if you look at the disruption it has put against fans with some wanting him to stay, others saying get rid, what kind of affect is that going to have with those that work with him.

Anyone who puts Up an argument against a tactic or an issue shud b an example frst.one can't just say hey ure doin it wrong do it ds other way witout having proof of succeeding at it.at ur job ure experienced dan mi so for mi to convince u to do otherwise I must show u proof of wer it's worked before or when I dd it mysef

I think we have sent a message to all the other teams that when we play at our best we can beat anyone in Europe, I think teams will struggle against us if we keep playing like that.

The other problem that I have with this book is that it is & 40; in my opinion & 41; biased against anyone who does start potty training before 3 years old.

Re: last sentence... if you want cheap entertainment, post a question about H1Bs on Slashdot or some other such place and witness how ultra-liberal «anyone against amnesty now is an evil fascist» people there all suddenly turn into heavy - handed protectionists.

The first is that the Conservatives don't even end up as the largest party and Cameron is summarily ejected from Downing Street, in which case he would immediately resign, leaving the way clear for Boris to fight a leadership contest against, in all probability, George Osborne and Theresa May and possibly one or two other, darker horses — odds on Chris Grayling anyone?

But with perfect hindsight, voting against Johnson and Ford in the primaries was more effective than voting for anyone in the other party.

Notably, in 2010, the ACLU testified against «the use of terror watch lists to screen gun purchases,» writing that the «deeply flawed» terror watch list process led the group to conclude, «Given these problems, we do not believe that anyone should be deprived of the right to purchase a gun, or the right to fly, or any other benefit of membership in civil society based solely on placement on a terror watch list.»

(1) that policy does not discriminate against anyone on the grounds of nationality - it is based explicitly on the location of the school the applicant attended (2) it does not favour applicants from Scottish schools over any other country.

«To anyone who thinks you can commit acts of sexual violence or any other violence against women and girls or anyone else in this city, we're here to tell you, you can not.»

[Anyone] who, in public and against the facts, ascribes to the Polish Nation or to the Polish State, responsibility or co-responsibility for Nazi crimes committed by the Third Reich, [as] defined in Article 6 of the Charter of the International Military Tribunal, Annex to the Agreement for the prosecution and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis, signed in London on August 8, 1945 -LSB-...], or for other offences which are crimes against peace [or] humanity or [that are] war crimes, or who otherwise grossly reduces the responsibility of the actual perpetrators of said crimes, is subject to a fine or [to] imprisonment for up to 3 years.

I don't agree with anyone standing against the Labour Party, but in exceptional circumstances like this, when they are treated so abominably by the Party, I appreciate they have no other option.

This could be an important breakthrough: Anyone who has survived a dengue - related illness has then acquired immunity against that specific pathogen, but when it comes to the other three strains, that person is at even greater risk.

And it could be that because men can reproduce throughout their lives, they are less vested in anyone other than their own children; Lummaa is examining whether men continue to procreate into old age, although a monogamous culture such as Finland's argues against it.

As anyone who's gotten sick despite a flu shot knows, a vaccine that protects against one strain of a pathogen doesn't necessarily protect against the others.

Brandan: Arnold Schwarzenegger, Felicia Romero, Jamie Eason, I also admire anyone that has self - confidence, someone that goes against what others tell them they have to do to do what they feel is right.