Sentences with phrase «against anyone under»

Not exact matches

After all, they're under enormous pressure every day to feed the ravenous beast and they'll sell their ads against whatever garbage anyone wants to watch.

seems a bit of a random comment actually, the prodigal son is returning to the father, where did I suggest that God will smash in the face of anyone turning to him, as for those that refuse to accept or even fight against him or not return after turning away the bible is clear they come under the wrath of God.

Of course if anyone looks up, «No man knows my history» by Fawn M. Brodie, or «Under The Banner of Heaven, or Secret Ceremonies: A Mormon Woman's Intimate Diary of Marriage and Beyond,» as well as google different questions about mormon secret names, White Horse Prophesy, Mormons becoming Gods, God was once a man on another planet, mormon bigotry against Blacks, Joseph Smith and his 14 year old wife (WHILE he was still married to his living wife Emma) Helen Mar Kimball... I could go on.

Assuming we've made reconciliation with anyone we may have sinned against, we need to place our guilt of past sins under the cleansing blood of Jesus Christ.

We believe that it is our free speech right not to participate with anyone who uses hateful or hurtful language against a community that is already under attack.

In the first place, it will be hard to win a civil lawsuit brought against the heirs of anyone who was, before 1861, merely operating under the laws of the time.

The United States, under the cover of the «drug war,» is also helping the Colombian military and related paramilitary groups to wage a systematic war against anyone identified with the political left.

The lawsuit cites US obligations under the Refugee Act and the Convention Against Torture to prohibit the government from deporting anyone to a country where he or she is likely to face torture or persecution.

(d) will not post Contributions that: (i) are defamatory, damaging, disruptive, unlawful, inappropriate, offensive, inaccurate, pornographic, vulgar, indecent, profane, hateful, racially or ethnically offensive, obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, threatening, excessively violent, harassing, or otherwise objectionable; (ii) incite, encourage or threaten immediate physical harm against another, including but not limited to, Contributions that promote racism, bigotry, sexism, religious intolerance or harm against any group or individual; or (iii) contain material that solicits personal information from anyone under 13 or exploits anyone in a sexual or violent manner;

Couple that with Wenger's own under - management of players and tactical laziness / disrespect to opposition, and you have yesterday at Anfield, the 6 - 0 at Chelsea, the 5 - 1 at Anfield a few years ago, the 6 - 3 at Man City, the destruction TWICE by Bayern (who claimed we were easy to play against), the weak - willed defeats against anyone well organised like Watford or West Brom, etc..

Koku lamented that in today's NPP under Nana Addo, anyone who shares his opinion against the flag bearer is evil and that can not qualify as a fiber to humility in any sense of the word.

Anyone who uses this information to commit a criminal act against another person is subject to criminal prosecution under New York State law.

Under current Conn. law, anyone who has a restraining order against them is entitled to a hearing before a judge to determine whether the measure is merited.

This is where schools have to strike the right balance between keeping risks under control «so far as is reasonably practicable» and judging the risk of doing something against the cost of not doing it, while taking into account the health and safety of employees and anyone else affected by a school's actions.

Basically, the law states neither government or private units can discriminate against anyone who has filed a bankruptcy or been a debtor under Title 11 or under the Bankruptcy Act.

The DEA's justification for threatening prosecution against anyone who grows the non-drug industrial hemp is that there is no distinction under federal law.

«Many employers may not be aware that as soon as anyone gets diagnosed as having cancer, HIV or multiple sclerosis then they have the same protection as someone with a disability according to the law, and are automatically protected against discrimination under the Equality Act.

The aforementioned 15 U.S.C. § 1129 from the other answer indeed looks somewhat applicable, but I highly doubt that anyone would agree that a random myfirstname individual, one who is not expressly famous or known by any significant proportion of the population under such name, is somehow intrinsically owned a myfirstname.com domain name, just because they're the first one to file a lawsuit against the present owner that's offering it on sale.

Under the measures proposed by the Indian government, anyone would be able to file a complaint against a journalist or organization suspected of spreading fake news.

«Under the agreement, once the Malkins achieve 80 percent approval, anyone who voted against it has 10 days to switch, or they could receive only $ 100 for their share,» The New York Times reports.