Not exact matches
The story flew
against all
science on the matter and it was rare that the front section — also known as the mainstream — asked me for
anything.
Do not think I am saying
anything against science: I am only saying what its job is.
Science doesn't say
anything about god, for or
against, because there is no evidence to base it on.
Over time, top nutritionists in the field and
science - friendly fitness professionals began fighting back
against this misinformation by explaining that food type has relatively little, if
anything, to do with fat loss / muscle gain, and that calories and the macros that make up those calories are much more relevant.
However, I don't like the prospect that some government full of people not even remotely aware of
science (given the other bills
against science that have been entered) has the right to restrict
anything.
Science, if
anything, has the defence that objective measure can be used to argue
against subversion, as it never can be in religion, politics or morality.
Labeling what you oppose a «climate alarm movement» puts a negative tag on
anything that speaks
against your position — be that mainstream
science, concerned dads, or responsible leaders.
If they are doing «research» on the taxpayer's dime, are coming to conclusions which — even on the little data that are available — would be among the falsest and most bogus in the history of
science (if the paper had had
anything recognizable to do with
science in the first place), the question of fraud
against taxpayers arises.
Therefore don't change
anything is the political force that
science is up
against.
I am disappointed that the «CRU e-mails» remain a focus for
anything when the crimes committed
against science are expressly overt in the programming code and that misuse of the database.
If you've ever wondered exactly why the global coal industry has argued so vehemently — first
against the
science of climate change and secondly
against doing
anything about it — the International Energy Agency lays it all out in its latest World Energy Outlook.
Obviously, if we match the outcomes of our actions
against some seraphically ideal world where people can communicate climate
science without eating, breathing, or sitting in cars or buses, then
anything we actually do is going to fall short of the ideal.