So it is not a simple lack but an active decision
against belief which is why it is considered a religion.
Not exact matches
«The SEC alleges that one of the world's largest hedge funds, Paulson & Co., paid Goldman Sachs to structure a transaction in
which Paulson & Co. could take short positions
against mortgage securities chosen by Paulson & Co. based on a
belief that the securities would experience credit events.»
The utilitarian
belief that «human goods can be measured
against each other by means of some quantitative scale is the
belief that human goods can be assessed in a way analogous to that by
which commodities have a monetary value.
Chick - fil - a espouses to Christian
beliefs which doesn't discriminate
against Gays, but sees the Gay activity as sinful per multiple Biblical references.
State sanctioned rights must not be influenced by religious
beliefs and a company
which uses consumer money to donate to causes that continue to oppress and discriminate
against those we «love» should be exposed.
For the religous faithful, how, regardless of
which religion you subscribe to, lambast those who go
against your
beliefs?
They kept arguing
against non-Calvinistic
beliefs which I, as a non-Calvinist, did not believe!
This context inspired a new protest, one that we call «pietism,»
which emphasized personal experience and response over
against mere
belief.
Most significantly, Duddington argues
against the charge that permitting an increasing role for religion in the legal and political (i.e., public) spheres would necessitate the imposition of one system of
belief upon another, by re-emphasising the argument that Christianity does not serve to generate a moral code, but rather provides a vehicle through
which it may be discovered.
I suspect their opinion comes from a rebel stance
against any type of authority,
which would indicate some sort of
belief.
If this is true, and it seems to be in my case, than is it not a valid fear and something
which leaders may want to work
against, given that they have motivation to defend the church and / or some of said
beliefs?
Come on now and stop all the bigotry,
which is fueled by pure ignorance and (Fox News LOL) and start educating yourself more before you spout off ridiculous rants
against Muslims or other religions foreign to your
beliefs.
Induction has been accused of many shortcomings, but the common denominator of the various criticisms leveled
against it, from Popper to Kuhn to Feyerabend, is that
belief in induction is responsible for a naive empiricism
which views science as based on uninterpreted observation and direct verification of theories by the «facts.»
Because it was a democratic administration
which finally broke the backs of segregation in the 1960's, those who fought so bitterly
against integration moved to the republican party to the regret of many republicans who are finding no home for the expression of their true political
beliefs.
The religious community's tradition and
belief - system offer ethical guidelines within
which (or even
against which) individuals can develop their own functional value hierarchies.
They assume not only a settled ecclesiastical system in the Church, but also an established body of orthodox
beliefs against which to judge heresy and, what is most significant, a collection of Christian Scriptures.
More should speak out
against ignorance and those who would suppress select knowledge because it does not fit with a
belief system to
which one might subscribe.
Whatever criticism I might level
against «fundamental»
beliefs could easily be turned back on me (
which is why I try not to do that).
We would all like to see him buried under the new WTC but following the Islamic religous
beliefs is important to prevent backlash
against the USA
which we are already subject.
Whether you want to admit it or not, Naturalism (that is, a
belief that nature is the highest authority, or the divine per se) has become just as much of a dogmatic religion as the religions
which Naturalists rail
against.
If you stand for pure scientific
beliefs, shouldn't you be fighting
against anything
which is turning the environment into a gas chamber?
Feel sorry for those and my heart feels for them and wish them guidance to God and true peaceful
belief brings love and mercy to humanity
which is losing it meaning every day with what's happening all through the world because of disrespect, loss of morals, discrimination, unexplained hatred
against nations and religions?!
They said they would be required «to provide insurance coverage for certain drugs and devices that the applicants believe can cause abortions,»
which would be
against their religious
beliefs, Sotomayor wrote in her opinion.
even your post is an opinion, it could be viewed and inciting hatred towards someone's religious
belief,
which goes
against the first amendment and basic right of any amercan.
For if this
belief is a preconceived, rigid assumption, on the basis of
which,
against all experience, it is asserted that God is the final cause of all that happens, then it would clearly be true that the conception of God was not fully developed by Jesus.
Today, we see what Moses was writing,
which was a polemic
against the religious
beliefs and practices of his day.
Which makes me think it was my
belief in the gospel of grace and the assurance of salvation that was the more offensive part to him and he just used the scripture as a sword
against me (good point tl) Very hurtful indeed.
In the ancient world, it was not atheism
against which Christianity had to defend itself but polytheism, the
belief in too many gods.
«Tempting God is disbelief in God, not
belief in Him,» he said, citing an incident in the Old Testament in
which Moses slapped his staff
against a rock to provide water in the desert rather than speak to the rock as God had commanded.
Similarly, as we know that homosexuality is just as natural and God - given as heterosexuality, we realize that the Biblical injunctions
against homosexuality were conditioned by the attitudes and
beliefs about this form of sexual expression
which were held by people without benefit of centuries of scientific knowledge and understanding.
