To that end, the law allows a mother to request temporary and permanent court orders of protection to protect both the mother and children from abuse, and a judge is required to consider domestic violence as a factor
against awarding custody to an abusive husband.
Not exact matches
If the court finds a history of domestic abuse exists, a rebuttable presumption
against awarding joint
custody exists.
In determining who should be
awarded custody, the court may want to consider which party has paid attention to the animal's basic daily needs (food, shelter, physical care, exercise, grooming, flea control); who takes the animal to the veterinarian; who provides for social interactions (in the case of dogs) with other dogs and / or with people; who maintains appropriate supervision to assure that state and local regulations are complied with (licensing, not allowing the dog to run free and protecting
against circumstances that would endanger her life or health); and who has the greatest ability to financially support the animal.
Bindmans scooped two
awards — Charlotte Haworth Hird won the Inquests / Actions
Against State
award for her work on a judicial review which led to an inquiry into deaths of 18 - 24 year olds in
custody; Mike Schwarz won Criminal Defence Lawyer for his work exposing misconduct by undercover police officers.
Alaska law also creates a «rebuttable presumption» (a legal assumption that has to be overcome with credible evidence to the contrary) that if an abusive parent has a history of committing domestic violence
against the other parent, a child, or even a domestic living partner, the abusive parent must not be
awarded sole legal
custody, sole physical
custody, joint legal
custody, or joint physical
custody.
While Husband had explanations for this behavior, the Court of Appeals found this behavior mandated
against an
award of joint
custody:
In Kentucky, an appellate court affirmed a lower court's decision to
award primary
custody to the father, based in part on Facebook photos showing the mother partying and drinking
against the advice of her mental health providers.
In cases where the parent seeking sole
custody provides evidence of abuse or that a pattern of abuse exists, the court will presume that it is
against the child's best interests to
award the abusive parent physical or legal
custody.
Custody may be awarded to either parent through fair proceedings and without presumption either in favor of or against physical or joint c
Custody may be
awarded to either parent through fair proceedings and without presumption either in favor of or
against physical or joint
custodycustody.
Regardless of each state's position for or
against a presumption or preference in favor of joint
custody and whether or not it has been specifically authorized, overall there appears to be a growing trend in favor of joint
custody and more and more bills are being introduced to adopt a presumption that joint
custody is in the best interest of the child unless certain circumstances apply (such as convincing evidence that a parent is unfit or that it would not be in the best interest of the child to
award joint
custody).
In some states, the presumption is
against the
award of sole or joint
custody to perpetrators of domestic violence.
Professor Czapanskiy reports that in the Maryland gender bias task force survey judges and lawyers were asked whether «child
custody awards disregard fathers» violence
against mothers.»
For that reason, certain criminal convictions weigh
against allowing a parent to be alone with his child, and may support an
award of sole
custody to you.
Shared parenting assumes that both parents will be
awarded joint
custody, unless other factors (proven abuse or domestic violence) weigh
against it.
«The record before this Court reflects, not a gender bias
against Mother or the fact that she is a career - oriented woman but, rather, a case in which, as between two parents who are fit to be the custodial parent, the best interests of the child will be served by
awarding custody of the child to Father.