If the court finds a history of domestic abuse exists, a rebuttable presumption
against awarding joint custody exists.
Not exact matches
Alaska law also creates a «rebuttable presumption» (a legal assumption that has to be overcome with credible evidence to the contrary) that if an abusive parent has a history of committing domestic violence
against the other parent, a child, or even a domestic living partner, the abusive parent must not be
awarded sole legal
custody, sole physical
custody,
joint legal
custody, or
joint physical
custody.
While Husband had explanations for this behavior, the Court of Appeals found this behavior mandated
against an
award of
joint custody:
Custody may be awarded to either parent through fair proceedings and without presumption either in favor of or against physical or joint c
Custody may be
awarded to either parent through fair proceedings and without presumption either in favor of or
against physical or
joint custodycustody.
Regardless of each state's position for or
against a presumption or preference in favor of
joint custody and whether or not it has been specifically authorized, overall there appears to be a growing trend in favor of
joint custody and more and more bills are being introduced to adopt a presumption that
joint custody is in the best interest of the child unless certain circumstances apply (such as convincing evidence that a parent is unfit or that it would not be in the best interest of the child to
award joint custody).
In some states, the presumption is
against the
award of sole or
joint custody to perpetrators of domestic violence.
Shared parenting assumes that both parents will be
awarded joint custody, unless other factors (proven abuse or domestic violence) weigh
against it.