Weather you believe or not (I open my eyes every day) so it's not hard to All will stand before the lord on the day of reckoning
which man will no doubtedly usher in and those who don't believe or
against god will try to wage war on the almighty to no avail, only to be left in ruins... the great Satan (adversary) will be all who oppose god in battle, that serpent of old is still here today, we live in the middle of a brood of vipers and this website is part of the venom aimed at distorting the faithfuls
belief as well as a an agonist for those who wish to continue to disbelieve... CNN is anti god To my brothers and sisters who truly live in Christ Peace be with you and never forget your path despite the darkness that is trying to consume you, bring enough oil for your lamps to live in this darkness and bring extra in case of a delay, he will not abandon you... we will not be forgotten Amen To those who don't, I know the myth of Santa and the easterbunny really choked up your insides to find that they were not real, but childhood is over and it was a cruel human joke designed to make it that much harder for you to believe in that
which visits you and you can't see, no matter you have life so is it too much to ask for a little
belief?
it seems that shame is something you try to use as a weapon
against those who have different
belief systems than you do,
which is one reason why a lot of people have left organized religion.
If I ever write a critical comment,
which refers to these
beliefs, I never want to express hate
against the ordinary believers, but solely
against the wrong doctrine.
Yet it should not be so difficult to understand, nor to perceive the light that this throws upon the nature of
belief, provided one has escaped being altogether confused by the Hegelian doctrine of a universal doubt,
against which it is certainly not necessary to preach.
When I mention alleged cases of abuse to witches, they're quick to warn me
against lumping Wicca in with extreme and literal versions of satanism or devil worship,
which are very different
belief systems.
Fine then stop giving them tax dollars again all this will do is force them to close because they will not go
against their
beliefs,
which means less health care available
which we are going to need desperately.
BRC, I do understand fully, what I think you don't understand by having that clause in their employees insurance policy, they feel that they are aiding a person to get contraceptives or an abortion
which to them is the same thing as going
against their
beliefs.
No, but they are forcing Catholic sponsored organizations to purchase contraception products
which are explicitly
against their moral
beliefs.
It may fairly be said that leaving accommodation [of religion] to the political process will place at a relative disadvantage those religious practices that are not widely engaged in; but that unavoidable consequence of democratic government must be preferred to a system in
which each conscience is a law unto itself or in
which judges weigh the social importance of all laws
against the centrality of all religious
beliefs.
The artist claims he's
against people imposing their
beliefs on others, but his real goal is obviously to try to humiliate Christianity and make people not believe in it,
which is ironic because of his stance on supposedly not imposing
beliefs.
These contemporary trends are reflected in the New Testament, partly in vigorous reaction
against such
beliefs, not by denying the reality to
which they referred, but by claiming that in the gospel men were delivered from helpless subjection to that reality.
Basically, people whom don't believe in anything enforcing their
belief over those who do is the same of
which you are portraying as «the better option» Your views, of
which I do respect, won't help anymore than what you're fighting
against.
So Martin - Achard concludes: «the people of Yahweh found the concept of resurrection in Canaan; but for a long time this formed part of a realm over
against which Yahweh stood in His sovereign will, so that, with regard to resurrection, the religion of the Canaanites played a negative part, by obliging the Israelites to make their stand
against it; it had, nevertheless, a sort of indirect action, in making possible a sort of purification of this
belief,
which, in another age and within another context, received a new content.
Second are those in
which religion in general, or a specific faith in particular, is favored
against other
beliefs, as in the older requirement at the state level that officeholders believe in God, or in the nineteenth - century practice of supporting some churches with taxes.
But orginally and fundamentally, religious
beliefs are systematic human acts of struggle
against the power elites
which dominate the people.
«attack those who have religious
beliefs and then try to force them to accept something
which is
against their core values.»
These same
beliefs and symbols articulated by the New England Puritans merged with parallel, similar, and, at time, even dissimilar values and
beliefs from other sources to produce a new ideology
which formed and shaped the resistance of the American colonies
against Crown and Parliament.
That's the difference between athiest,
which I really wouldn't say I am, is that they actually study a
belief before they decide for or
against it.
«We believe there is nothing in Dr. Hawkins» public statements that goes
against the
belief in the power and nature of God, Christ, or the Holy Spirit that the Statement of Faith deems as a necessary requirement for affiliation with Wheaton College,» states the letter,
which also praised Hawkins, the only African American woman with tenure on the Wheaton faculty.
Decisions had to be made from time to time as to where or when services of the church would be held; the church needed to be told of the impending visit of an apostle, or of some prophet or teacher from abroad; a question has been raised as to the good faith of one of these visitors, and there must be some discussion of the point and a decision on it; a fellow Christian from another church is on a journey and needs hospitality; a member of the local congregation planning to visit a church abroad needs a letter of introduction to that church,
which someone must be authorized to provide; a serious dispute about property rights or some other legal matter has arisen between two of the brothers and the church must name someone to help them settle the issue or must in some other way deal with it; a new local magistrate has begun to prosecute Christians for violating the law
against unlicensed assembly, and consideration must be given to ways and means of meeting this crisis; charges have been brought
against one of the members by another member, and these must be investigated and perhaps some disciplinary action taken; one of the members has died, and the church is called on for some special action in behalf of his family in the emergency; differences of opinion exist in the church on certain questions of morals or
belief (such as marriage and divorce, or the resurrection), differences
which local prophets and teachers are apparently unable to compose, and a letter must be written to the apostle — who will write this letter and what exactly will it say?