nice to see constructive for and
against argument rather then «wengers a old tw*t etc» where have u been?
Not exact matches
Most significantly, Duddington argues
against the charge that permitting an increasing role for religion in the legal and political (i.e., public) spheres would necessitate the imposition of one system of belief upon another, by re-emphasising the
argument that Christianity does not serve to generate a moral code, but
rather provides a vehicle through which it may be discovered.
The Wahhabi movement in Arabia was a reaction
against the worship of saints, but it made use of force
rather than
arguments, and failed to establish a general reform.
One
argument which has been attempted
against its historicity has been that there are ancient accounts of floods to be found among other peoples; however,
rather than discounting the reality of the Flood I view this as corroborative.
My ultimate point was
rather to note that morality should not be the backing point for an
argument that supports, or is
against, abortion.
Rather than being an ordered
argument against visionary thinking in the church, it is a kind of crazy quilt of my posts and cartoons related to the topic.
«So long as an opinion is strongly rooted in the feelings,» John Stuart Mill observed, «it gains
rather than loses in stability by having a preponderating weight of
argument against it.
In the case of Hardin's
argument, if the calculations revealed that giving aid to certain countries would result in more
rather than less disease and death, it would follow then that to do so would be an offense
against love and mercy.
If it had been in the original «Antiquities of the Jews»,
rather than being a later interpolation, Origen would have used it in his
arguments against the 2nd - century Greek philosopher Celsus.
rather than have a rational
argument against the idea I expressed, some people can only correct spelling mistakes — thats because they have no rational
argument.
Now, removed from Kaepernick, who is on the outside looking in, with his stance distorted by
arguments cowardly trying to look away from the original issue — claiming he kneeled
against things that he didn't — and with the spotlight pointed at Trump
rather than police brutality, the NFL has decided to protest without really protesting anything.
-- Vote
against the finance bill after listening to the people's concerns over issues like the 10p tax rate (assuming the bill remains talking about retrospective taxation)-- Recognise the much bulkier and more vast
argument against 42 days legislation and support the rebellion
against this legislation
rather than supporting the PR men and the policy writers to the hilt regardless of the realities of the situation.
(I could also ask what
arguments can be made
against, but I consider that a
rather obvious question and can easily come up with several reasons myself)
There is a strong progressive
argument to be made
against membership of the EU by people like me who see it as contributing to the problem of political alienation,
rather than part of the cure for it.
The biggest
argument against such a move is that voters are looking for the minority party to stand
against what they believe to be President Obama's wrong - headed agenda
rather than offer an entire alternative set of policies and, by unifying behind a «Contract», Republicans will be handing Democrats something to shoot at this fall.
According to some climate scientists, the cold in places like Florida actually could be a sign of warming,
rather than an
argument against the phenomenon.
These examples illustrate classic uses of ad hominem attacks, in which an
argument is rejected, or advanced, based on a personal characteristic of an individual
rather than on reasons for or
against the claim itself.
To posit the
argument against fracking, a highly likable Dustin Noble (John Krasinski) acts as a roving environmentalist plastering signs about the town condemning the fracking, even accepting a bribe from Global's agents and,
rather than keeping quiet, using the money to buy more signs opposing the offers by Big Gas.
Rather, Lions for Lambs includes characters presenting arguments for and against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as criticism of a press too eager to report what they're told rather than think for themselves, and an exploration of the political and social disinterest of «Generation Why?&r
Rather, Lions for Lambs includes characters presenting
arguments for and
against the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as criticism of a press too eager to report what they're told
rather than think for themselves, and an exploration of the political and social disinterest of «Generation Why?&r
rather than think for themselves, and an exploration of the political and social disinterest of «Generation Why?».
Appiah makes a powerful and surprising
argument against the idea that the cultural artifacts of long - gone civilizations uncovered in archaeological digs should belong to the nation that currently occupies that ground
rather than the world.
«So long as an opinion is strongly rooted in the feelings, it gains
rather than loses in stability by having a preponderating weight of
argument against it.»
Some
arguments could be make
against us: it's an evidence that what's used to be for a long time, a few authors at the top of the industry, the only ones to have the right (not always by merit, but
rather because they were chosen by publishers) to have their books visible, was highly detrimental for the rest of us.
Arguments against the long - term strategy state that investors forsake gains by riding out volatility
rather than locking in gains, essentially timing the market.
You make a good
argument against credit cards, however I would
rather see everyone control their purchases and stay out of debt.
Many, many people have legitimate
arguments against the game, but those people usually also concur that it's still a good game, just one that they didn't like personally and that it perhaps wasn't deserving of the many maximum scores it got,
rather than just trying to validate their dislike by declaring it to be terrible.
Nor, for that matter, does the 11th century portion of the recommended Polar Urals version of Briffa et al 2013 — which supports the
argument against Briffa's decision to use an «inadequate» version of the Polar Urals data,
rather than the comprehensive Shiyatov dataset.
Right, I should have said «How this can be turned around to become an
argument against the relevance of mitigation»
rather than «
against mitigation».
The experts,
rather than the public, could see the flaws in Wegener's
argument which is why there was a scientific consensus
against him.
It might be worth checking them
against the actual book just to make sure they read verbatim, that's just the sort of ammunition for someone like Plimer to engage in his trademark gabbledygook so he can attack a minor error
rather than answer the main thrust of the
argument if he were to notice this post
The
arguments I have seen
against this approach are all based on fear
rather than on cool - headed logic.
Much of the public
argument against the science indicating that our greenhouse gas emissions are driving global warming has been carried by lobbyists and paid spokesmen who attempt to reposition global warming as theory
rather than fact.
People
against the Tiny Home movement are essentially saying that
rather than glorify the idea of giving up comforts to survive, the U.S. Government should fix the economy so that people don't view the idea of living in a home about the size of a standard RV as reasonable.Besides which, the
argument continues, the people who could most benefit from having a Tiny Home are those who can't afford it.
After a few minutes, it appeared to me that he opposed the very idea of Alberta on principle and wasn't at all interested in hearing my
argument (based on Ezra Levant's book Ethical Oil) that I'd
rather buy my oil from Alberta than from undemocratic regimes like Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Iran, or Nigeria; regimes that either brutalize women, exploit the local population, decapitate those convicted of «crimes,» stone adulterers, discriminate
against minorities, have no environmental standards whatsoever, or try to govern their citizens as if it's the 8th century and not the 21st.
Contempt often gets expressed in the midst of an intense
argument in a last ditch effort to win, but it can also become a
rather chronic attitude that defends
against deeply held resentment of not feeling valued or good enough in the eyes of one's partner.
Personal Attack (Ad Hominem which is Latin for «
against the man» indicating that the attack is directed
against the speaker
rather than his or her
argument): This fallacy occurs when we reject someone's claim or
argument by attacking that person
rather than the person's claim or
argument.